They must have banned him a long long time ago, because these days I’d hazard a guess that there’s almost nothing anyone could say that would get them banned.
You should register a new account, Ec. Call yourself something like “Approach Escalation” or “No Means Yes” and everyone from ILP will know who you are. Or, actually, you can just go with “Ecmandu Marr”.
I’m tired of the bait and switch. Because I’m the singularity for this concept, people call me god and wish to punish me forever.
Or they use the, “all that you are is given by god and can be taken away at anytime if you don’t obey and try to think… you arrogant piece of shit Jason.”
Nobody has billions of friends. If they do, the friendship is likely very surface-level, or the definition of friendship is way off. And the 40+ year relationship should be the deepest one, or what’s the freaking point. It’s a matter of where you most invest your limited time and energy. The folks you keep in your life the longest should be those you treasure/appreciate most & who most treasure/appreciate you. If you have a stayer, stay back harder, and they’ll do the same, and you’ll just keep multiplying off each other until you never want to leave or unstay. If someone leaves, it’s usually because the other stopped staying harder… or just stopped staying, period.
Because there was perhaps unresolved consent violation. Because one/both were not down with peer review.
The scientific method is very, very important.
You don’t have to lose all your friends, you just have to redefine friendship. If your “herd” includes a bunch of free-sex cows, your main cow ain’t gonna give milk. Perv. lol jk
I am totally FUBAR because I’m the singularity for the approach escalation causes all war problem. No means yes problem. (Male to female) homosexuals not stating it to have clean sex.
Totally fubar for the singularly of the, “consent violation is the only problem in existence problem”
Totally fubar that the goal of life is that everyone gets everything they desire at no expense to anyone singularity.
If a female or homosexual had figured this out …
I would not be totally fucked up beyond recognition.
Because I was a male, it fucks my whole life up.
I have lots to be grateful for….
My necessary eternal condemnation is not one of them.
I’ve told you this before…. Someday you’ll be where I am in your own way, and you’ll realize that everyone EVENTUALLY goes to hell forever if this problem isn’t solved.
You’re the type of person who doesn’t see exclusion of the best as a problem.
So we really don’t think alike.
Some people might call me dumb.
I’m not dumb to know that it should have NEVER been a heterosexual male who first observed and articulated it.
You claim you can have any woman you want. How can I know that it’s true? How about an example? SUppose that Ichthus lived where you live. How would you approach her? What would you do?
I don’t want to defend Ecmandu but to say that what Lorikeet wrote in that other thread is “only slightly more inflammatory” than what Ecmandu said in the above quote is a serious understatement. Pretty much every single word in that Lorikeet’s opening post is an insult. And he wrote a lot of words.
That said, Ecmandu should definitely behave. Just remember Ec, you are banned on all other forums.