[b]How was it that fascism a kind of government utilizing raw brute military force as a method of authoritarian control succumbed to democracy in the west? It’s because under an environment of fascism there is no thin veneer of illusion concerning morality or ethics being maintained in the public psyche. Fascism doesn’t even pretend to be a moral or ethical social order concerning its methods of retaining centralized power. Democracy won in the west because it was able to keep the masses psychologically satiated concerning the thin veneer of morality and ethics aided by idealistic illusion. Democracy tells its citizens that its government cares about human rights, equality, freedom, and the general well being of its population even when in reality the oligarchy controlling democracy doesn’t at all whatsoever. Indeed, all governments have one thing in common in that there is always a ruling oligarchy forever present in one form or another.
Communism much like democracy tried the same thing with its citizens but collapsed under its own weight as the political and authoritarian experiment fell apart entirely.
Now we see modern democratic social welfare states collapsing under from their own weight because they are unable to prop up the thin veneer of illusion or delusion concerning human morality and ethics anymore. What comes after the collapse of democracy in the west is anybody’s best guess.[/b]
K: if you knew history, you would know that communism has never been tried. The soviet union
and China were dictatorships in the pretense of communism. Even anarchism has been tried and
it succeeded by the way, Spain in 1935, 1936 in Barcalona during the Spanish civil war. Franco
went into the city and crushed it 36 or 37. Socialism has been tried and true for a century in Europe
and since the Depression in the U.S. When it began to fail is because of America inability to
adapt to the current situation. We need more socialism not less to adapt to the new world.
[b]It doesn’t matter what kind of government you have whether it be fascist, communist, socialist, or democratic where whatever one you have the pressing need to manufacture consent of the people by the state is always present.
The state cannot exist unless at first it convinces the masses that its existence was consented by them in the first place.
The state of whatever government requires manufactured consent, legitimacy, and credibility at all times where this is why propaganda is forever present from all its institutions.[/b]
[b]Why should people be protected from each other?
The government supposedly protecting us from ourselves is an excuse to keep the noose of tyranny and control around our necks. It’s like a plantation owner telling their slave that they couldn’t do any better off the plantation where they should thank their very lucky stars for being under the whip.[/b]
[b]A cross of iron? No, it’s what humanity does best. Kill, steal, rape, and enslave. It seems to be the redeeming talent and gift humanity possesses.
No one makes a stand against it because of many invested interests or too many police and law enforcement are on standby to silence their criticisms. The world’s bankers however are laughing to the banks as all of this is built upon their banking model.[/b]
All governments start small but then individuals within them find themselves with an insatiable greed, lust, and hunger that they don’t stay small for very long. In the manufactured consent of government over the slave like populous it controls such individuals find no shortage of useful idiots to help it grow and expand.
Truth? Justice? No, those are the words employed by government and state to enslave the inhabitants that they call citizens. Science dissipates nothing. Science works in concert and as an aid in fulfilling this malaise of enslavement.
Yes, the super organism of civilization through technology has become an electronic or mechanical abomination where centered around efficiency human beings are reduced to cogs, gears, chips, and numbers in functional sequence. Function and ability the new form of identification or social existential belonging. We’ve devised the most alienating enviroment ever imagined and with a stamp of approval it is called progress.
[b]What is good? Good is illusion. Good is a facade that must die.
You say that good cannot flourish or triumph in the absence of laws but ironically in this period of large bureaucracy where there is an indefinite amount of laws everywhere it still doesn’t flourish nonetheless. Why do you think that is?
And with laws, do you honestly think you can enforce or make people be good?
[b]Chaos is the natural order and none of you charlatans want to admit such because nobody likes admitting that they’ve lost control or that there is no control to be begotten. It still hasn’t dawned on you that nature is the master of man not other men. It’s for that reason man calls it chaos as it specifically means out of the control, scope, or reach of men.
These are the kinds of thoughts that keep men like yourself sleepless and awake at late hours of the night. The unpredictability and randomness of losing all control.
Tell me, can I expect you and your kind to be in unison with chaos?
Oh, who am I kidding? You would never do that. You would be dead in less than four weeks upon that…[/b]
