I belong to the elite victim-class. Iâm a black paraplegic obese single mother.
I am lord of the victims.
My advantage is that I can make any comment, using any language, and will not be reprimanded.
The only reason Carleas sends me board warnings is because he didnât know of my nature.
But now he does.
If this were so, this conversation would be over. The buck stops with me, but Iâm sensitive to the values and goals of the community, and Iâm open to persuasion. We are discussing what we should do. I but pull the levers.
Sure, but⌠so what? If the threads need fact checking and context, fact check them and add context. Weâre none of us professionals, so maybe CNN is the wrong thing to compare ourselves to, but we can link to Wikipedia, and that seems to be the level of fact checking it takes (see this very thread).
If you donât feel like it, then donât.
If the threads are of the âincendiary racismâ variety, report them and Iâll warn/ban people.
But Judaism did emerge within specific tribes, ergo the narrative about the 12 tribes, with a 13th African one.
Iâve said elsewhere, memes are gene specific, in their origins.
Part of the Jewish survival strategy is living parasitically, and so merging with the target host is essential for their strategy to work. So they are matrilineal because the mother is sure of her childrenâs origins, and a male is not.
They inherit their Jewishness from the mother, allowing them to mix the hostâs genes into their own so as to hide and to appropriate, remaining always distinct and identifying only with their own.
Many Jews admit this.
They play with vagueness so as to remain obscure.
Sometimes they claim to be a religion, other times that they are a race.
Their marriage practices has produced inbreeding - producing distinct physical characteristics and psychological attitudes - neurosis is one example.
A few posts ago, there was some important work going on here:
" For one thing, people do sometimes change their mind in response to reason. But more importantly, society needs to make explicit the reasons why bad ideas are wrong. If we canât discuss them, if no one can defend them, then we wonât discover the rebuttals, and our noble beliefs will be fragile and vulnerable to simple questioning. The discussion isnât only about convincing the other people in the discussion, itâs about crystallizing our own ideas, which, once explicit, can be shared like antibodies."
Now itâs âso what?â
I have tried, but I found that those guys prefer to live in their own cocoons.
Although I am not here to convince those too far gone to be convinced by anythingâŚI only mention Tucker Carlsonâs recent report on Singerâs practices.
Parasitism. He would not do this to Israeli towns, because he identifies with the people there.
Their history is well known. Expelled from hundreds of placesâŚ.dabbling in occultism to exploit human feebleness, like Gypsies - another tribe that practices parasitical survival strategies.
Google what the Romans, and other famous minds, had to say about them.
They canât all be jealous and bigots.
Now Iâm done with its subject.
If people cannot even see or admit who dominates US political and cultural discourse, then nothing I can say will change their minds.
I wont even try. It would be a waste of my time.
Wow, so Gloominary and Aegean also disagree about the genetics, since Gloominary claims that Jewish populations are particularly insular and donât mix with neighboring populations, and Aegean thinks Jewish people are absorbing neighboring populations like the alien from the movie Species. It seems pretty clear that you arenât talking about the same group, like maybe your hatred and suspicion of this abstract and inconsistently defined group doesnât really have anything to do with a group, so much as with the people who latch on to them as boogeymen.
Or rather, sometimes people disparaging them claim that theyâre an ideology, and other times that theyâre a genetic line capable of inbreeding etc. You know Aegean, itâs almost like youâre playing with vagueness in order to remain obscure.
Is it white people? Theyâre almost all the consumers and almost all the producers, so itâs probably white people.
Go ahead and show us that big open mind of yours.
By that I mean, whatâs the action that follows from that? We arenât CNN, we donât have people on staff or on call to rebut positions that need context and fact-checking. So, what do we do? I offered what I think follows from that (provide context, or ignore, or report). What are you saying follows?
Wow, indeedâŚyour understanding is and was of a monolithic monstrosity.
You are totally indoctrinated.
Is Islam a race?
I am being very clearâŚonly you want to remain in vagueness.
People want to remain on a very simple level, because this is more sophisticated. We are dealing with a very clever parasitical strategy, based on the manipulation of language and the concepts they refer to. Very few, on both sides of the debate, fully understand it.
See Schlomo and others on the matter of Jews as a race. There are many others, Jews predominately, because gentiles do not dare. You can do the researchâŚ'cause I do not care. You think in bad faith. There is no evidence, no argument, no reason, that will ever convince you away from your accepted âwe are all equalâ ideology.
To think otherwise is, for you, a statement of violence and genocide.
There is no âwhiteâ raceâŚno more than there is a black one, or a yellow one. Pigmentation is one trait, among many, that identifies species and sub-species, i.e., breeds, kinds, racesâŚetc.
There are Indo-Europeans, Afro-Asiatic, Africans, AsiansâŚ
White, black beige are simplifications and part of the indoctrination you have surrendered to.
Europeans are not superior in processing and pattern recognition intelligence. The Asians are. This is not about supremacy.
The Polar Bear is not simply a white bear.
A Grizzly is not a Brown bear.
A black bear is another species = other than a polar bear - not only because its fur is another colouration.
An elephant is not a grey species.
What differentiates a panda from a koala is not its fur colouring alone.
Such sarcasm exposes stress.
I suspect you cannot explain how speciation or how intelligence evolves, given your views on uniformity.
Your well-informed, fair, enlightened, altruistic beliefs âdebunkâ evolution theory.
Congratulations.
We return to God made us in his image.
Unless, of course, you want to explain why appearances do not matter, only when it comes to our species, and how intelligence evolved, at all, if it is evenly and fairly distributed in a population.
Were all species the product of nurturing, and social engineering, ro a willful agency?
If so say so. Admit it.
By the wayâŚif this exchange did not involve youâŚyou would be sending me a warning, and banning me.
This is how fair and open-minded and enlightened you truly are.
Why not just admit that you want to preserve your Americanised, melting pot, we are all equal under the lawstatus quo, and live in peace?
Aegean, youâre still arguing with memes about millennial SJWs. Youâre arguing against a straw version of a liberal, which should make you concerned that you arenât considering the best arguments for the positions you disagree with. I basically accept what appear to be your premises, and I still conclude that being a racist is at best factually wrong, and at worst morally wrong.
But here, Iâm just pointing out the surface-level problem with your position that you donât seem to know whether youâre talking about a religion or a race, and you switch between them when itâs convenient. And now it looks like your racial metaphysics have deeper problems, since you reject whiteness as a coherent concept, but not jewishness? And then instead you want to talk about Europeans (population 741 million) and Asians (population 4.4 billion) as though those are comparably fine-grained classifications among humans, and we can just assume that the shape of the curve on any particular trait is roughly identical.
Just chronologically in your life, did you learn about biology first, or start being suspicious of Jews first? Did you come to your beliefs about Jews before all the very sophisticated thinkery you use to justify it, or were you a âwe are all equalâ type until you learned you some semiotics and it just dawned on you: all the racist shit about Jews that people have been saying for centuries is actually very insightful social critique! I have a hard time believing that it went that way.
This is how you show how intellectually dishonest you are.
As if I did not make it clearâŚas if I said nothing at all. YesâŚit is I who is confused. Ha!!!
Is Christianity a race? Is Islam a race? Is Hinduism a race? Then how is Judaism a race?
It emerges within a specific race and a tribe, the Semites, but then evolvesâŚand Semites include Arabs. Are Arabs all Jews? Is an anti-Semite also anti-Islam?
Start with Schlomo Sands⌠youtube.com/watch?v=1EmvANgw9Mk
Youâre indoctrinated into a way of thinking and cannot be bothered to even begin to question it. This is common in every age, across time and place.
You debunking Evolution Theory is a formidable feat of indoctrination.
Donât think you have an answer to the question:
How did intelligence evolve prior to civilization or in species other than humans
if it is evenly distributed, and a product of social nurturing? Is intelligence socially selected?
Maybe we can adopt Brianâs bullshyte and claim that there are different kinds of intelligence.
Iâm pretty sure the authors/editors of this page are feminized abrahamonihilistic leftist cucks without fathers who are conspiring with the zionists to invert the noetic flux into an absolute⌠but Iâm not positive, so I figured Iâd let you all look at it.