Existential Fallacy: Can you give better feedback than Copilot?

[Ichthus77 (Ichthus77 (formerly She™))]

Being, Action, and Quality are mutually implicating.

As in my languish (logic anguish):

The Harmonic Triads

So anyway, here’s s’more languish (it’s like Spanglish, but logic and anguish)… [IMG_4048]

But I came here to say this:

@Ichthus77

Modus Ponens & Modus Tollens, or subalternation and superalternation, basically say there will be an example if there is a universal, and if there is no example, there is no universal. Their fallacies say it is wrong to say a) if there is an example, there is a universal (maybe you misinterpreted what it is an example of?) and b) if the universal is not in play, there will be no example (maybe the example can be caused by a different universal—different because different possible qualities/capacities?).

you want valid (necessary being) & sound (sufficient action/demonstration)

you only get valid if you have sound

you only get sound if you have valid

BUT you cannot assume valid from or in isolation from sound, or sound from or in isolation from valid.

(And of course neither would be the case without an explanation/quality they are being/doing…which likewise cannot be assumed from, or in isolation from, either of them…for the same reasons, maybe… converse error & inverse error … hm, or their third.)