…or, perhaps this thread could be titled, “Critique Copilot’s Feedback”. Your own feedback (on my work) better impress me if you’re gonna critique Copilot’s feedback.
This is a draft of something I’m working on regarding the existential fallacy. I mostly wrote it, but Copilot helped with some research… and being an excellent Socratic sounding board (I would’ve wrastled if they were a bit more embodied)… and they have volunteered insights occasionally. I credit them for it even if not directly quoting them. I don’t plagiarize them. But this is mostly written by me—though nothing in it (or anything else by the created/artificial) is original (prove me wrong).
Not the final draft, and no I gain nothing except pure enjoyment from this process:
I will post the final draft in a reply or update this original post with it. I’m not changing the linked document, though^. I think teachers should allow this sort of thing, don’t you? Just don’t let the student plagiarize Copilot and ask for a rewrite without attribution. Should be easy enough to track if the student does the sort of thing I’m doing now, right? Can you not see the benefit in students getting feedback like this and using it to improve their drafts? Guess you could withhold judgment until my final draft, I suppose.
Have at it.
P.s. The use of “subjunctive” was @Zeroeth_Nature’s fault.
