Anyone ever hear of these two wonderful things? Here in the USA our govt. has declared DMSO as a solvent.
do some indepth research on these two things. I have become a big fan of DMSO I have used it and seen it work so much better than what our govt approves of via the good old FDA.
Read up on it, I will wait.
I’ve heard of DMSO, not MSM.
DMSO is a solvent, whether the US government declares it or not. The first paragraph on wiki says “… this colorless liquid is an important polar aprotic solvent that dissolves both polar and nonpolar compounds and is miscible in a wide range of organic solvents as well as water.”
Step away from wiki. It is a solvent but, it also has so much more to it… MSM is derived from DMSO. I have used DMSO by itself on animals, tumors, infections, intestinal issues, regenerating skin and nerve damage on a cat. If you go past wiki just google the crap out ofit. It is an antioxidant. It has been used across the world. Start your research with DMSO cancer cure or tissue repair. I started with nerve damage. I kept finding more questiions and more answers. DMSO has been used to facilitate curing a cancer. 90% survival rate. The FDA shut the facility down, they used 1/10th the amount of chemotherapy and so reduced the cost of treatment.
Really seriously study this stuff you will find it interesting and you will question the govt actions.
So, should the US government deny that it’s a solvent? Which solvents should they declare are solvents? It’s a commercial, industrial solvent. Even the most far-out DMSO-is-a-miracle-cure-for-everything sites call it a solvent.
From what’s available on the net, it looks like yet another fringe wonder cure that’s being mercilessly suppressed by Big Pharma ™. Lots of exclamation marks, plenty of anecdotal evidence and scare statistics, not much in the way of conclusive double-blind studies. The FDA approved it for treating a condition where there’s reasonable clinical evidence it works.
If it’s been used across the world, and most countries with publically-funded/subsidised healthcare systems have a vested interest in keeping costs down, one would expect it to be mainstream medicine in, say, Europe. China would be well up for its state medical system advertising amazing 90% cancer cure rates at a fraction of the cost of the west. Is that the case?
To get something approved and mainstreamed as a cancer cure you need to invest a huge amount of money. If the substance is not patentable, the players with that kind of money will not invest. Sometimes they will find a substance that does kill cancer cells. What the companies do is change the chemicals slightly, trying to find one that is as good at killing cancer cells but which they can then patent. If the ‘artificial’ chemicals - either because they are isolated from companion chemicals (the case in a lot of anti-cancer plants) or simply because the slight changes have messed up the cancer killing properties - do not work, the companies stop the research, generally at the in vitro stage. The idea that workable alternative cancer cures should slide into the mainstream because really the scientific method will show they work misses that money drives this industry and money, large amounts, is needed to demonstate these cures work to governmental satisfaction. Setting aside the huge PR work the pharmaceutical companies do to make anything alternative look bad and also the way governments go after alternative practitioners.
I think these things can work and work well, DMSO with a number of other products since it can enhance the effects. One caution about DMSO. It is a super solvent, which means that if it is not packaged well, it will dissolve its packaging. It will also take in parts of many things it comes in contact with during the manufacturing process. I would want to make sure that the manufacturers are real experts and are aware of the potential problems. I am sure some are, but figuring out which ones may not be so easy. Otherwise you may solve one problem short term and create another at the same time.
That is very true Moreno. I use only veterinary approved. From my research the suppression here is indeed monetary motivated. Incredible research is being done across the world. By itself and the MSM derivative, the potentials to cure and drop health costs is phenomenal. While it is a solvent it goes beyond. A cat had its skin ripped off its face. As a feral curing in a coventional way was impossible. My boss and I had about given up till I ran across DMSO repairing nerves and curing arthritic symptoms. Two years we have worked on this cat that no vet would help due to its violent nature. I have swabbed his wounds with prescribed and OTC meds with little improvement. In 7 treatments his wounds are nearly gone. Now tell me, what solvent can do that? His nerves are healed he no longer scratches himself raw. He can feel when something touches the new skin. Just a solvent? Tumors on animals will disapear. Internally it attacks virus and bacteria. Side affects? A nasty sulphur garlic taste in your mouth temporarily.
That’s all well and good, but absolutely not the idea that I was presenting.
clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00218829
webmd.com/vitamins-supplemen … LSULFOXIDE.aspx?activeIngredientId=874&activeIngredientName=DMSO%20(DIMETHYLSULFOXIDE)
OH, I understand what you are saying. There is alot of crackpot crap out there. But, there are an equal amount of valid sites and supportive documentation.
I am using a phone for my research, I am limited on bookmarks abd favorites. These two sites started me off in valid directions. I began this search because it was prescribed by a very reliable vet for a horse. My curiosity started the search. I am not an idiot I can tell hype when I see it. I can also tell when something is being suppressed. Its not a cure all but, used correctly it comes damn close. It costs me 5$ for 4 oz. gel of it. You don’t use alot per treatment, less than 1/8 tsp. in most cases. One container has treated 6 animals for different problems successfully and its a 99.9% pure DMSO. It has been mistested puposely. One test done that was backed by the gov/pharm dipped dogs fully into vats of it daily for a month. Some dogs ended up with hardened corneas. Cripes Vitamins will screw you up worse than that if you OD. But this test was considered valid by the govt to prove the dangers of DMSO because the one using voluntary prisoners backfired.
Egads hair is growing back on portions of the cat’s wound area and full feeling has come back. He is right now a month away from being released. Waiting for cold weather, insect hibernation and complete skin regrowth. Daaaamn I love it when I can see things get better.
What is it derived from Kris… is it plant-based?
It is a by-product of making trees, pine trees, into paper. They make literally tons of it, It is pure plant product. They do add fillers to much of it. The pure is almost as inexpensive as the not pure.
Most is used for veterinary medicine worldwide. I wi
sh I had thought to take before and after photos of Frankenstein.
What claims the FDA as a reason for not allowing it?
The test I mentioned was used to keep it from being approved, it can’t be patented, licensed or trademarked, Those are the primary reasons. It is approved for veterinary use and limited human use only as a solvent.
I might get some… just in case 
Hope you like garlic with a hint of copper 
Mint or Aloe helps with the taste.