I have nothing against men wearing makeup. They can look amazing with it. Think Sean Connery in Highlander. Adam Lambert (and Ant for that matter).
You just don’t ‘get’ anything do you? A so-called ‘Terf’ is simply a woman (or man) who knows what a woman is and wants to keep women’s spaces for women. Why would you have a problem with that?
It isn’t set to private, MagsJ. What do you think is wrong with it? The link or my account? 
Please help!
1 Like
I said Feminazis and did I mention your username? Was I talking to you?
I can’t talk about Feminazis without you taking it personal?
There are a lot of women out there making fun of JD Vance’s eyelashes. And a lot of women would reject men for wearing any kind of makeup at all.
1 Like
Not many men could pull off obvious makeup in every day life. It’s not mainstream fashion at this time in history. That wasn’t always the way of course. That said, I’m pretty sure most of your male politicians wear makeup. Your president is slathered in it 
pssst. You know perfectly well you were referring to me. Lying is so unbecoming. You don’t seem to have any problem with actual ‘Nazis’ (the present day equivalent) oddly enough 
I must say, however, that JD Vance’s eyelashes have never occupied even a single microsecond of my time.
1 Like
‘‘JD Vance’s eyelashes are due to a rare genetic condition called Distichiasis, where a second row of eyelashes grows from the eyelid, giving them a fuller, double-row appearance, a trait often noted by observers and discussed online.’’
Elizabeth Taylor had the same condition. It has nothing to do with testosterone.
1 Like
.
I meant mine.. 
.
Your’s is public, so not to worry.
1 Like
More slanderous untrue accusations.
When will ya learn!
1 Like
When empires decline, decadence and degeneracy is a symptom…..we are in the end of the American Empire.
2 Likes
Trump doesn’t wear makeup? He’s naturally orange, just on his face? Extraordinary! He must be preserved in vinegar immediately for future study!
1 Like
I was talking about the other parts of your post, obviously. If Trump wears makeup, don’t know, don’t care.
1 Like
Which part? As a ‘philosopher’ you should be more specific.
1 Like
Just becasue something comes to be, in nature, does not make it advantageous.
Mutations are part of natural selection.
Human systems protect many mutations from nature’s methods of weeding out unfit mutations.
This propagates and compounds them, over time, producing many psychosomatic side-effects.
Only in one species has homosexuality become a lifestyle, and exclusive, because it is a genetic dead-end.
Same thing applies to many other sexual preferences.
As such, sexual degeneracy is a sign of systemic decline….since the system is what shelters such mutations from nature’s consequences.
1 Like
Not true. It has always been around. Acceptance and normalising of it is a sign of ‘systemic decline’.
1 Like
Because ALL human systems are sheltering…..so the accumulation of unfit mutations manifests sexual dysfunctions, OVER time. All systems collapse, because all human systems protect unfit mutations.
1 Like
You obviously understand nothing about social evolution or humankind in general for that matter.
1 Like
Predictable response.
You remain clueless.
Nature doesn’t care about your socially progressive activism, sweetheart….nor about your idealistic dreams.
Human interventions on the environment produce pollution….as they do when they intervene upon natural selection…to domesticate animals including humans.
1 Like
How is it possible for someone to be that thick? What can anyone do with that? Sigh. Just leave it to fester in its own filth. Nothing else you can do.
1 Like
Your statement is doing a lot of sloppy work in very few words (as usual), and you need to unpack whether you’re talking about visibility, self-identification, culture, or whether you’re just expressing discomfort. Vague claims don’t survive daylight very well.
My take is that they’re not ‘more gay’ so much as less frightened of saying who they are. We need to shift the focus from some imagined generational abnormality to social conditions. My long-held view is that silence is not agreement and previous generations were quieter because the cost of honesty was higher.
Another point is that every generation looks strange to the one before it. Ours did too. Generational panic seems to be a recurring human habit. Long hair, women working, divorce, rock music, gender roles, same pattern, different surface. So what’s the problem you’re pointing to?
People making their own lives harder is one thing. Making other people’s lives harder for no good reason is another. Your protest is warranted only where harm or malignancy is involved. Someone else’s orientation, by itself, doesn’t qualify.
Something someone else said is true: if you loosen repression, diversity becomes visible. Past state control and gaslighting haven’t been helpful, and pressure distorts perception; release reveals reality. Perhaps they’re just more honest than we were allowed to be.
2 Likes
I wish I was gay. I can’t go outside because I will eventually get emotionally attached to some random girl, then hate myself for lacking the courage to approach her. Or approach her but she will not be single, they are never single.
Just look at the other forum members here… being heterosexual causes neurosis. I wish I could be gay, but even if I get a gay boyfriend, I will only be bisexual, not gay. Even if I take estrogen, I will just be lesbian, and it wont solve the underlying problem of emotional attachment to random girls. I’m like an cartoon protagonist/comic relief character that cannot help but feel attached to random pretty girls when I go outside.
homosexuality is empire decline
i’m not aware of any causal link of that. asked ai and they dont seem to know anything about it either. I got As in history but I’m no means a University class, PhD level historian.
Roman Empire reality
Same-sex relations, especially male homoeroticism, occurred throughout Rome’s history—not just in decline—with norms tied to class, dominance, and penetration roles rather than modern identity. Perceived increases in “passive” behavior among elites during the Imperial era reflected anxieties over lost republican virtues like libertas, but historians attribute Rome’s fall (ca. 476 CE) to economic woes, military overextension, invasions, and civil strife.
Persian Empire context
As discussed previously, Achaemenid Persia showed elite homoerotic practices alongside Zoroastrian religious taboos, with no evidence of heightened same-sex activity or persecution uniquely during decline. The pattern mirrors Rome: tolerance varied by context, but decline stemmed from conquests, rebellions, and administration failures, not sexuality
.
Only in one species has homosexuality become a lifestyle, and exclusive, because it is a genetic dead-end.
Now come on bro. You know better than this, I taught you this before. I said sheep, domesticated sheep, have exclusive homosexuality. Domestication is civilization. Humans are civilized, domesticated, etc. Then there are also giraffes which are “pretty much gay’ but bicurious, in the wild. Exclusive homosexuality, is indeed a genetic dead end, but not “pretty much gay with occasional sex with females.’
Because ALL human systems are sheltering…..so the accumulation of unfit mutations manifests sexual dysfunctions, OVER time. All systems collapse, because all human systems protect unfit mutations.
I’m not convinced that is the main cause of human homosexuality. Not putting my foot down and saying its 100% incorrect, but i’m not totally convinced.
With exclusive homosexuality in male sheep is that the result of unfit mutations?
Second and more importantly, I think homosexuality is caused by hormones, domestication and environment pollutants. The genetics are the same. You don’t simply have 0 gays in one generation then all of a sudden a bunch of gays in the next generation. Its the same genetics. The only thing that changed is the environment, hormones and culture. And if there is a genetic component, it was Abrahamic homophobia culture in earlier culture which enforced the reproduction of “gayish mutations” that would have otherwise never reproduced in the first place.
1 Like
I never go out of my way to be harmful, mean, or antagonizing towards homosexuals. I try my best to be polite towards everyone.
I just find the trend alarming when there is so many of them in younger people. I question the long term sustainability of such cultural sexual trends.
1 Like