I have in my head an inexpressible conception of the world. It sways and varies a bit depending on my mood and things like that. As I grow I have altered certain aspects of it but it seems to remain there, outside of the amalgamation of myself at the distance in which I first became apparent with it (which was in a pot fueled cerebral glimpse at the pre-transient). Who here is religious basically? I mean… who approaches the world with complete doubt as opposed to ‘buying in’ to a conceptual system, even if it is there own?
In this way I feel truth as something beyond me and the physical world I see with my eyes, but also something which is not objective in the sense that I am seeing (and likely will till I die) a distorted version of it, and I feel like that distorment is what drives the universe.
Now all of that is just common language version of philosophy that’s long been overexpoused*, what my question actually gets at is the daily application of such a conceptual outlook. In other words, forget logic, do you ever find yourself reading a certain philosophy and trying to tweak certain aspects of it so that they will fit into -your- system? Sort of akin to trying to cram puzzle peices that are ‘close enough’ to the shape? Do you ever read something that you can’t really seem to poke too many holes in but just sort of dismiss it from interest because you can’t incorporate it into your personal conception?
Ya-knowhamean?
(edit to include this: Is ‘expoused’ a word? I thought it meant like bringing into view from examination but I can’t actually seem to find it on dictionary.com or answers.com … hmmmm)