This takes me back to 2011 and 2014 but both are “unfinished”…
…because … even though I had be/do/end(1) (requiring each distinctly, without letting one stand in for the other), I still conflated doing/existantiating the good (the moral law) with value (essence, meaning) in general… because I didn’t fully have the Venn of Import (will eventually articulate, I’m sure, that is, Lord-willing). And we have seen that Leibniz also grasped its relevance to the character of Nature (position/conception, action/perception, force/judgment).
… but mostly because if this is ever “finished” at all… it will take (or, takes) an act of God (hopefully not a human-caused/-preventable natural, globally warming disaster).
Footnote:
(1) I gleaned be/do/end from “The Moral of the story” by Nina Rosenstand, who brought the golden rule up in comparison to all major theories in ethics, and highlighted character/virtue (part 2, ch 6, part 3), conduct (part 2, ch 6, 7, part 3, ch 12), and consequences/teleology (part 2, chs 4, 5, 7 & part 3).