The point is not to be entertained and challenge-free forever. Your brain would explode if you didn’t have a problem to solve. The problem is you’re solving the wrong problems that aren’t really even problems.
It’s a construction project. All the pieces are already there in the eternal form dimension. We just have combine them differently than they are currently combined.
I also want to add…
If you think you want to reflect reality as it currently is as your perfection; in the new plan, you’ll have to make a sacrifice… it’s actually compassionate and required to avoid accidentally sending people to hell forever…
Everyone needs to know that they’re in a hyperdimensional mirror reality attached to their individual desire manifestation system.
I have my sketches from ‘05/‘06 that might be similar to yours. I dug ‘em out yesterday. I had forgotten details about them. You said your shift or whatever happened in 2007 (the date ILP had the most visitors). Did you have anyone in your life that was discussing ideas with you like the ones in your sketches and videos prior to 2007? Boot ‘em. They broke both our brains, but like Joseph’s brothers. Don’t play their game unless you like boomerangs & huge ass boulders.
I have a sketch from ‘05 or ‘06 that has your exact wording on it. There’s no way I’m sharing it unless I see your sketch first. And there has to be some proof that you didn’t just draw something in order to get me to share my sketch. So good luck with that.
I decided to stop following your lead in spamming other people’s threads ( forgive me Ben and Dan ) and simply address your points here in this thread. Because this is your thread, after all.
That’s not what rape is, Ecmandu. You’re merely playing the feminist game. You’re abusing words with the aim to shame people who, unlike you, have sex.
The first condition for something to be a rape is that it is a non-consensual sex. A non-consensual sex is a form of sex where one of the parties is physically or psychologically manipulated into sleeping with the other person. If this condition isn’t met, then it’s not rape. If a girl wants to have sex with you, and you want to have sex with her, and noone is manipulating anyone, and the two of you then have sex, then that’s not rape. End of story. There is nothing more to it. Whether or not anyone will regret it later on is irrelevant. Whether it’s good or bad for one or both of you, or for the society as a whole, is irrelevant.
If you want to talk about something other than rape, that’s fine, but don’t call it rape; don’t be deceptive. If you want to say that, for each person, the consequences of having sex are worse than the consequences of not having sex, that is fine; just say so. But don’t call it rape. And if you want others to be convinced, make sure you present a clear argument in favor of that claim; make sure that you explain exactly why having sex leads to worse consequences than not having sex.
Your “subtle rape” isn’t rape. If Mary consented to having sex with John, it’s not rape, even if she ends up regretting it later in her life. If Bill Cosby offers Mary to make her popular under the condition that she sleeps with him, and she sleeps with him, that’s not rape, even if he fails to keep his promise, and by doing so, makes her regret doing business with him. You can say that Bill Cosby is a liar, you can criticize him for offering that deal in the first place, but you can’t say he’s a rapist ( at least not in this particular case. )