Delusions of grandeur

Philosophy Forums Psychology and Mind
1

I’ve spent several years on other forums trying to learn and better myself and it seems apparent to me now that many of the places I frequented are infested with very deranged and sinister people…

I’m curious what others think about what I’ve learned about the psychological state of humanity from them…

First off, the definition of “good” is apparently “that which is desirable and/or acceptable…”

If humanity is abusing and slaughtering billions of acceptable/good beings, doesn’t that make them bad/evil? And if humanity designed their civilizations to force everyone to serve, support and pleasure billions of such bad/evil people, doesn’t that make them even worse? How can a species be considered good if they are attacking and destroying good while serving, pleasuring and fighting for evil?

So, if humanity is basically evil and thinks they are good/acceptable, doesn’t that suggest they are delusional and lacking intelligence (mentally handicapped)?

If you can’t even grasp the basics of good and bad or right and wrong, how can you be considered intelligent life?

So, is humanity a bunch of mentally handicapped animals lost in delusions of grandeur?

2

“it” in “the right to claim it” in the quote below is “being good”

The rest of my reply that is quoted is also relevant.

3

We are animals and eat other animals, as animals do. This is neither good nor bad, this is life.

4

Yeah so nobody should be traveling faster than they can walk, swim, or run. Just forget paddling a boat or riding a bike without a motor. And don’t even get me started on things that have actual motors. Rockets? Airplanes? Bullet trains? All meat should be eaten raw. Batteries are sacrilege. Even trying to redirect sunlight into a focused spot to make fire is playing with fire.

5

Is that so? So then after all, who wins the race, the rabbit or the hare?

That goes to say a lot for people on the job penalized for taking a few minutes more on their break.

Better go slow and easy

6

A point I made elsewhere:

7

the tortoise

8

Did it on purpose, must’ve, point counterpoint
, or, the picture covers it as a diversion? ,a trifle, to allude the chaos of inverse paradigmns.

Why here and now?
To bear the significance , through willing signifiers?

()()()

The three metamorphoses of men: the children of the last men

()()

grin and bear it if you can

()

no easy trick, before simulation.

As it reconnects with it’s nemesis: ha ha

9

Thanks, Ishthus,slipped here, as usual- fear of exposure of the synthetic sympathy for both sides of the equation?

Like that creature at see? The unthinkable mollly brown hahaha

But enuff if this nonsense promise not to touch upon ever and never

and then the punch-he who last laughs lasts…?- out line

10

Ok you got me

11

Zzzzzzzzzzzz.

12

™)Ichthus77Regular

15h

the tortoise

Ok you got me,

)()(

()(()(())

image
image3024×4032 2.57 MB

Ps I’m not him not even the two John’s, just following to bear double cross to be with Him in Paradise.

)()(

Mains of our Father(s) 4 given