Sober as a judge, are we now?
Sober? Maybe, feeling nauseous cause pushing to take sides, anthropomorphically, as if taking some part deceptively is ok, is not, reduces anyone to tears or laughter. No specs included, however.
Like the club of Rome, some can go to the masquerade and some don’t have to. They can stay still, stand their ground, at least for a while until the next tickler props up, who knows , the lonely, some a premium would pay, but not for sale, tell it to Faust’s buyer, he sore can’t learn from history how good his senses are.
Next up, the joy of masochistic alienation for beginners, or how to have fun an live trough spiderwoman’s kiss of venom.
()
I didn’t know, you were,
that is, was
Or will ever be
Joking
I’m sorry, sir, is your name HumAnize?
I’m seeing this with my mom Monday.
I was joking, anyway.
The joke , errrrrrrr
Well any house, or any wine house, , gotta relate my jungiannstage. It goes like this:
Birders are extremely important , getting through doors, keys to the castle begotten, not made or duplicated so as to get through the slide door or even through the rear, but kimsi komsa, not with standing,
So she says it wasn’t shur lee, it was someone like Salome minus the dance served up on a platter but that parusky dame , not sweat Lana ,(turner) turning.
The wheel of fortune or, of the dharma, wrote Gary Snyder about it one time, and still,
held to it. So she says paruskaya, that is, that the general says that society on a worldly stage is beginning to feel like boundaries need to be reaffirmed, and that your peculiar, particular uniqueness points to some nexus of a very profound kind and that it really is a case not of one=an other, but one delineated by a mystical approach, coming to be based on a precise formulae, that has been re vised, revisited, by a mystic law.
That absurdly far flung paradox of allusions definitely is an imago, like a hint of light reflected from the tarred surface traveling through the tunnel with the hoped for Lucy’s to found at the end, like a scent of lost wages, at the end of a yellow brick road, with the twinkling eye of the wizard, say around the time that the Great Depression needed a lift for those for the bells toll, and to Damian the wails of thunderous wraith, over sour grapes.
So the connection is tenuously lost in a haystack of allusions.
That is what such lostness is lost, whereby as Kerouac accepts it forever.
How to stop this MAD ness , without due resource of which’s source ery that Nichiren can only slide to , when he says she says, of the one who left everything behind but the two primal fixtures of reference that absolutely holds on to the moorings which tie his little ship of fools into a secure hold pattern
So as to transport innumerable souls back and forth between their pleasure and its demise?
This is the messenger’s job, Saint John the Devine comes to mind, , Patmos, the author of revelation? , but more the one who baptized Him.John.
Is it a condition before the turn, or one which does not preclude it?
So weather it’s a political trick to void off Faustus’ ignorance , or some other melancholy thing to regain faith in the statistics of refrigeration, or? ( thinking of eric Ericsson’s stage after passing the stage of trust,
Lots of keywords.
For the record, I was joking about the movie. Not the pact. But I still haven’t seen him, so. It is no pact yet.
The keys were lost in the castle, guarded by dragonfoophumpdogs, and therefore the film is no joke.
He, can not be seen because he is still alive and messaging.
To see him is not to trust him.
I guess the best way to see him is through De Anima. ?!?
To see her is when Sivanah drops the seventh
Veil.
)()(
The goddess Shivana has Buddhist connections 1 2 3
• In Buddhist mythology,
Mahesvara, a deva, is associated with spiritual knowledge
• Additionally, the term "Sages of
Sivana" is used in the book “The Monk Who Sold His Ferrari” to refer to highly enlightened individuals 4
See
()()
Go Fish!
52 cards scatter everywhere like rain
And putting all cards on the table is pretty sure needs very little bluff…
Hmm…
So…
When I got the old job back.
I don’t possess people which requires ‘divine intervention’
People are shocked how better life works without it.
Every once in a while I’ll have to work a case in a different galaxy.
Sometimes that means they come to earth.
Sorry about that.
They’re not trying to hurt us…
They just have horrible karma.
At least try to give everybody a heads up, man.
Don’t get me wrong , all it would take then is a flip of the coin
Whhhhhhaaaaat?
I knew you’d say just that
Heads I win, tails I win.
Yes maybe if the tail is merely two sided, not so the tale.
And it’s odd that the end result shows a statistical reversion not exactly 50/50
)( )(
Or
2 MIN READ
Scientists Destroy Illusion That Coin Toss Flips Are 50–50
Researchers go to great lengths to prove a tiny bias in coin flipping
BY SHI EN KIM
Thomas Fuchs
January 2024 Issue
Statistics
The phrase “coin toss” is a classic synonym for randomness. But since at least the 18th century, mathematicianshave suspected that even fair coins tend to land on one side slightly more often than the other. Proving this tiny bias, however, would require hundreds of thousands of meticulously recorded coin flips, making laboratory tests a logistical nightmare.
František Bartoš, currently a Ph.D. candidate studying the research methods of psychology at the University of Amsterdam, became intrigued by this challenge four years ago. He couldn’t round up enough volunteers to investigate it at first. “Nobody was stupid enough to spend a couple of weekends flipping coins,” he says. But after he began his Ph.D. studies, he tried again, recruiting 47 volunteers (many of them friends and fellow students) from six countries. Multiple weekends of coin flipping later, including one 12-hour marathon session, the team had performed 350,757 tosses, shattering the previous record of 40,000.
The flipped coins, according to findings in a preprint study posted on arXiv.org, landed with the same side facing upward as before the toss 50.8 percent of the time. The large number of throws allows statisticians to conclude that the nearly 1 percent bias isn’t a fluke. “We can be quite sure there is a bias in coin flips after this data set,” Bartoš says.
The leading theory explaining the subtle advantage comes from a 2007 physics study by Stanford University statistician Persi Diaconis and his colleagues, whose calculations predicted a same-side bias of 51 percent. From the moment a coin is launched into the air, its entire trajectory—including whether it lands on heads or tails—can be calculated by the laws of mechanics. The researchers determined that airborne coins don’t turn around their symmetrical axis; instead they tend to wobble off-center, which causes them to spend a little more time aloft with their initial “up” side on top.
For day-to-day decisions, coin tosses are as good as random because a 1 percent bias isn’t perceptible with just a few coin flips, says statistician Amelia McNamara of the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota, who wasn’t involved in the new research. Still, the study’s conclusions should dispel any lingering doubt regarding the coin flip’s slender bias. “This is great empirical evidence backing that up,” she says.
It isn’t difficult to prevent this bias from influencing your coin-toss matches; simply concealing the coin’s starting position before flipping it should do the trick. Alternatively, you can do away with flipping altogether by jiggling a coin between your curved palms. But if your friends are unaware of the tiny bias, you may as well benefit from your slight advantage. After all, 51 percent odds beat a casino’s house advantage for six-deck blackjack. “If you asked me to bet on a coin,” Bartoš says, “why wouldn’t I give myself a 1 percent bias?”
It may be possibly a random demonstrated psychic bias, just as well.
Otherwise much to do about nothing
…
If I may have said something offensive I apologize,I don’t know
Otherwise pet it fall where it may
Ecmandu is the new dog
On the nature of the Ecmandu see Capitalism and Schizophrenia by your homeboys G and D. It will serve as a comprehensive guide to understanding why there are Ecmandus and what causes them in the modern world.
If you read it let me know how it goes because i never read it.
1 Like
Yes I have both of those books, even read a decent about of both.
They’re good in the sense of expanding the way you handle concepts and expanding meaning phenomenologically, internal to and across conceptual relations. Also good for expanding your vocabulary and generally outside the box creative thinking. But in terms of real substance and meaningful, philosophical content… meh. I mean it’s there, but not exactly on every page.
Something like Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man or Kitaro’s Nothingness and the Religious Worldview have more true substance and meaningful content. But I get it, D&G are famous and not without good reason. I always felt like the writings they did on their own were more powerful than their combined efforts, honestly. Difference and Repetition is quite powerful, and I remember reading some political-economic essays by Guattari that were powerful too.