Triadic First Principle(s)

[Ichthus77 (Ichthus77 (formerly She™))]

@Zeroeth_Nature

A first principle is not:

• an axiom

…how is that parroting me?

@Zeroeth_Nature

Since an axiom has no conclusion by itself, and therefore can neither be valid nor invalid by itself, it is not the same as a premise-less necessity etc.

Are you agreeing that the triadic first principle(s) has/have no conclusion ALONE… they need each other in order to all … be?

@Zeroeth_Nature

“they” drew the logically necessary conclusion that a first principle was not an axiom—making it a valid argument, but not a sound one!

Stay with me here, man. This may be the most relevant thing you’ve said so far. PLEASE REVIEW. Relevant thread: Existential Fallacy: Can you give better feedback than Copilot?