Coronavirus Hoax

Coronavirus is at worst, a bad flu, nothing more.

I don’t trust government or media much, if at all, but for the sake of argument, let’s take a look at their own numbers.

Take Spain, one of the countries hit hardest by coronavirus.
Spain has a population of about 47 million.
According to this:

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/coronavirus-death-toll-in-spain-overtakes-china-as-lockdowns-extend-around-globe/ar-BB11GKo3?li=AAggNb9

the coronavirus death toll in Spain is a mere 3434.
For perspective, according to this:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/450171/number-of-deaths-in-spain/

about 400 000 people, or 1% of the Spain’s population, die anually.
3437 vs 400 000.
Statistically 3437 is nothing by comparison.

The idea coronavirus will definitely spread and kill 5 or 10% of Spaniards if we don’t decimate the Spanish economy and rob them of their civil liberties, is speculation, fear mongering, more on that in a bit.

Bear in mind, government and media, deliberately or indeliberately, exaggerated the threat posed by Bird Flu, Swine Flu, Ebola, SARS, Hantavirus, West Nile Virus and so on.
We don’t let individuals off the hook when they fuck up, and wildly exaggerate shit, and neither should we let institutions and corporations off the hook.
When you consistently fuck up, again and again, we lose trust, as we should.
They have a habit of overestimating the threat viruses pose, not underestimating them, and we need to take that into account when reviewing what they’re forecasting now.

It’s still too early to say, but it seems like that, just a bad flu.

The real fear is if it is-in-fact, a bad flu. Because this would then mean that the Western World has severely damaged society and the economy, based on fear, and fear-alone.

This would represent a severe spiritual and moral flaw, weakness, which maybe the underlying case.

K: you are and I quote: an Idiot…

Kropotkin

If you want to cast aspersions, at the very worst you can say that the response has been to ‘err on the safe side’.

Imagine the reverse position. New virus arises. The world says “meh, it’s just a bad flu, business as usual” pandemic occurs, health systems get overrun, a whole bunch of people die, all institutional infrastructure is compromised by staff shortages - runs on banks, true panic shopping, looting, fires etc. etc.

Then you’d be saying “illuminati bioweapon culls poor.”

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/coronavirus-death-toll-in-spain-overtakes-china-as-lockdowns-extend-around-globe/ar-BB11GKo3?li=AAggNb9

So about 400 000 have been infected, on record, and about 20 000 have died, on record.
That’s a death rate of 5%.
However, experts like Angelo Borelli say the number of infected is probably about 10 times higher, which would put it at 4 million, but do experts say the number of dead is probably about 10 times higher, which would put it at 200 thousand?
No.
Why is that?
Because all the dying went to the hospital where they could be tested, whereas the vast majority of infected who were asymptomatic or had mild-moderate symptoms didn’t visit the hospital where they could be tested.
So the real number of infected is probably 4 million, but the real number of dead is only 20 thousand.
That’s a death rate of 0.5%.

For comparison, the death rate of the ordinary flu (in the US) is about 0.1%.

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html

And the Spanish flu of 1918:

https://virus.stanford.edu/uda/

I heard the death rate of the bubonic plague was 3:1.

Ordinary flu: 0.1%
Coronavirus: 0.5%
Spanish flu: 5%
Black death: 33%

So coronavirus is much closer to being an ordinary flu than it is to being the Spanish flu of 1918, and you can’t even compare it to the bubonic plague.
The Spanish flu was 10 times deadlier than the coronavirus probably is, but we still call the Spanish flu, a flu.
Again, the coronavirus is, in all likelihood, a bad flu, nothing more.
It’s nowhere near to being the worst sorts of flu.

Notice how not everyone gets infected with the flu every year (about a 6th of the population gets it), despite us not taking extra precautions to prevent it, just as not everyone will get infected with coronavirus, even if we don’t take extra precautions to prevent it.
So if the death rate is 0.5%, the total number of deaths in the US won’t be 0.5% of the population, but something like 0.05%.
Something like 1% of the population of the US dies every year from every kind of disease and accident, and this number varies quite a bit from year to year, some years it may be 1.5%, others it may be 0.5%, so an additional 0.05% of deaths is by no means an insurmountable amount of additional sickness and death.

The gentlemen raise good points and I concur. Gloom and Tab are both right.

I’m gonna say the coronavirus is a rehearsal, like a beta test, to see what would happen in a real pandemic scenario. Then, several years later after the world has recovered, they’ll drop the big one on us that they’re now working on. The wealthy one percent will then move into space stations orbiting the Earth and turn the Earth into a materials depot to supply for construction and terraforming on the moon and Mars.

Who’re you quoting? :confused:
Quit while you’re ahead, Joe Biden.

The virus is real but whether it is being exaggerated for huge global power grabs is another thing entirely.

I would say there is a distinct possibility it is an intentional bioweapon unleashed on the planet for that same very purpose. One thing alone is certain,the consequences of this global viral pandemic are very real.

On top of all that, viruses aren’t monolithic or uniform, just as species aren’t.
Just as some individuals and population groups within humanity have stronger immune systems than others, some individuals and population groups within viruses are deadlier than others, and coronavirus is no exception.
Weaker variants of the coronavirus will spread faster than stronger variants, because they’re more likely to go undetected, and contracting weaker variants, in whole or in part, immunizes you against stronger ones, so our collective susceptibility to coronavirus will in all likelihood only diminish with time, and the death rate decline.
I have no idea by how much, perhaps the death rate will be halved, from around 0.5 to around 0.25, but I can say that in all probably it’ll only decrease in time after more and more people get exposed to faster spreading, but weaker variants.

I read somewhere that 80% of 90+ year olds (the median death is 80) recover from coronavirus, and that’s just the ones on record, so it could be more like 96% of 90+ year olds, but even if it is just 80%, even 90+ year olds have a good chance of contracting weaker variants and getting immunized against stronger ones, let alone young people.

It’s sad that thanks to our irresponsible, fear mongering media, there’s millions of young people out there, kids, teenagers and young adults, thinking there’s a good chance they’ll contract coronavirus and die.
How much will all this stress shorten their life expectancy, everyone’s life expectancy?
Not only stress from fear of the virus itself, but the stress of losing your job, your career, your small business, your very way of life?

If government and the media were being honest with us, the benefits (assuming there are any) of medical martial law (because that’s what it is) would be openly weighed against the costs, discussed with the public, but they’re not, because at the very least, even if there is no sinister agenda to further enslave and exterminate the people, government and the media, doesn’t trust us enough to have an adult conversation with us, in a supposed democracy.
No our betters have decided what to do with our lives, liberty and economy for us, and our sole role is to unthinkingly obey and rat on our friends and neighbors who won’t.
To cancel, censor and deplatform all dissent.
To dox, fine and imprison all dissidents.
This is not democracy in action.
This is yet another example of 21st century post-modern authoritarianism on display, one of countless.

Young people have next to no chance of dying from this flu, and even middle aged and most old people have little chance of dying from it (like 1 in thousands, hundreds and dozens respectively), unless they’re already severely, chronically ill (particularly if it’s a respiratory illness or an illnesss that leaves you vulnerable to respiratory illnesses).
But if you just read the headlines, you’d never know that, only people who read often, read carefully, read between the lines, who can connect dots, fill in the blanks, look at the big picture, make inferences, put things into perspective, who’ve been around the block more than once or twice, know that this is being massively overhyped.
Government and the media ought to be ashamed of themselves.
Absolutely appalling behavior on their behalf.
Fake news.

Gloomy baby, it’s not a naturally occurring virus, it’s an escaped engineered bioweapon that has gotten loose, why else do you think world governments everywhere are freaking the fuck out?

They know it’s not a naturally occurring virus which is why they’re trying to calm the sheople by publicly calling it novel.

But of course the government doesn’t want a sober, rational, thinking, questioning public, it wants millions of headless farm animals running around the barn hysterically.

Well, when you got a severe bioweapon with a long incubation period where for several weeks people show no symptoms until much later that’s of course what you’re going to get.

This thing was designed in a lab somewhere with the sole purpose of infecting and killing as much people as possible. It’s a bioweapon of war my dude.

Yup, this is something we can be much more sure of in hindsight than in forecast, but it looks that way to me too, like it’s being wildly exaggerated, based on the data points I gave and how I interpreted them.
If I’m right, then either government/media is very incompetent, very tyrannical, or some combination of the two, and yes that level of incompetency and/or corruption is more frightening than even the most calamitous projections of corona.
Based on what I know about government/media, my moneys on corruption.
When their, mistakes, always benefit them at our expense, they’re not mistakes at all.
It’s always less liberty, wealth and power for us, and more for them.

We’ll see. The flu deaths each year are under 100,000 in the US alone.

The prediction from corona = 2 million in the US.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUWZA43UblM[/youtube]

My dispute though, is that this is bad for “the elites” and “top 1%”. The hit to the economy hit the rich hardest, by devaluing assets and the dollar, especially with the $2 trillion bailout.

So the damage is very expensive. As you mention, I point to the Mass Media Mob and fake-news media as prime culprits. They have benefited, if none else.

Why isn’t the MSM talking about boosting people’s immune systems with nutrition, whole foods and supplements?
Even if hygiene, social distancing and vaccines when they become available are 10 times more affective (which, I don’t believe they are, I believe it’s the other way around, but for the sake of argument), you think at least 10, or 1, at the very least 1% of articles would be about how to boost your immune system, but I can’t recall reading a single one.
There may be a few out there, but I haven’t seen any, instead all I can recall is reading some articles debunking myths nutrients like vitamin C cure coronavirus.

Sure, vitamin C alone probably can’t cure coronavirus, perhaps it can’t cure any viruses at all (altho it can cure certain conditions like scurvy…which’s neither here nor there)l, but it can at least boost your so called immune system, or rather, make your cells stronger and healthier so they can’t be penetrated and preyed upon by viruses (and having weak cells from lack of nutrition and an abundance of toxicity is itself, with or without viruses, the primary cause of disease, from my experience and research), but no, not a single, solitary article, and finding a handful of exceptions doesn’t disprove the rule.

Nothing, or next to nothing about nutrition, why is that?
Could big pharma, government and the media have a financial agenda?
Of course they bloody well do, and they have an authoritarian agenda, and I believe a population reduction agenda as well.
They want us sick and either dependent on their frankenfoods and the medications we need to cope with our adverse reactions to their frankenfoods rather than independent, healthy and eating whole foods, or dead.
Sick, helpless and dependent, or dead, that’s their MO.

You can’t patent a nutrient, but you sure as hell can patent a high-tech antibiotic, drug or vaccine.
That’s where the real monopoly money is, in what you can patent.
That’s the only reason why drugs like cocaine are illegal, because cocaine has loads of medicinal properties, as they refer to them, and loads of pharmaceutical drugs have loads of recreational properties and can just as, if not more easily make you dependent i.e. addicted, sick and kill you.

But then they make tons of money off the illegal drug trade too.
If a substance is illegal, government can easily monopolize it that way, by working together with some mobsters, and imprisoning their competitors.
What they sure as hell don’t want is for you to be able to grow plants with strong medicinal and recreational properties in your own garden, that doesn’t benefit them.

It’s a pretty damn weak virus if it’s a bioweapon. IOW it’s an utter failure as a bioweapon, and given it’s long incubation period it would benefit no nation.