Genocide in Gaza? Part II

.
Ahh!

1 Like

…and that Armageddon, seems to be the culmination of the global actions, over the last year.
.
So here we are…

According to this reportage, the IDF helicopters implement the Hannibal directive because they were unable to distinguish friend from foe.
“Mass Hannibal” — We killed Israelis on 7 October, says Israeli air force colonel (youtube.com)
From Haaretz:
image
image

Was there any warning? Of course:

There really IS only one way to save from being drawn into Armageddon: my gut level instint tells me :heart_eyes:
The belief of simulated warfare, at the very least, that does include war on the planet and war up above.
, to fight with the ignorance down below.

That angels have been tempted and fell is testament to the ire, that God’s memory failing , it had to be recollected faithfully.

()()()()()()()()()()()(

There is no equivalence.

Five minutes in one has glimpsed many lifetimes of horror. How many angels have to die for you to cry? Under that Gazan sky there is no mercy.

1 Like

Israel has destroyed Gaza and killed over 40,000 people yet Netanyahu has presented no post-war plan for the future of the region going forward. The Biden administration’s weakness or complicity in the situation is a glaring liability facing Harris. Of course, Trump offers no substantive alternative. So, the situation results in voter apathy.

It’s not antisemitic to protest Israel:

1 Like

For a half Jewish person like me that’s an extremely delicate tightrope to walk on as an ex-European could testify to.

Sensitives, get that as soon as getting through the border from Austria.

My whole German-Schwabian-Hungarian family would have disowned me if I looked anything other than German, to be perfectly blunt, I would have been toast otherwise.

)(

‘The current war in the Middle East, which affects not only Israel Gaza and the West Bank, but also other countries such as Lebanon Egypt or Jordan, is a complex conflict that is almost impossible to untangle, which makes the matter even more difficult the roots of this conflict go far back into the past’

‘Just outside the borders of the State of Israel there are a million people who have been displaced from their homes […]. They live mainly on handouts from a makeshift and inadequately funded UN organisation in enforced inaction frustration and bitterness, more than a third of them in refugee camps […]
It is not only peace in the Middle East that is at risk - the whole world is living in the shadow of a nuclear catastrophe. A solution to this problem is necessary, among other things, for the security of the whole world’

‘You probably thought these last sentences were my commentary on the situation, but the text is more than 65 years old, from 1958 to be precise, and comes from the book on Palestine with texts by Hanna Arend that have not yet been published in Germany about her view of this war, the conflict that is currently so preoccupying us.’
Gert Scobel
Was würde Hannah Arendt heute dazu sagen? | Gert Scobel (youtube.com)

All i needed to hear brother, lol.

Keep on keeping on

Yeah man

No , I did not think you wrote the above less than resourcefully, look, with our limited communication, one can gain insight by what I believe is a over empathetic attempt to marginalize tangled issues,

The complexity of the problem “almost impossible to untangle” quote, is such that by the look of it prima facie, is such that it begs reductive ‘surgery’ so as to be able to figure out the limits of within which such impressions maybe open to some conjecture, analysis, if you. will, in the traditional sense .

The ‘eye’politics that is involved causes various deceptive techniques by varied methods tried, which subsequently relegate to simpler ways of interpretation .
The shifting sands of the desert’s sands, blown about by the winds , obfuscate the regional borders which tribal communities tend to want to define more clearly and with more lasting warranties . The obfuscation is a double edged sword in the desert, which further complicate the scenario by inter and intra national conflict, with the usual methods of playing various blame games, within and without said regional communities, all uniting into major configurations, such as the Arab Legue, consisting with many tribal and regional communities on one hand, and the more specific , more singularly comprised nation of Israel, which is more ‘global’ as Jews who had been resettled in a geographic area, then perhaps the varied tribal nations of the Arab world, who’s identity has never had the global reach of the Diaspora.

Palestinian people are at times reminded of their possible displacement to other areas , such as the Trans-Jordan, that as far as my understanding goes could have suited them, but King Hussein did not or could not go for it, without disadvantage to Jordan’s population.

But these efforts to loosely define the shifting borderline problems , which are becoming progressively endemic, if the use of the word comes near to a more generally appropriated space, or situation.

So the last rung in this ‘analysis’ is , how identity, wether personal, regional , or national, can play a role in a regional recognition of identifiable traits which factor in within loosely defined boundaries?

And finally, can the model of the United States’ multilateral approach to the mixing bowl of traits, come to real changes, in identifiable traits other than those perceived as short term solutions to the effects of migration and immigration due to dispossessional economic determinants.?

And, is it in the US ecenomic interest to promote such method of exporting the paradigmn , to sustain it’s own self interest(aka:the singular capitalization of it’s own identifiable set of values) in order to limit it’s own social bounderies , using only the permiable boundary to interact with those out of bound with others’ varied identifiable mix of characteristic values?

The singularly noted reductive analysis of ‘it’s’ own economy, as distinct fro others is the foundation of all abstract bars to normalizing relations, and at these critical times, perceptions change to further hamper the amelioration of progress to bring about more clarity in regard to create more reality from the forged abstraction.

Signs and symptoms of immature left’s pre motion ;

)(

ussia tells Israel to not even consider attacking Iranian nuclear facilities, TASS says

By Reuters, 5 hrs ago

Reuters

Following

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia is warning Israel to not even consider striking Iranian nuclear facilities, state news agency TASS quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov as saying on Thursday.

After Iran’s missile attack on Israel on Oct. 1, there has been speculation that Israel could strike Iran’s nuclear facilities, as it has long threatened to do.

“We have repeatedly warned and continue to warn, to caution (Israel) against even hypothetically considering the possibility of a strike on (Iranian) nuclear facilities and nuclear infrastructure,” Ryabkov was quoted by TASS as saying.

“This would be a catastrophic development and a complete negation of all existing principles in the area of ​​ensuring nuclear safety.”

It was not clear in what form Moscow had conveyed such a message to Israel.

Israel and Western countries have long feared that Iran is developing a nuclear bomb under the cover of a civilian nuclear energy programme, something Tehran denies.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said in a statement on Tuesday that Israel would listen to the United States, which has also cautioned against striking nuclear facilities in Iran, but would determine its actions according to its own national interest.

The statement was attached to a Washington Post article which said Netanyahu had told President Joe Biden’s administration that Israel would strike Iranian military targets, not nuclear or oil targets.

Russian state media also quoted Ryabkov as saying that Moscow was in constant contact with Iran, irrespective of the level of tensions in the region.

Russia has strengthened ties with the Islamic Republic since the start of its war in Ukraine and is preparing to sign a major partnership agreement with Tehran.

(Reporting by Reuters; Writing by Maxim Rodionov and Mark Trevelyan; Editing by Andrew Osborn)

“Mass murderer Yahya Sinwar, who was responsible for the massacre and atrocities of October 7, was killed today by IDF soldiers," Israel’s foreign minister said in a statement.

In an old video, viral after his death, Sinwar can be heard talking about being killed by the Israeli forces and said that it would be the “greatest gift” they could give him. “The greatest gift the enemy and the occupation can give me is to assassinate me so I can go to Allah as a martyr by their hand,” he said, in the video captured in 2021, two years before Hamas’ attack on Israel.

Now Sinwar understood that the cause of Hamas is an idea bigger than himself or his troops. Why doesn’t Netanyahu see this? He does. That’s why the murder of civilians in Gaza is intentional i.e. genocide.There is no truth without awareness.

There is an undertow to the above reporting having to do with a ‘slight’ difference of those constructing modern political philosophy; that borne out of both German and German Jewish extraction.

The identifiable difference are slight cause to the larger affect of sensitivity to sustainable nationalism’s post modern effect, hence the cause and effect of deontological justification.

The apprehended powers’ forces are wills according to their present deeply felt s(S)tatehood.

The only appreciable difference that can utilize the changing loci that can actually effect a perception of a coming clarity, is through transforming the chaotic apperception that is working in and through the the constructed and deconstructed visualizations of causes and effects of chaos.

The agents of transformation need to assert their will, to power a new clarity , which primarily views the misuse of the power to will in destructive ways, that cause the illusion that ultimate reductive mayhem would finally result from the way things are becoming darker, more unmanageable and unstable.

On the contrary, one glimmer of light transforms suddenly, the gloom of an overwhelmingly determined state of existence into faint but hopeful clarity whose’e focus is the transforming force of that undertow which nurtures through the whole gamut of what is unseen and of the highest value in Creation’s objective unstoppable transforming resolve.

A new ethos will leave no one behind at the cost of singular exception, we as human beings must shoulder this antiquated notion together.

Blessed are the peacemakers for theirs is the Kingdom of God.(or something like that)

()()()

Matthew 5-9

“ 6 Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled. 7 Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy. 8 Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God. 9Blessed are the peacemakers : for they shall be called the children of God. 10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. 11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. 12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.”

For there is a hidden unilateral hope of agreement hidden under this bilateral morass, that now more then ever wants and needs to grow through the nourishing dirt , as the flower of the lotus thus exemplified;

In order to agree not to disagree, but to nourish and guard thet seed of hope that flower comes to bear.

To bear arms of hope and love not those seeded with hate and distrust.

Sadly, neither Netanyahu nor Hamas are signaling readiness for peace. Biden is pushing for a ceasefire and threatening to cut arms support if Israel doesn’t open Gaza to more humanitarian. I favor that position. But, so far, Netanyahu has ignored Biden with impunity. That makes Biden look ineffectual. Netanyahu would prefer Trump elected president. Harris promises to continued support for the elusive “two state solution.” Netanyahu wants to continue the status quo . And no wonder: For him, holding onto power depends on keeping the war going. Like Trump, Netanyahu believes that whatever is good for him is good for the country. To sacrifice his own interests would require personal sacrifice. I’m unaware that Netanyahu has ever exhibited such behavior. Awareness is essential for truth.