Everything and Nothing is a Distinction; Pre/Post Primitive Nature of Distinction; Scaling of Distinction; Scale as Distinction; Non-Dual Multivalency as Occurence
The unity of all things, and non-things, by degree of distinction of said things, and non-things, as the transcendental event from which both thing and non-thing occurs reveals a non-dual multivalency to the event of distinction itself as both thing and non-thing are distinctions within the event of distinction and these distinctions within the event of distinction are distinction(s).
To doubt distinction is to observe the distinction of doubt;
To assume distinction is to observe the distinction of assume;
To assert distinction is to observe the distinction of assert;
To make distinct distinction to the observe the distinction of distinct.
All distinction is dependent upon further distinction by which distinction contains itself by its own limits as distinction, thus to argue a primitive beyond distinction, x, is to observe the distinction of it, x. Thus by degree distinction is reflexive, and all that is derived from distinction, including the distinction "derived from distinction, is reflexive by degree.
The self-containment of distinction by distinction requires simultaneous distinction exterior to distinction, thus what remains is the event of distinction as scaling of itself as containment and exterior relations are but expression of relative states.
What remains is distinction as pre-primitive and post-primitive as pre/post-primitives are distinctions.
“Everything” and “Nothing” are distinctions thus distinction is pre/post primitive derivations of “Everything” and “Nothing”.
What remains is the event of distinction, a distinction, as occurence that is inherently non-dual multivalent.
Thus by degree of things and non-things are recursive by nature of recursive events of distinction;
Cognition and non-cognition are events that emerge from distinction as distinctions;
True and False are events that emerge from distinction as distinction;
The emergence and dissolution of distinction is the distinctions of emergence and dissolution.
The distinction of distinction is indistinction as indistinction is distinct from distinction thus is a distinction;
the indistinction of indistinction is the distinction of indistinction from indistinction thus indistinction is a distinction.
To reduce reality and non-reality to a primitive is a self-negation of the primitive as the primitive is subject to distinction and the distinction of the primitive from non-primitive nullifies the primitive as being primitive from its emergence as distinction.
The question of foundations derived from this are negated as foundation is subject to the event of distinction thus is no-longer a foundation while the nature of distinction being foundational is prior to the nature of distinction being foundational as “the nature of distinction being foundational” is subject to the distinctions of “nature”, “distinction”, “foundational”.
What remains is distinction, “remains” is subject to the event of distinction.