Dual Lattice Transcendental Logic

Dual Lattice Transcendental Logic

“=” equivalence

“->” therefore, transitioning to

“>” greater than

“=/=” inequality

“-” negation, absence

“<->” if and only if

“( )” context, set

“…” continuum, regress/progress

(A=A)

*** A is A, A equals A. The nature of the identity law is identity by degree of self-symmetry, a tautological loop, by which the law of identity itself is emergent recursion as the distinction of said emergence.

(A=A)=B

****The law of identity is subject to being a variable.

(B=B) = (C, (A=A))

**** The law of identity, as a variable, is both ruther subject to the law of identity as recursive and is the law of identity; the law of identity holds at different scales.

((B=B) = (A=A)) = ((A=A)=(A=A))

(C=C) = (D, (B=B))

->…

(X=X) = (X2, (X1=X1))

****Scale invariance occurs for the law of identity.

(A=B=C=…X) = (A=A) = (B=B) = (C=C) =… (X=X)

A= (A → …X…)

**** The law of identity contains itself and by said self-embedding results in a continuum. This continuum is both composed of further continuums and effectively is a process of continuity. Each relative finite continuum is the law of identity, by recursion, and is the process of identity.

A = ((A → A) → …A)

****A variable is a self-referential process.

(A → A) = (A > A)

****A variable as a process necessitates its identity as change where it becomes relatively greater than itself.

(A =/= A) = -(A = A)

***A variable greater than itself is not equal to itself and as not equal to itself is the negation of identity.

(-A =/= A) = (-(A=A) =/= (A=A))

*** Identity as a variable; the negation of the variable is the negation of identity, the presense of the variable is the presence of the identity.

(-A=-A) = ((A=/=A)=(A=/=A))

***The absence of identity is equivalent to the absence of identity, absence of identity is a relative identity.

((-A=-A)=(-A=-A)) = (A=A)

***The absence of identity is an identity at a higher order, identity is identity.

(A=-A) = ((A=A)=(-A=-A))

***Identity and absence of identity are both identities at a higher order thus are equivalent in this context of higher order.

((A=A) ↔ (A=/=A) ↔

(-A=/=-A) ↔ (A=-A)) = (A ↔ -A)

****Equality and inequality are conditional on eachother by degree of necessary contrast that allows each to be distinct.

(=) ↔ (=/=)

***Equality and inequality are bi-conditional.

(<->) → (<->)

***Bicondtionality is a variable that transitions to further biconditionality.

(->) → (->)

****Transition transitions to further transitions.

(((->)->)->)

****Transition is self-embedding as the distinction itself.

( )

( )( )

(( )( ))( )

(( )( ))( )( )

***There is context, context exists relative to another context, this relation is a context, context is empty and yet generative to further context.

(A = ( )) = ((=),(=/=),(->),(<->),(>),(-)(…))

****A variable is a context, all operators are variables.

A

AA = (A,-A)

(AA)A = (-A,–A)

(AA)AA = (–A,—A)

***There is a variable, this variable self references so that is it self contained in one respect and self-contrasting to its own negation in another. The self-referencing of the variable is a new variable that follows the same nature.

=

== = (=,-=(=/=))

(==)= = (-=(=/=),–=(=))

=/=

=/==/= = (=/=,-=/=(=))

(=/==/=)=/= = (-=/=(=),–=/=(=))

->

->-> = (->, - ->(<->))

(->->)-> = (- ->(<->),-- → (->))

<-><-> = (<->, - <->(->))

(<-><->)<-> = (- ↔ (->), – <->(->)

>

>> = (>, -)

(>>)> (- >(-), --(>))

-

-- = (-, >)

(–)- = (-- (>), - > (-))

… … = (… , -… ( ))

(… …) … = (-…(( )), --…(…))

A

AA

(AA)A

(AA)AA

(AA)(AA)A

((AA)(AA)…A) = B

B

BB

(BB)B

(BB)BB

((BB)(BB)…B) = C

C

CC

(CC)C

****Each self-reference of a variable is a new variable as a sequence. An infinite sequence is a variable as a process.

1 Like