No, it’s usually idiotic liberals that wants to censor and silence their critics or political opponents because they’re unable to argue their point other than going around shouting at everyone with the word FASCIST drooling from their mouths.
1 Like
‘Interesting’ that it’s the American conspiracy loons and woman haters, from ‘The land of the free’ (which apparently invented free speech and the entire condept of FREEDOM no less (sarcasm by the way. I do realise the poor things can’t compute anything that isn’t absolutely literal) ) are getting together to ‘flag’ comments en masse that they don’t like. Imagine insulting Nazis, conspiracy lie-spreaders, and incel woman-loathers. Tsk tsk. What’s the world coming to?
1 Like
I call people like you global social utopian death cult, because you want to destroy anybody you feel threatens your envisioning of global social utopia. Those that would kill and destroy others in the name of preserving their global social utopia.
Modern liberals of the world really are Trotskyists, if Joseph Stalin was alive today he would probably have a stroke seeing the transformation of modern liberalism.
I now feel like going on a global political campaign for Stalinism being the Stalinist that I am.
MrAuthoritarian:
No, it’s usually idiotic liberals that wants to censor and silence their critics or political opponents because they’re unable to argue their point other than going around shouting at everyone with the word FASCIST drooling from their mouths.
K: MR. A, please show us which liberal, name names, which liberal
in fact, said that about censorship and silencing their critics…
please give us the information, so we can look that up ourselves…
Kropotkin
1 Like
The modern Trotskyist political liberal hasn’t been for nonviolence for a very long time.
Ever since the summer of the George Floyd rioting it has been all about destroying all of the non-liberals.
I was in Portland, Oregon for traveling work assignment when I got to see the George Floyd rioting up close from a small distance. Fun stuff concerning violent mobs of people fighting the police in the streets.
What a confused soul you are. Stalin was famous for his love of free speech 
Here you are whining about restrictions on free speech, yet in pretty much every post you make you are moaning about people who are LIBERal. Poor Americans. They really can’t help it 
pssst. Those people you insist on calling LIBERALS actually refer to THEMSELVES as Marxists No wonder the world’s so fucked up–and we have good old illiterate amuricans to thank for it.
Oh, and there it is. More Jew-hating, anti-woman conspiracy bullshit. I wonder if it will get ‘flagged’ 
The funniest thing on this forum is that he calls himself a ‘buddhist’ 
1 Like
I am all for free speech as I think it is the best way to drown out bad actors and overall idiocy.
Even Jewish Zionist Karens like yourself.
Unless it is people that liberals disagree with in which modern liberals have tried everything they can do to purge non-liberals out of society completely.
MrAuthoritarian:
Unless it is people that liberals disagree with in which modern liberals have tried everything they can do to purge non-liberals out of society completely.
K: and once again, who said this, where can we find this evidence out
for ourselves? who has tried to ‘‘purge non-liberals’’ and how did
they try this? name names…
Kropotkin
1 Like
Homosexuality it is true has been around since the very beginning of human civilization throughout history, it only becomes damaging when it goes from a small minority of the population spreading to half of the population or just over half. When that happens we begin to see a lot of demographic undermining.
Despite what liberals want to believe otherwise demographics do matter within society. Demographic collapse also collapses entire societies as well.
Homosexuals shouldn’t be allowed to adopt children. They want all the perks of heterosexuals without being of that themselves.
If you don’t reproduce in a heterosexual manner children should not be afforded to you.
MrAuthoritarian:
Homosexuality it is true has been around since the very beginning of human civilization, it only becomes damaging when it goes from a minority of the population spreading to half of the population or just over half. When that happens we begin to see a lot of demographic undermining.
K: just over half? dude, at most, at most, 12% of the population
is homosexual… how do we get half with there only being
12% of the population being gay… stop making shit up…
The second thing is this: how is having gay people so terrible for our
society… see, it is just assumed that in some fashion having lots
of gay people will in some way, some how, damage the state/society…
but how? you might say demographics, but life isn’t about
demographics… it is about actual people, doing real things…
so, give me exactly how having ‘‘many’’ gays will damage
society?
Kropotkin
1 Like
I try to be tolerant of homosexuals, but that tolerance has limits.
Compare the years of the 1960s to present day 2026 and observe how the homosexual population has steadily increased overtime.
MrAuthoritarian:
Compare the years of the 1960s to present day 2026 and observe how the homosexual population has steadily increased overtime.
K: and there are simply more people today, thus there are more
homosexuals today…and once again, explain to me why that
is so bad? you say, demographics, ok, do you have anything else,
besides that? how exactly are homosexuals a danger or a problem
for the state/society? remove demographics and you got nothing…
Kropotkin
Thankfully a majority of Asia hasn’t been infected by the western disease yet. Lucky for them, I envy that.
And once again people who know nothing about Buddhism or my beliefs. Funny how so called liberals around here do that.
and anybody who has studied Buddhism, can see that
you are not Buddhist… for Buddhism isn’t about hatred,
as you seem to hate everyone, Buddhism isn’t about bringing
about dictatorships, as you seem to want, Buddhism
isn’t about enjoying watching the end of a society…
as you clearly seem to want… You are in fact,
not Buddhist as you don’t follow any of the precepts that
make up Buddhism… the reality is, you are really not much
more than a troll… and not a very good one at that…
Kropotkin
1 Like
I am sure you liberals would love more than anything to remove demographics from everything pertaining to society but by doing so you would only be dooming yourselves overtime.
There are necessary things and conditions for societies to thrive, if you remove those things societies will collapse to the point of dying.
The liberal believes in freedom and liberation from everything, such is the liberal way, but ultimately what does you liberals in constantly is that you have yet to see that not even liberals are free or liberated from consequences.
It’s like Mr. A can’t help himself. Apparently he’s never studied logic because he’s boxing his shadow (aka producing strawmen). Not that he seems to care as he doesn’t listen to intelligent people, just quacks like Realun and killakrackass or whatever.
At least you’re on the right forum dude. We’ll develop your brain eventually. The echo chambers are not doing you right. Learn from your betters but first learn to acknowledge that you’re behind the learning curve right now.
1 Like
I try my best not to hate anybody. I try my best to be compassionate towards everyone.
Granted, I am not perfect and sometimes fall short of such ideals myself.
Buddha supported monarchy himself and a majority of the ancient Buddhist world was also monarchy. The practice still survives to this day in Buddhist nations.
Buddha taught about the horrific suffering illusion of what society and human civilization really is. Who wouldn’t want that all to end?
Ultimately my philosophy is about the end of human suffering and if we cannot get rid of human suffering altogether at the very least to lessen it around the world somehow.
1 Like
