Gender reassignment in the West

Philosophy Forums Society, Government, and Economics
1

The definition of gender is becoming increasingly blurred in the western world. What is male and what is female from a social sense? People are more evolved animals, in the aminal kingdom, the male and female play their each unique and important role which is clearly defined by their biological make up.

In the traditional sense, the man as the father is the head of family, he fight to defend and protect his family, he brings home the bacon. The female as the mother looks after the children and prepares his meals.

Are traditional roles degrading for women? Do women look down on the importance of motherhood? In the animal kingdom, the female as the mother looks after the offspring, while the male goes out to hunt. Is hunting more respecetable than looking after children?

In the modern age, some women can earn a better income than men and some men can cook better meals than women. Do men need women and do women need men? Given all this freedom, nobody knows what their roles are in society so they take on both. The man takes on part of the women’s role and the women takes on part of the man’s role. As a result, everyone turns into self-contained individuals living an increasingly single life in a one bedroom apartment masterbating at night.

In previous generations, men and women have had certain, defined roles to play and each played their part abiding by social norms. The grandmothers and grandfathers never complained.

The western females (the ones I meet are in their 20s so maybe immature and childish and thinks they can have everything) are acting like males, no longer lady like, have no feminine characteristics apart from having a vagina.

If we are to respect men and women’s gender then we are being sexist. Should we address both sexist by MSR, i.e Ms + Mr. Men and women are different, to say the sexist is the same is gender communism, I believe in treating everyone with respect but to treat the sexes the same way is gender abuse.

In traditional way of life, women have more respect than they do now. There is for instance less pornography, men are gentleman like, women are ladies. The feminism movement is initiated by women with problems with men, who are deeply unhappy in their relationship with men and is bringing their unhappiness to other women. I believe their are more unhappy, lonely men and women than ever before. All thanks to gender communism.

2

Sex-roles are largely biological, males aren’t just maley because of society, even males raised as psychological and psyiologiocally as females, have acted like males to the point of saying “we feel like males trapped in female bodies”. This is consistant, no matter how much you try and force female roles on males in youth, for most typical male youth, they’re going to act pretty damn close to the same.

That being said when people get older the same is true, equal rights and equal oppertunities (as much as can be) doesn’t change female ‘sex’ roles in society (it does a lot, like males no longer legally beat females, but thats not what I mean, I mean in term of mothers, sisters, whatever).

3

I vote for the traditional family model.

4

There has always existed in every society a small amount of people who suffer from a crises of gender identity. In many cultures it is not a big deal and these people are allowed to take on whatever role they feel comfortable in. A fair solution.

In others it seems to be some sort of attack on the social structure and so these people are persecuted and abused and forced into hiding. This leads me to think that such a society is not based on the ideals of justice and fairness and egalitarianism but something else.

All in all, I think people would be more comfortable and better off over the long run with the former than the latter.

5

I have also discovered after working in an office for three years that the only thing women do is petty office politics, no one cares about the state of the company, for them, the whole thing is a game. They are bad decision makers, extremely indecisive, can’t take responsibility so they engage in mass politics, hiding behind one another avoiding personal responsibility.

6

I have wondered about this too; but I don’t have anything to contribute. I see something like male and female converging; resulting in persons. This would make sense against the background of the NWO, race does not exist, gender does not exist; the distinctness of cultures is reformated. But then I ask myself, why are some groups increasingly cut off from the mainstream rather than being integrated into the homogeneity? Children are removed from the world of work and the adult world. Why wouldn’t the adult-child line be blurred in the way that the male-female line is being? Who benefits? What is the underlying reason why male and female, or race or culture or political orientation are increasingly stripped of differentiating features? but this is not so for everyone. A principle of rationality? power to work and be taxed? What is the reason for the sorting; for writing zeros over everyone? something about making a homogenous mass of individuals with no distinction; no race, no gender, no history, no unique orientation of any kind (homosexuality wasn’t accepted, it’s uniqueness was diluted). Children and old people have a future, and also a past; (also a future and a past that will see them change ontologically); in this they are very different from the democratized mass.