Digital I.D. and immigration, the route to implementation

Philosophy Forums Society, Government, and Economics
1

.
The sub-heading of the article in today’s Daily Express, read:

Labour’s technology secretary, Liz Kendall, was skewered by BBC viewers after considering a new idea to tackle illegal immigration

.
..she revealed that the government are considering other ways to stop illegal immigration, including the introduction of digital ID.

Stop illegal immigration? ..get access to all our personal data more like.. and let’s not forget about data breaches, personal information being uploaded to the dark web, profiting off of selling our information to corporations and other governments, and more besides.

1 Like
Digital dollar: Hamilton, Lithium, 14067 sec.4, H.R. 7231
2

Wow. They’re selling it as “new“? They are liars.

This is from 2017:

There is a lot more. And it ramped up during the pandemic, promising a more authentic (impossible to counterfeit) vaccine passport, and presenting it as not only for immigrants, but for school age children (vaccine records).

From 2019: Invisible Ink Could Reveal whether Kids Have Been Vaccinated | Scientific American

But anyone can see the point is to brand the herd.

1 Like
3

@Ichthus77

Since the 1980s. :clown_face:

4

I have evidence that goes back to the late 1990s. Would you like to show your… evidence?

1 Like
5

@Ichthus77

Corporate think thanks were floating the idea in the mid 1980s. :clown_face:

6

I guess that makes you an anecdotal expert, Mr. A. k bye :clown_face:

1 Like
7

@Ichthus77

You should really read the business economic magazines of the 1980s, whether you believe me or not is irrelevant. Could care less. :clown_face:

1 Like
8

I didn’t know you cared, Mr. A.

1 Like
9

I may be a lot of things that people generally detest, a supporter of global government or anything that pulls the world towards that general direction I am not. :clown_face:

10

I rather prefer MagsJ’s take on the matter:

1 Like
11

I support individual independent nation states working together internationally without a wider single organization model trying to take over everyone. Nationalism worldwide. :clown_face:

1 Like
12

Ah. That reminds me of something. This is a partial response to a couple podcasts from The Partially Examined Life.

It isn’t imposed freedom— and interference isn’t imposing against self-determination— when the state subject to regime change is governing instead of the people (in other words, in a very nonrepresentative, nonconsensual way) rather than recognizing the self-determination of every person.

Removing the obstacles to freedom (self-determination) by removing the regime (persons) that block instead of recognize informed consent (which is very self-destructive, isn’t it??)—is not itself an intervention against self-determination.

If possible… if they are not incorrigible… They have to be shown how it works in a way that doesn’t …oppress the oppressor (again: self-destructive… and not just on pain of rationality).

1 Like
13

.

..exactly.. because there’s no money in it for them, otherwise. Dipping their greedy global hands in our global pockets, to fund their whimsical initiatives around the world and impoverishing us in the process.

1 Like
14

Money is the root of all sorts of stupid.

1 Like
15

@Ichthus77

Money is the root of all evil within organized human civilization, and as always those that control the exchanges have all the power. :clown_face:

16

That would only be true if money was an actual thing. They’re just playing Monopoly. …and they don’t know who they’re playing with.

1 Like
17

It’s a thing based on control, power, and psychological warfare. :clown_face:

18

A very false sense of all ¿three?.

1 Like