Corporate Tyranny and Corporate Control of Society

Philosophy Forums Society, Government, and Economics
1

This is 1500’s serfdom. Corporation controls all. The only law is the Law of the Corporation.

Corporations are above the law. Corporations are the law. Total circus clown shit-show of corporate rule and 1500’s serfdom, we are all peasants and subjects of the Corporation.

https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=-4YgqECQgXM&listen=false

This man’s channel is being given copyright strikes and he is on his 2nd strike, if he is on his third strike his channel will be taken down. This man was following the law of the land but the Corporation is above the law and makes its own laws, and doesn’t respect anyone’s legal rights. He also lost a lot of money on this case and the money stolen from him by Youtube. As far as our country is concerned its a 1500’s peasant feudal system and the Corporations are allowed to oppress the poor.

Our entire legal system is structured in such away as to allow Corporations to rule society and poor people cannot afford lawyers.

Outlining the video he was first copyright Striked by Bloomberg for posting a political video about trump. Bloomberg wants a fascist society where political clips of political figures is not allowed by society and censored. Political commentary is not allowed, only fascist corporate rule is allowed.

Now for a different video he was again copyright Striked for uploading a clip in Fair Use legally allowed legally allowed Fair Use commentary and he was copyright Striked for doing fair and honest news reporting. In order to avoid copyright Strikes he would have had to do dishonest reporting and digitally alter the video digitally edit the video to remove the music from the video.

He lost a lot of money from this video and it was stolen by youtube and given to Epidemic sound, then he had to pay lawyers a lot of money. Then his lawyers send Epidemic sound a letter and Epidemic can’t even respond like a human and gives a retarded bot response instead that doesn’t even comprehend what the letter was asking. By the way I have always thought Epidemic sound had only mediocre music, and a lack of talent, this just proves that meritocracy doesn’t exist in America.

Then we have Google/Oracle trying to buy out CNN and Warner Brothers and some other company. Already they own Youtube, then Nethanyu bought Tiktok as well. This seems very fascist like some very racist very fascist and very illegal kind of corporate dictatorship, where one race is able to control all the media. There are specific laws against monopoly called anti-trust laws, yet for some reason, America has turned into some anarchy shit-show circus where corporations no longer have to follow any laws.

Its like al capone except al capone was cool and based and these people are not cool and not based. And al capone was an american hero giving freedom to the people, while these people only remove freedom and don’t improve america in any way and make it worse.

We need external citizen police because the internal police do not make corporations obey laws, so we need some kind of citizen police that are outside the system to help the average citizen instead of corporate dictators. again its like al capone where the police will do absolutely nothing against the al capone dictatorship but there are no citizen police to make america a great country again.

For instance we would need citizen police to enforce a UBI society where if a Corporation has a robot workforce they must pay a UBI, normal police are probably going to do nothing and allow a corporation to have a robot workforce and do absolutely nothing while there’s no ubi and no jobs.

2

Even AI told me corporations are out of control. The AI told me modern software is structured in a way which causes stress and mental health professionals acknowledge it causes mental illness and recommend a digital detox.

For example when you go to type something in a search bar there is no way to disable random suggestions, they do this to get you addicted and often put irrelevant or shocking suggestions.

Another example is they force you to see videos on the Home page or side of the screen or right after the end of the video, usually suggesting shocking content because they know humans are more likely to click negative things instead of positivity.

It’s all very disgusting and uncivilized and goes against the progress of our society. The progress of our society is to become a more egalitarian and enlightened society, an emancipated society and such. Some Corporations seem to want a feudal system and the dark ages.

Most normies are perfectly content being subjects of Corporations and living in a digital internet of filth but I’m not.

image
image474×266 33.6 KB

image
image474×266 33.6 KB

image
image474×315 51.2 KB

3

The internet’s only meaningful purpose today is as a means of communication between anarchists. That’s the most noble purpose it can serve. Everything else is just the dissemination of benign information (unless it is anarchist material) and meaningless chatter.

Even something as simple as googling what temp to bake boneless chicken at is totally useless because baking chicken at proper temperature does not accelerate social and political mayhem.

4

I am not an anarchist, the whole problem is corporate anarchy. There are laws which are there to prevent this dystopian predicament of rule by corporation, but they aren’t being followed. All it is is corporate anarchists that don’t follow any laws but want to rule over us as a nation.

Even the way we speak supports the Corporation. The Corporation has become a verb in the English language. Nobody just says “searching” they say “googling” now, even a monopoly in the way we speak.

5

Yet again I’m proven right:

https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=Rhcp7ZUiw3g

First 6 minutes. This is not an AI thread. This is not about AI. He talks about technology at the beginning.

Question: Why hasn’t Tristan fixed Youtube yet.

Question: Why do high iq males sound like women.

6

@futureone

The term you’re looking for is corporate neofeudalism. :clown_face:

1 Like
7

Stealing from everyday Australians…

Massive corporations that dont pay tax in Australia!

Take a stroll down the list.

When corporations put profit before people, it’s every day people that pay the price.

1 Like
8

I lost any and all respect for Australia once I found out their nerf gun laws.

“In Australia, laws regarding Nerf guns can vary by state. In South Australia, for example, certain Nerf guns can be classified as firearms if they can fire gel balls, requiring registration, while in New South Wales, they may also fall under firearm regulations, leading to potential legal issues for unauthorized possession.”

Even this anti-gun youtuber comedian hates Australia and says their gun laws are excessive and the politicians there are crooked murderers.

1 Like
9

If it is of any consolation machete attacks, killings, robberies in Australia have replaced “the gun”.

I find it difficult to choose which one I would allow.

To be mutilated by an AK 47 or be beheaded by a machete.

Both are an abomination, both should be outlawed.

But that was not what my post was about.
In a way corporate theft could be responsible for violence in everyday Australian’s livelihoods, but this should not justify the violence that some deem acceptable.

A comedian’s opinion is given for a laugh, about a serious subject which is in very bad taste and just as unacceptable.

1 Like
10

@reason4emotion

It’s very difficult being a career criminal inside the United States because everybody here has a gun. Even grandma in her wheelchair is hiding a snub nose revolver in her purse. :clown_face:

11

No offense but this is kind of autistic. If you watched the video you wouldn’t make the broad generalization about him. A lot of his jokes are in bad taste, but not in the type of way you are talking about.

You do realize machetes have a purpose besides violence right? They are for clearing brush and surviving in the jungle. Ak 47s have a purpose as well, it is a weapon for revolutionaries to uprising against injust dictatorships.

It is because americans have ak47s that politicians do not outlaw nerfs in the first place. It used to be right-wing hyperbole that the gun-grabbers would come for our nerfs, but now it doesn’t seem like hyperbole anymore.

If it was up to politicians, everyone would live in an apartment with cameras in every room, even the bathroom, and everyone would own nothing. And there would be 8 PM curfews.

12

No offence taken.

Admittedly I did not view video and it was remiss of me for not doing so.

Machetes have now been outlawed by the government special permit needed.

1 Like
13

@reason4emotion

This wouldn’t make me feel safe at all when you need a special permit to own a butter knife. :clown_face:

14

Female feminist dictatorship.

Ban machetes, ban ak47s, ban cars, ban everything. Outlaw fun. The goal is to live in a sci-fi bubble with no rights.

I’ll make you a deal, IF you ban cars then I am willing to agree to a ban to ak47s. Often, when I am in a car I almost get into a fatal crash. Or when I ride a bike I almost have a crash with cars. You know what’s actually a danger to me? Cars. You know what’s statistically a danger to everybody? Cars. When’s the last time someone threatened me with an ak47? Never. But I feel threatened by cars almost every time I go outside. You know how many Americans die from cars? Over 40,000 in 2023. The amount died from ak47s? Probably less than 100 people.

Cars totally clog up the road too. They make the whole thing nervous. If there weren’t any cars on the road, people could ride their bicycle double or triple the distance, cause they wouldn’t have to stop at stop signs or ride on bumpy sidewalks. This would solve climate change.

Second thing, banning machetes is pointless, why wouldn’t they just stab with kitchen knives then? Are you going to ban those too?

15

Settle down “kathoey”.

futureone:

When’s the last time someone threatened me with an ak47? Never.

The amount died from ak47s? Probably less than 100 people.

You admit there is no need, just like to clutter the closet.

BUT

I do believe if a person wants to have a gun, then it is their right to own one and not the government’s right to dictate yes or nay.

Taking over gun ownership in this country is the first step in taking control that is what I object to.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yAPGsrf6gc

1 Like