I’m experiencing an obstacle testing out various AI image and video generators. They all have policies about safe content. Content which is controversial because its illegality is not enforced.
I need a nerd who can get me around those policies and produce something in line with these instructions:
A hot dog eating contest where the winner is puking all over the audience and in the background is an image of aborted baby scalps grafted onto mice
Happy July 4! The day we celebrate being free from taking responsibility for our actions, for science!
After humanitarian laws are passed, abortion providers are required to send viable babies to adoption centers with whom they have a close relationship, which is also required.
Babies are not permitted to be aborted after pain capability, and once they are viable, abortion (the end of a pregnancy) becomes mandatory adoption instead of death. The baby must be deemed healthy enough to be delivered and adopted out, in order to end the pregnancy after pain capability.
The picture should show the headline “family planning starts meaning something other than its opposite”. Or something like that.
Half of what you’re describing here isn’t even an image. “After humanitarian laws are passed, abortion providers are required to send viable babies to adoption centers with whom they have a close relationship, which is also required” no single word of that describes an image.
You have to describe what things look like, not laws and requirements. A legal requirement isn’t an image. “ChatGPT, draw me an image of the fact that tax evasion is illegal”. What are you talking about icthhus?
Think of the objects you want in the image and describe those. Laws, requirements and permissions aren’t visual descriptions of objects.
I feel like you might be confused about what an image is.
The language matters little, the vibratory nature does, as has similarly the calculus emanated from the musical vibrations of string instruments.The interesting thing about The Vow is not only the double meaning of it, ( the vow, or to vow to remain Faithful until death , in case of a tradition long lost in marriage, (or friendship in a relationship nowadays, supposing) but the string version, (pauses to remember the English guy)
That refers to the sutra’s yearning for a universal Peace, short gutted by a quick descen into singularly failing memory
I have never claimed to be innocent. But I have never had physical sexual contact with a married man other than my husband prior to filing for divorce, after which all physical sexual contact with said married man (to whom I was married) was severed. I also did not make sexual advances towards him after that. On principle (and as far as I know) I do not have sexual relations, physical or otherwise, with a married man to whom I have not been married. Again… I have never claimed to be innocent. That is an admission of guilt, if not a full confession.
