I do not condone the use of LSD.
āI read the first half of a book and I hated how it ended!ā
Itās cute when people say caffeine and alcohol are ādrugsā.
.
Thereās more Important things to not condone, than half an acid tab.
.
ā¦hardly āsex drugs and rock n rollā is it. 
Lol.. I like the analogy, but I know myself very well and I also donāt step in the same river twice.
.
..donāt you think that if I had any interest in drugs, Iād have done them regardless?
Plus, I prefer to play around with my physical.. coz my mental plays around, all by its-self.. tripping off air, and life itself. 
Acid is accurately named. Take it if you want to dissolve your mind. Many idiots do.
Isnāt anything that alters the psyche, classed as a drug?
.
ā¦coz somethingās gotta define what they are.
Lolololā¦ then call me a non-idiot, whilst also telling me how wise I am. 
.
Iāve been offered loads of free drugs throughout my life, but they always came with clauses. 
Tylenol is also a drug. These substances are drugs.
But when it comes to mind-altering substances, alcohol ā¦pretty sure thatās a drug. ā¦and poison.
Like I said. Cute.
I had to edit it because my first reply sounded like I might condone it. But I definitely do not. My original comment basically said that you probably found it boring because there wasnāt any actual acid on the tab. Which is not to say āhey LSD is interesting, go do it.ā I did not want to be misinterpreted, so I edited my reply to be absolutely clear I do not condone LSD. It backfired, because you still misinterpreted me. I was not trying to make you feel bad about dropping (using) acid. I am almost positive you didnāt. The intent was there, but that wasnāt even what I was talking about. Besides, I actually have used acid, so why would I condemn you for something that I myself have done? Granted, I would never do it again.
I do not condone indiscriminate sex or illegal drugs, but ā¦I definitely condone rock ānā roll. Part of me wishes that condoning rock n roll was the only thing I said this entire reply.
Caffeine maybe, but alcohol? In terms of mental and physical effects, risk, and social cost, alcohol is easily on par with plenty of substances that are typically considered drugs, e.g. marijuana, amphetamines, cocaine, opium.
Is illegality or cultural perception part of your definition of drugs?
Just to be clear about how empty the claim that āmany idiots doā, it is absolutely the case that the vast majority of idiots donāt take LSD.
More meaningful is that many smart and accomplished people do: from a quick search, Jobs and Gates, Feynman, multiple Nobel Prize winners. And most meaningful is that some of them credit LSD with inspiring their successes ā Jobs is the obvious one here, but apparently Francis Crick came up with the DNA double helix while on LCD.
Hallucinogens have a long history, theyāre a human universal, and where they were used historically their users were frequently revered as shamans or prophets. Many religions have not-so-subtle references to hallucinogen usage, so itās likely that a good portion of the worlds religious beliefs have their origin in a dawn age trip.
More speculative is the idea that hallucinogen use was responsible for our transition into self-awareness.
In any case, I think the idiots who write them off completely are wrong (as are the brilliant and successful people who do the same).
Sorry, I was being flip.
I havenāt tried acid, Iām drawing inferences from psilocybin, a.k.a. āmagic mushroomsā (Iām under the impression itās a similar experience; can @Mr_Reasonable confirm?).
With mushrooms, a small dose means all the side effects without much or any of what people are talking about when they recommend trying mushrooms. You get nauseous and confused, but your close enough to normal thinking to be afraid of how itās changed the way your mind works and to worry that youāve broken yourself. Itās several hours of sick, scared, anxious confusion. Thatās different in kind from a full dose that pushes your mind through that into the interesting parts of reconceptualizing and self-discovery, and the calm contentment that lasts for a long while after the experience.
Iām not sure that variations in dosage work the same way in acid ā this article suggests that LSD response is more consistent between doses, though āego-dissolutionā is significantly greater at higher doses and is probably a large part of the appeal.
Iāll tell you my secret of drugs.
I smoke cigarettes and drink to not destroy whole universes on a whim.
It calms the spirits. Every spirit is different.
When I drink I donāt have blackouts, anger issues, or hangovers.
When I stop drinking, I destroy cosmoses.
If youāre going to judge me for thisā¦
You better be prepared.
Everyoneās biochemistry is different.
Iāve met many people I have to protect because they canāt handle their substances of choice.
Substances like these pull people into different dimensions.
You have to meet them where they are, say, a meth addict (which is very common). I just tell them I like their tenacity. I have no problem with them, they have no problem with me.
What I mean by ādrugā is the severity of its effect to distort. Something that makes you truly drugged. The power to distort beyond just feeling a little buzz or feeling more relaxed. Granted, alcohol taken in large quantities will qualify as drugging you. Then again you could drink so much water that it drugs you too, right before it kills you. The point of a substance being a drug or not has little to do with whether or not you can consume large enough quantities of it to induce those effects, more to do with the inherent properties of the substance itself to induce that effect even in quite low quantities. More of āitās in the very nature of the thing itselfā rather than āhey look if I seriously over-consume this look what it does to meā kind of thing. Feel free to disagree with that idea, I really donāt mind. I see your point as well, I simply choose to adhere to my own because I see it is closer to the phenomenological core of the meaning in question.
About acid, I meant that people who take acid are stupid. Is that clear enough? Even worse, using acid will make you even stupider. I suppose thereās a threshold of sorts beyond which you are already stupid enough to do something that will make you even stupider, but you just donāt care or arenāt able to see it. I really donāt care about name dropping some famous dudes who supposedly used acid. Being famous doesnāt equate to being not stupid. And even not stupid people can do stupid things. But Iāve seen the effects first hand enough times and I can understand precisely what is going on. But like before, feel entirely free to disagree. Thatās your right as a human being.
Alcohol makes people stupid. Thatās why there is a legal limit to how much you can have in your bloodstream when you drive. Something tells me you exceed that limit on the regular. For example, last night when you were drunk posting.
I exceed that ālimitā all the time, like right now for example.
Problem?
Yes. 
Prediction. If you keep posting and drinking, your posts will get stupider and stupider as the night progresses.
More like, they will get more and more epic. It does tend to happen.
I can see how, from your perspective, something epic would just look stupid to you. Confusing your own lack of insight, creativity, intelligence, philosophical potency, scope of being, for that of another person because of your own failure to seeā¦ I should add that to my fallacies list, now that I think about it.
Blindness Fallacy: when you fail to see or appreciate the meaning, significance and/or truth of something because of your own blindness and then you project that lack of meaning/significance/truth onto the other person.