iamphibious,
Sadly, we can’t. As a nihilist, you hold the view that there are no right or wrong answers to these questions. --At least not that we could know of. So, without a criterion of moral truth to decide which claims are false and which claims are true, there’s really no point in us discussing it. Neither up there, nor down here.
No, I note only that given the manner in which I come to understand morality as embedded in the arguments I make in my signature threads, right and wrong answers reflect the embodiment of “I” as dasein out in a particular world, understood in a particular way. At the existential juncture of identity, value judgments and political economy.
Others however insist that there are in fact criteria/fonts for moral and political truths – in God, in pantheism, in ideology, in reason, in deontological intellectual/philosophical contraptions. Et cetera.
All I can then suggest is that they take these “objectivist” moral narratives and political agendas and explore them with me given a set of circumstances – from “the news” say – that most here are likely to be familiar with.
Sure, we may well go around and around and in the same circles as before, but, well, what else is there? At least until one of these objectivists is in fact able to link me to demonstrable evidence that confirms his or her own convictions.
Not too good. I am still convinced that human interactions unfold in an essentially meaningless No God world that will end one day in the obliteration of "I’’ for all the rest of eternity. Unless, of course, you count “star stuff”.
But I have never approached “the pursuit of wisdom” in philosophy as revolving around thoughts and feelings that are aimed basically at comforting and consoling me. Coming up with an understanding of “I” out in the world around me that is the least discomfiting. Instead, I have to go where the arguments in my signature threads actually take me.
Actually, in the interim, yes. I’m not afflicted with any life-threatening health issues. I’ve got tons of things that I enjoy doing. Music, film, books, art, following the news, PBS, the Science Channel. Things that still bring me enormous amounts of fulfilment and satisfaction.
And since I reject objectivism, I’m not tied down to one or another moral and political dogma that ever and always requires me to do only the right thing. A lot more options in other words.
And yourself?
Anyway, if you do bump into others who would like to reconfigure ILP back to the days when the discussions were considerably more, well, challenging, tap them on the shoulder and invite them over.
You can even warn them about me.