Basically I believe in the right to life, liberty and property, but of course sometimes the latter 2 can conflict with the former 1, however I don’t see a need to forcibly medicate anyone for anything, ever.
Every cooperation has its limits. And divisions such as class, race, and national identity are, after all, among the very variables that drive the economy: War! So there is a contradiction in your thinking that can not be resolved. It is the same contradiction that Marx did not notice when he started from the premise that all history was “the history of class struggles” and concluded falsely that all men would go to heaven after winning their “last battle”. “Peoples hear the signals! To the final battle!” (“So comrades, come rally! And the last fight let us face!”) This “last fight” is always only the last fight before the next fight; because fights, battles, i.e. wars drive the economy, fights; battles, i.e. wars bring money. They will not end as long as there are humans who win money with them. And “thanks” to the communists, those humans can suggest to mankind that every battle is only “the last battle”.
I know that Marx’ version of the future is attractive for many people (and ILP members - not to forget). But that does not automatically mean that Marx was right about his version of the future.
Just remove your skin and role around in the dirt so that you can unite and become one with the world.
I think there might be a good reason that all life is not a singularity.
Independent structures count.
promethean75: … territory disputes unnecessarily choke economic potential and therefore keep each isolated group in a slowly evolving state. If they all cooperated together, economy would be much more efficient… but to cooperate, you can’t have divisions like class, race and national identity. Countries are dissolving their boarders and working peeps all over the erf are recognizing the insignificance of these divisions when they become more aware of the struggles they have in common
GA:
Every cooperation has its limits. And divisions such as class, race, and national identity are, after all, among the very variables that drive the economy: War! So there is a contradiction in your thinking that can not be resolved. It is the same contradiction that Marx did not notice when he started from the premise that all history was “the history of class struggles” and concluded falsely that all men would go to heaven after winning their “last battle”. “Peoples hear the signals! To the final battle!” (“So comrades, come rally! And the last fight let us face!”) This “last fight” is always only the last fight before the next fight; because fights, battles, i.e. wars drive the economy, fights; battles, i.e. wars bring money. They will not end as long as there are humans who win money with them. And “thanks” to the communists, those humans can suggest to mankind that every battle is only “the last battle”.
I know that Marx’ version of the future is attractive for many people (and ILP members - not to forget). But that does not automatically mean that Marx was right about his version of the future.
[/quote]
K: I have criticize Marx before… I don’t believe his final ending of history where we all
ride into the sunset and live happily ever after… even after the end of class, there
shall be blood… it will a never ending, ongoing strife ridden universe…
(was I dramatic enough or do I need to aid more drama words?)
anyway… Marx was wrong in his final prediction… life will go on, ever after
the end of the classes… there will always other battles to fight…
Kropotkin
“I have criticize Marx before… I don’t believe his final ending of history where we all
ride into the sunset and live happily ever after”
C’mon keter u know karl said no such thing nor did he make such promises. That perfect utopian world nonsense is a straw man contrived by the right, and here’s why; if they make Marxism appear as if it’s unrealistic and impossible, nobody will pay any attention to it. And that shit has worked, bro. Ur a case and point. Even the leftists have drank the Kool aid. Or do I say drunk?
What do you think his final state was proposed to be?
Before the fall of the Berlin Wall it seemed that the West would be stronger than communism. It seemed so! In reality, communism infiltrated the West more than the West infiltrated communism, so that one could assume that the West was weaker than communism. During the fall of the Berlin Wall it seemed that the West had defeated communism. It seemed so! What really happened could be seen a relatively short time later. Communism was about to defeat the West.
“The history of all society to date is the history of class struggles.” (Marx-Engels Works, Vol. 4, p. 462.)
“In place of the old bourgeois society with its classes and class antagonisms comes an association in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.” (Marx-Engels Works, Vol. 4, p. 482.)
I think that is a little too simple. The way I see it -
Constitutional democracy was conquering the West but by using a cloak of faux democracy socialism conquered the constitutionalism (except for the US republic). Communism conquered imperial East through brute force. Because the West’s socialism was merely a shame democracy when China got invited into the game real-communism became the next step - playing out now.
But what does that look like?
Why did, for instance, Kissinger go to the Communist China on a secret mission in July 1971? In October 1971, the Communist China took over the Permanent Seat at the UN from the National China (Taiwan). Most likely, Mao promised Kissinger something in return. And there were more deals.
And no it doesn’t change ur DNA u weirdos. It doesn’t get into the nucleus of the cell to make contact with it. It just give instructions to protein making components that float around in the chloroplast or whatever.
If this was bullshit, everybody but the nuts on bitchute wouldn’t be explaining the same thing. There’d be conflicting reports between them.
I am nothing close to an expert on this topic but it looked to me that it was just a meeting to lay out the strategy for the final goal of globalism (which has apparently been going on since the very beginning thousands of years ago - all through developed secret nation-aginst-nation strategies, cabals, and alliances from atop - the manipulating hand of God - “Man”.
Apparently they arranged negotiations concerning when each party would do what so that the U.N. would become the world council and parliament. China was to play a very significant role due to its large population (to entice the crony capitalists) and its successful military form of communist control. They could not produce wealth but once given the inroads they could do the vampire thing that the Jews and Soviets were so well known for. It established what appears to be an alliance between the Chinese and the Jews. And that is what has been playing out from then til now.
I am still confused as to how the CCP and Israel expect to resolve their ultimate differences, but I’m sure they each have a plan.
But back more precisely to the topic - using diseases has been a part of this scenario since long before the world wars. I think they are only recently in a position to simply invent the necessary diseases to kill off the proper planned portion of the peasants (“gain of function research” and DNA altering viruses and vaccines).
I suspect Mr Trump merely triggered them into using COVID before their original plans. And he certainly blocked it from doing anywhere near the intended damage. 3 million dead only scratches the surface of the “third of the population” design. Obviously (for those observing) they are working on improving their effectiveness soon.
You only learn of the conflicts by looking for them and not by arguing about things you only hear from the propaganda point of view - “drinking the kool-aid”.
History shows us enough examples from the communist communities. In communist communities - examples: Soviet Union and its satellites, China, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam and other communist "people’s republics - everybody is “explaining the same thing”.
Everywhere the same thing. The same talk, the same fuss, the same acting, the same “explaining” … and so on. Everything the same.
This is communism: sameness (equality) of everything everywhere. No exception.
A lot of people don’t want to get covaxxed, including a lot of healthcare workers.
UTICA, N.Y. (WUTR-TV) — The COVID vaccine was developed much faster than previous vaccines, and despite research, many people don’t trust it just yet. Last month, Pew Research Center put out a survey and 39% of Americans said they would definitely or probably not, get the vaccine. The CDC shared a survey in November and only 63% of healthcare workers said they’d get the vaccine.
https://www.news10.com/news/coronavirus/some-healthcare-workers-dont-want-the-covid-19-vaccine/
As an aside, I think far too many (than possible) people would be required to collaborate in order for a conspiracy of this scale to work, and continue working.
Everyone from the nurse at the hospital down the street to the CNN news anchors would have to be in on it.
I’d entertain that the virus is a real accident and it provided the opportunity to launch operation Bidendome in the western world (by whoever might launch such things).
Here’s the thing. Almost without exception, every theory that opposes the information made available by a general internet search, is published by someone who is a nutt. Like u don’t ever find moderate conspiracy theory anywhere. But my point is, there’s just too many people agreeing on a single theory that if turning out to be a conspiracy, would require an impossible amount of collaboration in order to work.
R y’all pickin up wut I’m puttin down?
I’ll tell you why it always ends up at aliens and secret cults and all that stuff. The natural intuition of the incredible difficulty involved in executing a conspiracy of such a scale, forces the imagination to account for it’s grand organization somehow… and the concept of the deepstate, the sophisticated secret society or otherworldly power, is formed in the mind as the source and cause of the design. And when that hamster gets ta runnin’ real good on that wheel, u start making connections where there are none and the design of the conspiracy continues getting more and more complex.