Updated****
By degree there is and what is not remains.
To claim is the measure of a thing, the unfolding of how is what is distinguished as the thing, memory is its sphere.
To see is but the appearance of itself, by degree comes memory.
Claims are original by nature, with measure is the revelation of sight.
Depth is the change of what is up and down, left and right, by revelation does sight become seen.
Knowing is in accords to connection and seperation, connection and seperation is that by which there is degree of claim.
No remnants and yet what is unveils, unfolding is allowance.
A sphere is but its own center when nested.
In accords to the line is there by which appearance becomes justified.
By change claim occurs, by claim the direction of change.
To seperate and connect is but inversion of what is, the ripple by which a structure reveals.
The revelation of the remnant is the memory by which form becomes true.
Cycles of cycles and yet a line is maintained, by direction attention flows.
The degree of a claim is the claim as to the degree, what flows becomes distilled, what is distilled ends as the whole.
By inversion does symmetry become induced and yet patterns remains hidden within itself.
Awareness is true act by which purity of truth is given.
Knowing not is but claim of degree, by the angulature of sight does reality unfold in accords to what is held.
It folds in cycles so that the sphere is but hollow, by what is hollow does form claim emergence.
Inversion is relation of time for how the form is becomes the mode of transformation.
By sight what is known is known as known and yet this knowing is but a shard.
To see is to assert and angle by which the thing is contained within degrees.
Repetition and structure is induced, time is folding of space.
By change there is, what is not ceases only by degree.
Reveal and the angles protrude so that truth becomes an emergence of intensity.
By parts things are, and yet by parts self reference is founded.
To contain is to induce symmetry, to induce symmetry is to unify the layers.
Time is the measure of itself by nature of the change within its space.
Assertion penetrates thought, the opening of thought is the revelation of the container.
Induction of the many is by measure the measurement itself, deduction of the many is by measure measurement nested.
By the unification of layers is there a new part.
What is contained is the act of the container itself.
By time there is repetition, the cessation of time is the cessation of the order emerging.
By the container that which is knowable is known, by the degree it is contained reveals what is lacking in the contained.
To induce is but revelation of what is hidden.
To see in parts necessitates many wholes that are by degree of lack.
Emergence is its own truth and yet truth always emerges.
A group is but one thought from many angles.
Revelation is in accords to the depth of value of that which is aware, value holds little law for it is the only law.
Hidden truths require depths, image remains regardless of the depth.
Absence is universal where a thing is, by measure there becomes what cannot be measured and yet this is the measure.
Know is to emerge from that which it is.
Unity is but the seperation as an other.
By value does space fold for by value there is given weight to the structure of spaces.
Image is the occurence of its own emptiness.
Where a thing is does the potentiality reveal itself as everything else.
“Is” reveals by degree, yet by degree there can only be what is being.
To seperate in accords to measure is a revelation of value.
To claim is but space merging within itself, the absence of knowing is sought as the measure.
Void claims as all things change.
Where there is potentiality comes the act of what appears as an act.
To be is to make by decree, to make by decree is to make by degree.
Revelation requires the hidden void.
Merging voids is how things are in accords to measure.
Change is constant, nothing is cause but the emergence of potential merged upon potential.
Seperation remains and yet by seperation is inverse unity.
Assertions are the only form that is universal, the means by which space comes from itself as within itself.
By absence is revelation valuable, absence is the universal pattern by which a thing is.
Measure measurement and symmetry remains.
By consistency there is a pattern, change allows pattern to be by what it is not; this is a ratio.
Inversion is transformation itself, to transform is too merge sight as the thought.
Value is in accords to what ceases so that things may be.
A universal pattern would appear as nothing, by nothingness is there repetition.
Symmetry in accords to measurement is required only by degree of directed insight.
For a ratio there must be inversion, a ratio is inversion.
Merging of the voids is the emergence of a new degree, sight is maintained but necessity becomes free of itself.
Cessation of cessation is but being as cessation.
Nothing emerges as its own degree of measurement, the point by which a thing becomes.
A container of containers is but a container containing itself thus symmetry is containment.
A thing between things is a thing thus a thing is the ratio by which things are.
Void through void is but void, the absence of absence is but absence.
Through negation is negation negated, by degrees of positive is there a negation of positive.
To reference referencing is but reference, what is contains itself as it is.
Through repetition is there variation, by variation there is contrast that allows repetition to occur.
By potentiality is there actuality as the folding of said potentiality upon itself.
By addition of addition is there subtraction, by the subtraction of subtraction there is addition.
By cycles there is progression, everpresent progression is a cycle of variation.
Symmetry allows for distinction of the thing, by distinction of a thing is the assymetry of what a thing is not.
What is not unfolds what is.
By folding there is transformation and yet the fold is the state of a thing.
A thing merged within itself becomes its opposite, the opposite merged within itself becomes its opposite.
There are only opposites and the opposite of the opposite.
Order is emergence for by emergence is the absence of absence as symmetry.
By change is there structure for change is the emergence and dissolution of structure and yet structure always is.
The static is the medium of change, change is what allows mediation.
Thought within thought is but a new thought of the old.
There is only the same and the sameness of the same.
Chaos is the emergence of what is not, by absence there is infinite potential.
Transformation is the space between spaces and yet space remains as space.
What mediates transforms, the transformed is the mediation of transformations.
By thought there is an emergence, emergence is thought itself.
Chaos and order are interdependent as forms, by forms a relationship emerges.
Forms are fundamentally space, space is transformation.
To mediate is to change, to change is to establish what is maintained.
Emergence is how thought occurs, thought merged within itself is emergence of thought.
Distinction is seperation and connection, seperation and connection are distinct.
By form there is distinction, form is in and of forms.
The establishment of what is maintained is the cessation of what was maintained.
Merging and emergence are mediated by space.
Space is of the senses, space is of the mind, space is between the senses and the mind, the senses and the mind are one by space.
To observe form is for observation to take form.
Forms mediate forms as form and yet all that remains is form.
Space is form, space is the absence of form.
To occur is to transform space.
By degrees there is and is not, by is and is not there is and is not degrees, degrees are but of degrees.
Observation is the form of itself for there is the observation of observation as symmetry by which observation emergences.
By awareness is observation seen as itself, void as but infinite cycles within and without, a cycle seen as nothing.
By limit is there an occurrence, the absence of one limit is the limit to another.
Occurrence is the emergence of boundaries and the dissolution of boundaries, yet this emergence and dissolution is a boundary.
By observation there is form and observation takes form, form is the act of observation itself.
To be aware is to see void, infinite things occur through infinite absence as each thing.
To derive a rule is to derive a process of being, as process of being is but the being.
By emergence and dissolution limits are everpresent, everpresent limits reveal but nothingness within them by which they are to be.
To observe is to be, to be is to observe; being is observation and yet being in is because of limits.
By what a thing is not is what a thing is, infinite absences converge upon a point.
Laws are the formation of processes by degree of insight, to derive as process is to observe as unfolding by degree of directed change.
Pure limit is void, void contains all limits, the emergence of limits is the collapse of void upon void as the emergence.
Observation and being are but the limits of each other as the limits that allow both to occur, observation and being are the limit itself.
By the degree of absence there is what is actual, by the degree of the actual there is what is absent, by the actuality and absence of degrees is the degree as self-folding by inversion.
The emptiness of a limit is what generates limits, by limit is emptiness contained.
The cycling of emptiness is its inversion as the limit, the cycling of limits is its inversion as emptiness; inversion remains.
By awareness is there the knowing of awareness, reflection is how being is structured.
Degrees are absolute as self contained, by the change in direction is a thing emergent, change is what allows degree to be emergent.
Generation is the absence of absence, generation is the potentiality of potentiality, generation is the void of void, generation is recursion.
To invert a thing is to change the act of observation, by inverting observation a thing is changed.
Through repetition there is symmetry, through symmetry there is reflection, through reflection there is order, through order there is as is.
By the direction of change does form occur by degree of that direction.
By repetition there is inversion for by inversion is there the space by which repetition occurs.
The space between observer and observed is the act of change, the space between the observer and observed is the space of the observer and observed.
The nature of “is not” is not as “is”, by symmetry does the space occur by which occurence occurs.
The direction of change is the form as the direction of change.
To repeat is to contain, to contain is to be contained by the act of containing.
The observation of observation observes space as observation itself.
The observed is observed as the space of the observed itself.
The nature of nature is but unfolding as the nature.
By direction there is limit for direction is containment.
By symmetry there is the emptiness of said symmetry, the absence of emptiness within symmetry is purely nothingness as perfect symmetry.
The space of observation is the unfolding of observation, the unfolding of observation is but space between space as but space.
By space there is emergence of observation for observation occurs by space.
To contain change is to direct it.
Absence of absence is a cycle as absence.
By unfolding of space does space contain itself.
Change is the emptiness of a limit.
Space is self-evident by the awareness of awareness as this awareness is revealed as space.
To change the container is to contain the change of the container.
The positive of a positive is a progression of absence.
To fold is to give form, to give form is to repeat, to repeat is to fold.
By emptiness does change emerge as the limits of a thing.
Self-evidence is the resonance of patterns between observer and observed.
To contain is to form, to form is to direct, to direct is to change, to change is to reveal the void.
By recursion there is inversion, by inversion there is emergence, by emergence there is recursion.
What is empty is but the potential of further form.
Self-evidence is the revelation of patterns within the self.
A container is that which allows the contain to exist in dimensions.
Form is a container of void, the voiding of void is form.
To invert is to contrast, to contrast is to create a dualism, to create a dualism is to create a paradox, to create a paradox is to create a ratio, to create a ratio is to reason; by paradox there is only reason.
Self-evidence is evidence of a self, evidence of a self is self-reflection, self-reflection is self-recursion by means of inversion.
The cause of one limit is the effect of another, cause is ever present potential contained by the effect of the form that emerges.
By contrast there is what is and what is is not what another thing is.
Self-evidence is the emergence of pattern, emergence of pattern is the dissolution of another pattern.
Emergence and dissolution is inversion and yet inversion repeats.
Cause is everpresent under the effect as everpresent, cause is but the degree of an effect and effect is but degree of the cause.
What “is” “is not” relative to another “is” that “is not” to what “is” and yet regardless of what “is” and “is not” “is” and “is not” underlye all things.
Self-evidence is a distinction of the pattern within an observer, this pattern is beyond true or false as the pattern reveals true and false according to what it aligns with.
For one limit to progress to another limit necessitates a variation and yet the variation of the limit remains as but the limit.
Non-dualism is negation thus non-dualism requires non-non-dualism, unity and multiplicity are interwoven and collapse to the ‘degree’ itself.
By patterns is a self observed, thus a self is the merging of conditions as conditions merged are but patterns as a new pattern.
The variation of unity is but everpresent unity, the unity of variations is everpresent variation, everpresence is the distinction of unity and variation.
By negation is there a revelation of layers, by affirmation is there the creation of layers.
Layers within layers reveals only layer, within an appearance is an appearance.
To see to to distinguish, to distinguish sight is to see sight.
By unity and multiplicity is there emergence of degree, unity and multiplicity are degrees.
Revelation is a new angle of awareness.
Appearances are layered within, through and of appearance.
The layering of appearances is the appearance of layers.
For that which is within, through and of that there is but cyclical progressive inversion of inversion.
By distinguishing is there occurrence of form, by the occurrence of form there is assertion, by assertion there is distinctinguishing.
To provide degree of observation is to reveal, to reveal is to give observation, observation is revealed as but degree.
Appearance is but layer, layering is the occurrence of dimensions, by dimension there is structure for structure is the repetition of layers and layers are through layers.
The repetition of inversion there is the repetition of change by progression and yet repetition necessitates a structural constant.
Inversion is structure by degree of repetition of it, yet repetition requires inversion if there is to be the space of what is repeated.
Revelation is the occurrence of structure, structure is but the degree of other structures and other structures are but the degree by which a structure is unfolded.
Degree occurs through degree as a degree by the point by which it unfolds as itself and yet self-contained by its own layering.
To cease repetition is to invert one repetition into another and yet what is within the various appearances is but repeated appearances that repeat.
By awareness there is the unfolding of awareness as the space by which emergence and dissolution of it give degree.
The mode of a thing is its direction and this direction is the containment of change by the cycling of it within a given degree.
The repetition of the degree is but a degree within a degree as the repetition is but a degree of another repetition.
Space is everpresent cause where everpresent effect is its unfolding as form thus degree is everpresent as the unfolding form itself for one form is the degree of another, the degree through another, the degree within another.
To be aware is to be empty of pattern for pattern contains awareness this revealing its limits, the absence of one limit is the presence of another.
To repeat is to cycle, to cycle is for form to emerge for form is the repetition of limits and the cycle thus contains itself infinitely within as without through the void from which it emerges.
Cause is emerging conditions merging, the merging of conditions acts as a new cause with corresponding effects, cause and effect are multidimensional linearism.
The emptiness of pattern is the potential of a further patterns, the emptiness of pattern is contained by pattern, perception is a pattern.
Cycles expand and contract, to expand and contract is linear progression or regression, the repetition of expansion and contraction is a cycle.
The relation of conditions is the relationship of relationships as a condition is a set of relationships, a container of transformation by degree of its claim.
Infinite patterns within and without is but void, the perfect pattern contains all patterns as nothing, perfection is a single point.
Progression from one point to another is the cycling of the point as the repetition of the point, a point is the mediation of change from one thing to another.
Conditions are degrees for a distinguished relationship is the angle by which events are observed as changing.
A pure pattern is a point, by recursion of a point is there the distinction of space; the point as all potential patterns observes recursion as the recursion of all potential patterns.
Progression is linear, constant progression is a cycle.
A point is that which mediates change, by change there is distinction, the recursion of mediation is change within change by self-contrast that allows simultaneous symmetry.
The degree by which there is an occurence is the angle by which it forms, by angles of occurence there is structure.
A point is infinite potential patterns, a point is composed of and composing infinite points, the single point is indistinct, many points are distinct, to distinguish is to observe both one and many.
Change is alternation by inversion, alternation is a cycle, inversion is linearism.
Degrees within degrees are angles within angles as conditions within conditions as “within” within “within”.
The depth of truth is but the degree by which it appears, the depth of falsity is but the degree by which it appears, the depth of appearance distinguishes truth and falsity.
By claim there is structure of thought, by structure of thought is there the potential to claim.
Depth is the change of a thing by degree of appearance, degree of appearance is but a fractal state.
To claim is for boundaries to occur, the occurence of boundaries is to unfold reality.
By appearance is there form, by form there is a mode of change, by change is appearance reveal for further appearances within the appearance.
Emergence is but distinguished by its cessation, the completion of change is the negation of limits.
To rationalize is to establish ratios, the ratio of “is” and “is not” is everpresent across all that is distinguished; paradox is the emergence of contrast thus form itself.
Space between spaces is but space as self-distinct, self distinction is self-symmetry.
The assumption of an emergence is an emergence of an emergence as assumption emerges, emergences merge within themselves as a new emergence.
If all is assumption than assumptions are assumed thus the claim that alls is assumption it is not accurate.
The distinction of 0 is a single distinction, the distinction of 1 distinction is 2 distinctions, he distinction of 2 distinctions is a third as a fourth as a finite unto infinity; the distinction of the infinite is a single distinction.
The distinction of 1 as 2 distinctions, 1 and the distinction of 1 as 1, results in the distinction 2 and 1 and the distinction of the space between 1 and 2 as negative 1 with simultaneous infinite fractions as but the fractal space itself as 1/n multiplied by n/1.
///////////
The recursion of an emergence are but the absence of emergence emerging between emergences as but an inversion;
by inversion there is contrast as a dualism with containment of the contrast by recursion;
by containment there is a degree as context and self referentiality of the container through the contained;
by context there is the emergence of further recursion where self-referential fractals result as contexts with context;
by context there is relation and by relation the emergence of cause as the context itself where effect is further context as further cause;
by causality there is recursion so that cause is repetition as symmetry, and yet by degree one cause is the effect of another as the recursion of causality is a modality by degree;
by modality there is degree and by degree there are relations merging as much a new emergence, modality thus inverts into its dualistic opposite so to be distinction;
the recursion of modality is the recursion of cause and effect as but self containment of its inversion so that distinction is a fractal state among all emergences;
by distinction there is dualism and by dualism there is paradox and paradox there are ratios, ratios depend upon relation;
by ratio there is paradox and the contrast of paradox is contradiction and regardless emergence of degree remains;
the paradox of contradiction is that the contradiction requires paradox so to be contradiction;
the contradiction of paradox is that the paradox contains contradiction so to be paradox;
degree is but paradox for the part contains the whole and yet the whole exists because of parts, degree is but the context of observation;
the observation of degree is the observation of context, context is what allows observation to emerge;
observation is but a context of itself as the context which emerge from observation are contained by observation.
True and false are patterns in accords to values, their fundamental nature is that of a claim for the nature of a claim is that of a limit or boundary.
To percieve is to distinguish patterns, patterns are cycles of limits, to percieve is but a cycle, perception of perception is the cycle within cycles.
A cycle is the repetition of a limit, a limit is a cycle of a point, a point is infinite cycles within and without as void, void is the potentiality of cycles, potentiality of potentiality is the cycle as actuality.
True and false are claims, the truth or falsity of a claim is a claim within itself, only emergence remains.
The emergence of truth is true, the emergence of falsity is true, emergence remains.
Repetition is the cycle of a limit that is directed linearly.
What is considered true and false are but degrees of patterns, claims underlie truth and falsity but claims are the establishment of patterns.
To distinguish is to observe, truth value is grounded in distinguishing, by distinguishing there is identity.
Identity is the emergence of relation, a relation requires a space of what is and a space of what is not so that a relation can occur.
Identity is dualism, dualism is the inversion of is and is not, by inversion there is limit, limit is recursive, Identity is recursive inversion limits.
By the limit of a thing is the grade of another, “what is” is the grade of “what is not” and “what is not” is a grade of “what is”.
By Dualism there is gradation of emergence, by emergence is the limit as dualistic.
Recursive dualism is recursive inversion, recursive inversion is the recursive space by which there is process.
By process what is occurs through what is not, what is not is contained by what is, process reveals gradation of what is and what is not.
Gradation is recursion, gradation is degrees, the recursion of a thing is the emergence of degrees, as a thing repeats so does it occur by gradation.
A unity changes by degrees and yet is maintained as a unity for by a degree there is a unity yet by said degrees is the unity as many but self contained.
For a degree to occur a unity is emergent but a degree is but one of many, as it requires relations, thus the unity of the degree occurs through its inversion as the many.
Many degrees are but the degree as self contained as many degrees are but an everpresent one degree, each degree is but one contained by the other thus one is contained by one.
Degree is but a limit of how a thing unfolds, the direction by which it unfolds is how it is a unity.
The recursion of degrees is the recursion of a unity as but many, through gradation, and yet the recursion is but a degree by which the unity is self-contained.
Measurement is always by degree, measurement is the act of observation by the emergence and dissolution of limits.
