Consciousness-causation-physics-ontology hypothesis

logical tautology “Nothing is nothing”; deducing synonymical tautology “Nothing is nonexistence” (nonexistence is a synonym for nothing);

synonymical tautology “Nothing is nonexistence”; deducing semantic tautology “Nowhere and a no time has nothing existed” (saying “nothing existing” is like saying “nonexistence existing” which is absurd);

semantic tautology “Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed”; deducing ontology “Something has always existed everywhere”;

logical tautology “Nothing implies nothing”; AND identity morphism “Nothing has the property of nothing”; deducing logical morphism “Nothing is made of nothing”;

logical morphism “Nothing is made of nothing”; deducing physics “Everything is made of something”;

ontology “Something has always existed everywhere”; AND physics “Everything is made of something”; abducting the most synthetic physics-ontology hypothesis “Everything is made of something that has always existed everywhere”;

logical tautology “Nothing implies nothing”; AND semantic tautology “Nothing exists as nothing”; deducing postulate of causation “Nothing is the cause of (and is causal with) nothing”;

postulate of causation “Nothing is the cause of (and is causal with) nothing”; have causation corollaries “Everything is causal”; AND “Something is self-causal”;

causation corollaries “Everything is causal”; AND “Something is self-causal”; abducting the most synthetic causation hypothesis “Everything is causal with something that is self-causal”;

the most synthetic physics-ontology hypothesis “Everything is made of something that has always existed everywhere”; AND the most synthetic causation hypothesis “Everything is causal with something that is self-causal”; abducting the most synthetic causation-physics-ontology hypothesis “Everything is made of and causal with the self-causal that has always existed everywhere”;

“Self-causal” means “self-deterministic”; theorizing I predict that self-determinism is consciousness! predicting consciousness-causation-physics-ontology hypothesis “Everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere”;

1 Like

Alright. How about this then.
Use the concept of void instead of nothing.
How do you build a framework around something that is “the lack of”?

I propose to you that in the face of the literal meaning of “nothing” where all is “void”, logic breaks down, because it cannot be applied to the absence of everything, including concepts, definitions, names and all things.

That which is not, cannot be pointed at, named, called, or thought about, and SPECIFICALLY because of that in a paradox and ironical way, you will be right: Everything is causal, and everything exists, because if it did not, it would be not, and would automatically fall outside of causality.

But to add another twist:
Other causalities COULD exist outside of this bubble of causality.
Just because they do not and/or cannot interact with this causality, their existence is not impossible.
So as a hypothesis: this causality is not everything. Its just a local framework of everything.
A bubble that contains all that is part of the bubble. Not more and not less.

No man is less than nothing.