Dualism Results in Gradation; Unity as Foundational; The Necessity of Being From Nothing

Philosophy Forums Philosophy
1

Dualism Results in Gradation; Unity as Foundational; The Necessity of Being From Nothing

I. Dualism as Gradation

  1. There is a dualism of Distinct and Indistinct:

DI

  1. The dualism of distinct and indistinct is distinct:

(DI)D

  1. The dualism of distinct and indistinct is indistinct:

(DI)I

  1. The dualism of distinct and indistinct is subject to the dualism of it being distinct and indistinct.

(DI)DI

  1. The dualism of dualisms is distinct:

((DI)DI)D

  1. The dualism of dualisms is indistinct:

((DI)DI)I

  1. The dualism of dualisms is subject to being a dualism:

((DI)DI)DI

  1. … The process continues indefinitely…

however each dualistic state is an expression of the first dualistic state at a different scale. The primary dualism exists as a fixed point, it exists across scale thus there is a relatively stable identity no matter how progressively complex the scale becomes.

However the scales change as the progression occurs thus each expression of the dualism appears differently thus resulting in a form of gradation as the multiple scales itself. In other terms each scale becomes a fixed point:

example (● will represent the binary DI presented earlier as a geometric visual):

There is the scale: ●●●●●●●●

● exists across the complete scale.

●● also exists across the complete scale.

●●●● also exists across the complete scale.

So as the scale progresses, not only are there fixed points which are stable, but the number of fixed points (scales that repeat within scales) multiplies thus resulting in the maintainance of the binary while simultaneously different scales as grades of it occurs.

So dualism results in gradation and neither contradict eachother.

II Unity Resulting in Multiplicity; Void as the Emergence of Being

  1. There is only a complete unity, this unity is indistinct as there is no contrast for it to be distinct thus the complete unity is void: ○

  2. The unity as void is the potential for it to be distinct as void thus becomes distinct by degree of self-contained self-contrast: ○○

In other words the indistinct void repeats self-referentially as its own distinction, otherwise there is no indistinct state, no void. Indistinction, void, is but potentiality. So what you see can be argued as “recursive potentiality” or “recursive void”.

The distinction is the recursion; ○○

as ○ is indistinct as there is no contrast for it to be distinct;

the recursion is the self-contrast but given the self contrast is contained by the recursion there is simultaneously self-containment as the recursion itself.

In shorter terms the distinction of potentiality is the distinction of actuality by the actuality of the potentiality being distinct as potentiality.

  1. This self contained self-contrast is a dualism as the distinction of the indistinct state is the indistinct indistinct from being indistinct; ie the negative is negated as negative, or the void is void of void: ○○

The dualism is the distinction of the indistinct which leaves itself as “distinction/indistinction” or “actuality/potentiality” or “being/void”

  1. The dualism is the first instance of scale by recursion/cycles.

  2. Process continues indefinitely thus resulting in distinction saturation as void.

  3. Void is all distinctions occuring at once thus the void is potential distinction.

  4. The potentiality self-scales otherwise it ceases to be potential, but the cessation of the potential is the actual thus the self-scaling, by recursion/cycles, is the potential as distinct thus the void is pure potential; pure potential is potentiality as actuality.

  5. The distinct and indistinct, actual and potential, being and void are but self-scaling distinctions, scale is syomymous to set or context.

  6. Pure Indistinction is all distinctions as indistinct; the indistinct is a distinction. Nothingness is a thing by means of the distinction of nothingness thus nothingness contains nothingness as the distinction of nothingness through self-contrasting self-containment.

  7. The totality of all distinctions is no distinction as there is no distinction for distinction to be distinct but the recursion of indistinction unto distinction is the recursion as distinct thus indistinction contains all distinctions by its self-reference in scale with all scales being the indistinct state;

The Totality, as the unity of all things as everything, is the same as nothing for there is no contrast to The Totality without it ceasing to be the totality for if something where beyond The Totality it would not be The Totality;

Infinite Beyonds is the containment of Everything as One by degree of the distinction of the boundary of Beyond containing everything as itself, this is given that the transcendence of a boundary is the establishment of one thus transcendence is boundary recursion.

The nature of indistinction is as follows:

  1. Indistinction is distinct from distinction thus is the embedding of distinction in scale; the absence of distinction is a distinction of absence thus a recursive scale occurs.

  2. Pure indistinction is pure distinction as pure indistinction is all possible distinctions uncollapsed unto a distinction.

So is indistinction free from distinction? Here is the answer visually:

There are infinite spheres within, without and between spheres. There appears nothing, but the sphere remains.

  1. Void must recurse as pure void must void void if it is pure void as from void comes void as there is only void, what we understand as “things” is recursive void synonymous to scaling of it.

In other words, synonymous ones: Pure potentiality contains the potentiality of potentiality as actuality

There is a single 0d point.

It cannot be seen as there is nothing, there is a blankness as there is no contrast.

Now if that 0d point repeats, there is a line, or a form of n-dimensions depending upon the degree of the recursion of the point.

This can be visualized with a basic line or n-dimensional shape.

This gradation is not from dualism alone, but does occur through dualism

Gradation can occur through any n-value logic. As argued above gradation can come from a monadic logic. Dualism is not necessary for gradation but its emergence is necessary thus in that context certain gradation, under the context of a binary, is necessary by a binary.

2
  1. Is “indistinct” truly free of distinction?
  2. Why must void recurse?
  3. Gradation from dualism alone?
3
  1. Indistinction is distinct from distinction thus is the embedding of distinction in scale; the absence of distinction is a distinction of absence thus a recursive scale occurs.

Pure indistinction is pure distinction as pure indistinction is all possible distinctions uncollapsed unto a distinction.

So is indistinction free from distinction? Here is the answer visually:

There are infinite spheres within, without and between spheres. There appears nothing, but the sphere remains.

  1. Void must recurse as pure void must void void if it is pure void as from void comes void as there is only void, what we understand as “things” is recursive void synonymous to scaling of it.

In other words, synonymous ones: Pure potentiality contains the potentiality of potentiality as actuality

Think of a single 0d point.

You cannot as there is nothing, there is a blankness.

Now if that 0d point repeats, you have a line, a form of n-dimensions depending upon the degree of the recursion of the point.

This argument can be visualized with a basic line or n-dimensional shape.

  1. Gradation from dualism alone? No. Dualism? Yes. Dualism only? No.

Gradation can occur through any n-value logic. As argued above gradation can come from a monadic logic. Dualism is not necessary for gradation but its emergence is necessary thus in that context certain gradation, under the context of a binary, is necessary by a binary.