Yeah ok but my question was more why.
If there is one. If not, I’ll consider it answered.
Because I’m a capable being endowed with the ability of creativity.
I’m more than a consumer. I’m more than a burrowing animal. I’m a capable, thoughtful, creative intellect expressed through these endeavors.
And because philosophy needs a revival.
Hm. I still wouldn’t be able to discern a rationale in that.
I’ll write it down as vague “power to the people” or “need to express myself” type endeavour.
Sorry for the rush.
You must be the burrowing type.
Well ok from what I understood, you consider that:
- You are capable of being endowed with the ability of creativity;
- You are more than a consumer;
- You are more than a burrowing animal;
- You are a capable, thoughtful, creative intellect expressed through the endeavour (of popularizing Parmenides, or you can word it different if you want);
- Philosophy needs a revival;
And that, as a consequence, you have embarked on popularizing Parmenides, or you can also word it differently if you want.
But there is no rationale there, you didn’t really establish how any of the things you consider connect to the thing you embarked on. You did reaffirm the vague “power to the people” idea and also vaguely reaffirmed, here,
my notion of a vague idea of “I need to express myself.”
So that’s why I am sort of considering it answered. But maybe you feel that is an incomplete assessment.
Do you think I read any of that? 
I am endowed with the ability of creativity. You are not. That’s why you’re doing that, whatever that is.
That’s why I, Taylor, Parmenides and others create. That’s why millions observe our names. People like you just talk.
Again, I am not seeking to popularize Parmenides. The material presented is similar to Parmenides’ work and it also concerns ontology. However there are major differences.
For example Parmenides did not include explicit, operational terms or definitions with his philosophy. His philosophy is trapped in abstraction. His framework provides no bridge between the abstract and the concrete, no means of substantiation. His work is rather poetic.
Additionally Parmenides’ system is relatively rigid and dogmatic. It doesn’t allow room for theological freedom. Parmenides’ framework does not accommodate various views of deism, theism, pantheism, atheism, etcetera.
The ontology I’m presenting offers explicit, operational terms and definitions. It allows theological freedom as it is expansive and fundamental enough to accommodate various worldviews. It also seamlessly integrates science and the scientific method.
As expressed, the goal is to produce a functional, foundational ontology accessible to anyone. The intuitive, practical terms ensure accessibility and the details conveyed here illustrate its functionality.
No, I didn’t necessarily think you would recognize it.
But one throws the dice.
Hey, anonymous loser, quit cluttering the thread.
Again, I am not seeking to popularize Parmenides. The material presented is similar to Parmenides’ work and it also concerns ontology. However there are major differences.
For example Parmenides did not include explicit, operational terms or definitions with his philosophy. His philosophy is trapped in abstraction. His framework provides no bridge between the abstract and the concrete, no means of substantiation. His work is rather poetic.
Parmenides essentially dismissed change as illusion.
Additionally Parmenides’ system is relatively rigid and dogmatic. It doesn’t allow room for theological freedom. Parmenides’ framework does not accommodate various views of deism, theism, pantheism, atheism, etcetera.
The ontology I’m presenting offers explicit, operational terms and definitions. It accommodates change while also maintaining the constancy of existence. It allows theological freedom as it is expansive and fundamental enough to accommodate various worldviews. It also seamlessly integrates science and the scientific method.
As expressed, the goal is to produce a functional, foundational ontology accessible to anyone. The intuitive, practical terms ensure accessibility and the details conveyed here illustrate its functionality.