Fascism has infected the minds of young men and women. Please provide evidence that it has not.
All praise our glorious benevolent overlords!
Define fasci-ism.
Fasci is an Italian word meaning “bundle of rods”. It symbolized power for Romans.
Golden Dawn barbarians are often described as fascistic, but they themselves insist they are not, for fascism is an Italian/Roman invention whereas they are Greek.
So what is fascism, Trixie?
K: you cannot prove a negative. For example, you can say, there is something but you cannot
say, there is not something, prove it. How do you prove that something doesn’t exist? for example,
unicorns exist, prove it. Now unicorns don’t exist, so how do you prove they exist?
Kropotkin
I can prove that there are no unicorns in my house.
We need new words. Existing words are not only inadequate, they are also deceptive.
What is meant by fascism?
Monarchy?
Nationalism?
Even these terms are poorly defined . . .
Here let me help.
Fascism- Centralised corporate bureaucracy
K: how do you “prove” that there are no unicorns?
Kropotkin
Through observation. I can check every single room and take a note whether I can see any unicorns or not. That’s how I would prove it to myself. If you want me to prove it to you and others, I can take photos and send them to you. What do you think?
The problem is not a negative, but infinity. You cannot prove that “there is no God” because of the fact that the universe is infinite. You can check every corner of the world and show to the religious that not a single one has a God in it, but they can always claim that you haven’t checked EVERY SINGLE CORNER THERE IS and that there still is a chance that He might be somewhere BEYOND.
Very good magnus anderson. The theory is nonfalsifiable. The statement “unicorns exist” can never be proven false no matter how long and far you go looking for unicorns. The statement “unicorns do not exist”, however, can be disproven upon finding a single unicorn.
Popper would be proud of you son.
It’s simpler than that. Not a single one of my observations support the claim, hence, “unicorns exist” is not true.
Popper was a Jew who had a strange aversion towards induction.
Politics comes in two groups, those who want what is good for us [them], and those who want what is good for us [everyone].
Its just a stupid little planet, why be nationalistic when it doesn’t mean anything. Would ‘fascists’ not take a high paid job abroad, or fuck a hot foreigner? What do they do when she gets pregnant, disown and debase their own child? Bla bla. if hitler won, would there not be germans all over the world running things ~ their very complaint against the jews?
Here is what my friend George Orwell has to say on the meaning of the word “fascism”:
And he is correct! When people say “fascist”, and also “Nazi”, what they mean is “bully”. There really is nothing else to it.
In fact, left/right political dichotomy means nothing other than anti-bullying/pro-bullying.
Now, I am not sure to what extent fascists (i.e. Mussolini and his Italian comrades) were bullies, but if bullism is what Trixie means when she says fascism, then yes, she is right, bullism has infected the mind of young men and women, and it has been like that for ages.
What’s wrong with Germans running the world? Or anyone who is qualified to run it? The problem is that Jews are bullies, precisely that thing Hitler and his regime are accused of.
There’s nothing wrong with anyone ruling the world, as long as it isn’t one particular group/nation ~ and that includes the jews. There are also degrees of bullying, the jews running the banks, using racist employment to make more jews to work in banks and 'jew’ellery, gold etc, is not quite the same as the degree of bullying by the nazis. hmm unless one were a muslim, they might see it somewhat differently, but still not the same degree imho.
I would say: more generally, there is nothing wrong with anyone ruling the world so as long their rule has a respect for that which they rule over. It does not matter whether it is one group/nation ruling or not.
You are referring to the far-right version of Hitler, which I believe is a caricature that is far-from real Hitler, and I do agree that it is horrific, but is that the real Hitler, or is it a caricature of Hitler?
Personally, I don’t care much about history. What I care about is the idea on how one should govern a nation and what bothers me is the strong association between monarchy and tyranny and between democracy and freedom.
Fascism is a system of government that gives the state full control over the population.
Historian and journalist Joan Veon explains how fascism comes to fruition:
Through public-private partnerships, the balance of power shifts from the people to the partner who has the most money. As the power shifts to the deepest pockets (the corporation), we have then moved into fascism—rule by big (reinvented) government and big business.
Veon says that these two elements are key in introducing fascism:
(1) the downsizing of federal government in order to fit into the future global governance
(2) the government’s shift to privatization of public services through public-private partnerships.
Constance Cumbey, Lawyer wrote about the now deceased Joan Veon.
“She attended more than 100 conferences put on by the elites who rule the world and want to destroy ours. She traveled to many foreign countries to get the truth first hand. But, she did it because, like millions of us, we know the grand scheme underway to bring down our country and force us to be ruled by a one world government”.
Currently, my use of the word refers to groups which ban anyone who says something that they slightly don’t agree with.
Magnus Anderson
Don’t you think its inevitable that such a national minority rule would become elitist? Even if it didn’t need to be that to begin with ~ which is more than likely. The British empirists didn’t call themselves fascists and probably thought they made things better for people. So historically I would think that generally any ruling elite has been equivalent of fascists.
He was far right, though I do know about the letters he sent to britain and america asking them to take the jews ~ and they refused. To me that says his reaction was always going have the same ultimate outcome if victorious. I agree democracy is something of a term for our enslavement, but the alternatives haven’t worked out to well, and that is why I look to history. truly to have power there needs to be a number of competing factions, who thence don’t have total power.
A Shieldmaiden
I want control over me and my family, and not for anyone else to have FULL control over me. Because inevitably with top-down power, that is what occurs. People think they can gain strength from strong determined leaders, royalty and the like, but inevitably as history shows, whenever you get that you end up getting ass-raped by your enemies.
Amorphos wrote:
We live in a completely new and different reality than past events, big business and big government makes fascism and that is happening today.
Big industry is working with the government to suppress the common worker and control their movements.
People believe they are free, but they are not and have no say in it anyway. The working class, (one could call them the serfs of today), have no option but to make the rich….richer.