You believe that you are a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) you psychotic loser….lol…so who are you to give mental health advice to anyone?
How can I be a misrepresentation of reality when I am a binary non-existence that is not able to say it does not exist?
Just being honest here, but this is not an example of good philosophizing.
Take it or leave it.
Maybe Taylor will validate your amazing philosophical skills! Edit: She probably has some hot single friends she could hook you up with too 
What does it matter?…you exist because you claim things ….you can’t claim anything without first existing…..so if you claim that you don’t exist you are merely a liar that exists.
So you exist….but you don’t posses life ProfessorX because you have no idea what life is and neither does a binary processing biological machine.
I possess life but not existence
You possess nothing ProfessorX because you’re deluded.You are a dead representation of reality (a non illusion) that exists.
1 Like
Hey man that’s not nice, take it back.
It isn’t nice which why I am warning you that you are in no position to advise anyone about anything at all…you are in a desperate state.
It not nice…I agree …but it’s the truth.
1 Like
Is this you?
You have listened to a lie ProfessorX …is it any wonder that you have ended up in a desperate psychotic state?…you only have yourself to blame.Mainstream religious crank/crack pot pseudoscientists are lost and they have dragged you along with them.
1 Like
Yeah, the devil leaves his own alone until he doesn’t.
1 Like
Bro stop being a binary non-machine that doesn’t even exist. It’s embarrassing to those of us machines with life.
You don’t possess life ProfessorX…it’s an alien concept to you.You only exist because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist…you need to exist to claim anything at all…so you have never been able to cancel yourself out so your philosophy is false.Its proven.
What a non-existent living binary machine looks like:
Your cat exists because it processes binary data ProfessorX just like you.
1 Like
Fair observation.
You provide no actual counter argument. No rebuttal whatsoever. Not even an attempt. You simply reject the statements and arguments presented. That isn’t good philosophy.
As expressed, the goal is to produce a functional, foundational ontology accessible to anyone. The intuitive, practical terms ensure accessibility and the details expressed above illustrate its functionality.
1 Like
Your drive-thru diagnosis may have merit if I had merely pulled these claims out of thin air. But I didn’t.
In 2014 a community member was killed by law enforcement:
“Officers shot and killed a burglary suspect inside her Harriman home Tuesday afternoon, according to the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation. The incident stemmed from a burglary call at a storage unit earlier that day. Officers said Miranda Michelle Guy, 28, was spotted driving a suspicious car and fled from officers. She then drove to her home, ran inside, grabbed a gun, and pointed it at officers, according to authorities. That is when officers said they shot Guy.”
She was followed, without due process, chased into her home and killed.
Subsequent events led to my 2015 arrest. While driving one day I presented the middle finger to a law enforcement officer (same locality) and was pulled over and accosted. The initial accusation was speeding however I was arrested for disorderly conduct which was largely prompted by said events of 2014.
When arrested I was in possession of a flash drive containing numerous essays I had written concerning government, commercialism, capitalism, socialism, society, philosophy, etcetera. It also contained personal poetry and fictional short stories including tales about extraterrestrials. Much of the material was inspired by the 2014 events. This would have been evident.
When communicating with authorities I expressed that I wanted them to examine the flash drive and its contents. That was part of the plan, to communicate these ideas in a provocative way hopefully to incite change or discussion. In fact that very message was conveyed in the material. It worked.
Those events, including my efforts in response, happened to coincide with the massive wave of police brutality in America at the time. Those efforts led to pop media references:
2017: Snoop Dogg “Lavender (Nightfall remix)”
“Listen To A Snippet Of A New Snoop Dogg Song Which Samples Kaytranada And BADBADNOTGOOD’s “Lavender””
“Snoop seems to address recent killings by police officers on the upcoming track.”
https://www.thefader.com/2016/10/19/snoop-dogg-kaytranada-badbadnotgood-snippet
.
In 2022 I began sharing my philosophical and political material on the Philosophy Now forums:
The Rich And The Poor (2022)
Abortion Discussion (2022)
.
…which inspired Taylor’s 2023 music video:
.
I produced a brief YouTube video explaining the details:
.
By 2024 Taylor was doing philosophy and was even featured in Philosophy Now magazine, the same forum where I began posting in 2022:
Taylor Swift: A Philosopher For Our Times Issue 164
https://philosophynow.org/issues/164/Taylor_Swift_A_Philosopher_For_Our_Times
There was no association of Taylor Swift with philosophy before this. I got Taylor into philosophy. Hence “Lavender Haze” and her Philosophy Now feature.
Your claim may have merit if I had no evidence. There it is.
We are trying to bring interest back to philosophy. We are trying to bring attention to intellectual pursuits and achievements.
1 Like
My question is: why do you think it’s so important to popularize Parmenides?
Is there a rationale or just a kind of vague “power to the people” or “I need to express myself” type endeavour?
I’m not attempting to popularize Parmenides.
I developed this material independently. I simply reference Parmenides to position this work on the philosophical map while simultaneously paying homage to his work, considering the material presented is similar. It also represents progression of thought.
I seek to create. I seek to contribute. I’m developing a foundational ontology. Existence is fascinating to me. This work is fascinating to me.
I seek to make it accessible to all, not just academics. Perhaps in that sense “power to the people”.