Existential individualism_III; that which makes ‘x’ is in origins itself also an ‘x’.
when one dies the ‘force’ which pushes the mind into singular perspective, is relinquished. In worldly terms, causality manifests the form with respect to its original affecting aspect [informations prior to there existing informations]. You begin with ‘x’ – here the given personhood/individual, then the means [the cosmic blender = inverse thereof [creation/manifestation] ‘y’ then the result ‘z’.
‘z’ tries to become ‘x’, but information conflates and the means becomes the obstacle. Equally the means ‘y’ is a long chain of x,y,z,'s, so it is trying to achieve ‘x’ continuously. Naturally there will manifest a duality whereby the set [here the given individual] is attempting to become the set of X, but Y knows no ‘x’ because it is Y.
I don’t think X is a kind of background information as the BI theory is concerned with existent info background in the universe. Clearly there is a kind of information which is the universal medium e.g. between physical info and the category of info in how we think, or computer code and what have you.
Simply put, all things are talking to each other and that will manifest a universal medium. Then the language of that ~ after we have put it through the cosmic blender [consider the impossible variety in QM and relativity etc], is not physical information.
Metaphysics of afterlife and rebirth
we began by talking about the ‘force’ denoting singular perspective and now we will imagine what that is in real terms; firstly I am not going to add in any intermediaries [Gods and what have you]. As I see it, z is trying to become x, the potential and original ‘information’ [the universal kind, and not physical] = ‘x’ for the given ‘z’. the cosmic blender contains everything, and so it contains the thing which becomes the thing [z] ~ the unmanifest and the manifest variant.
There is also Y as the cosmic means to everything happening. Literally that universal ‘information’ becomes existent information.
Y occurs and not x-to-x in a 1:1 fashion, because information conflates - because it IS information, ergo will inform. Whereas universal information has already done its informing in originally manifesting an existent info. So it moves in steps; you get the UI [uni-info] which becomes info, which then also informs but can only do that within its own circle ~ to other informations.
What does it all mean? That we [‘x’] make ourselves existent, and equally that Y is also doing that as it is the means [could be at root God and then the Tao as divinity finds its way].
- doesn’t mean we are all going to arrive at or find our x in the z though. So I believe in compassion where e.g. ones causality may be in the way, as opposed to there necessarily being a weakness of individual spirit. We don’t get to pick the means and cannot always forge our own paths. We are all however equal individuals, we have all become by the force of our own existence and equally by the passive will of the gods/God. Passive because Y in X [divinity and individuality] knows all x’s, and that all info that can become manifest will do so.
_
