PoR:
You must understand that the causes and conditions pertaining to WW2 is not some great evidence that the Nazi ideals are necessarily correct, or ‘right.’ The war was inspired through a reaction to the Versailles treaty and its terms, and in that sense it was a reactionary war, a resistence more so than a war of repression. That is why it was so beautiful and controversial. If you have a scattered people who can be led to believe that their very nationality is at stake, it can be through the propaganda of eugenics that the reaction and patriotism is inspired, when the appropriate reaction should be only political and not racial.
Racial purity is great, PoR, but it is not an inherent or teleological program for evolution. If it were, inter-racial breeding would not be possible biologically. To maintain that racial purity is better is a matter of ideology and not science.
What was really a cultural war was glossed over by the Nazis as being a genetic war, and they were led to believe through propaganda that not only were world politics destined to become a disaster, but also that certain races were at fault. This is partially true, but it is certainly not an issue of race. It is an issue of political sciences- where cultures and traditions are created.
Anti-socialism as espoused by the democratic allies was, I believe, to Hitler, the embryonic stage of capitalism by-way-of religion. He felt it his task to try and stop it- yet he also has his own ‘religious’ ideals which he secretly entertained himself. I might add that they are as far-fetched as the fundamentals of Judaism and Christianity, the religions he opposed.
This is what makes it so difficult to fully sign oneself over to the ‘Nazi Ideal.’ One wants to pick out a few principles here and there, but stands in outrage at many others. It is very important, PoR, to recognize the difference between the obvious controversial matters of racism, and the easily accepted matters pertaining to political science.
Should white people be breeding with black people? Well, thats one way it can happen here on earth, but the other way could work as well. However, both are contingent and improvisational. Nobody has a fucking clue what the future holds or if there are any ‘purposes’ which we are evolving to achieve.
When you say that inter-racial breeding is a bad thing you are simultaneously presenting a larger set of ideals and philosophies which originate in language and metaphor moreso than in empirical proofs. Sure, if John Boy fucks his sister, chances are the kid will be deformed. That’s an empirical proof. But when Tawanda reproduces with Brad, we get a generally healthy offspring whom is not noticably degenerate. I fail to see how ‘evolution’ has made a mistake in inter-racial breeding.
You know what you are doing, PoR? You are fighting the good fight for the wrong reasons…just like Hitler, but he purposely did it- the propaganda was tactical, you, on the other hand, are accidentally promoting good politics through irrelevent means- racial purity.
Look, it is okay to hate. I do it all the time. But I do not resent. If I find a person, black, blue, or purple, I do not anger at their race but rather their mentality- a culturally bound production. I look at “La Tron Jackson,” the resident wanna-be gangsta who wouldn’t have the balls to kick an attacking poodle, but parades around as if he were a ‘made-man,’ hardened on the streets of Brooklyn, and I say to myself: "This guy is pathetic. But its not his fault. I don’t resent him, I resent his effects, his inauthenticity, his hipocrisy. The extinction of the type is what is sought after, but not the extinction of individuality itself. To achieve this one attacks the culture, the soil from which the mutant grows, the capitalism in our case. La Tron is not, ironically, expressing originality or individuality. He is a class type that is generated in consumerist discourse, and rather than achieving self-expression he is alienating other classes from himself as well as a false elevation of his own.
La Tron, as an individual, is a beautiful human being. As a personage he is like a disease.
Know where to aim your guns, PoR. Say nothing more to La Tron than “you know not what you do,” and walk way. Don’t even begin to try to explain to this idot what he is. Instead, your gift to him is the efforts you make toward his extinction. This is done in the long term ramifications of social science, not in a gas chamber or oven.
