Actually, since philosophy is so imbued with morality - what is the penalty to a particular lady’s soul should she not opt to go about with her blouse around her nethers…? It is in my view, akin to wilfull manslaughter. I mean hell, and I’m sure Tents would agree, if we could extend women’s lifespans by going around with our nads hanging out, purely with the intent of doing good, we would.
Call me selfish guys, but I’ll only be getting my baps out for the guy I’m dating Ohhhhhhhhhh, so that’s why he insisted on taking that picture of my boobs on his phone… and there was I thinking it was just to perve over them in my absence
I’m disillusioned. Surely you can see that with this knowledge, it becomes a civic duty to keep males healthy and alive as long as possible. This isn’t about being selfish, but responsibility to the species. I’m sure Parliament will pass a special dispensation law when this study get’s wider attention. So get out in front of this! Be a leader! We’re waiting for the pics…
Hey, I didn’t write the study, I just reported it. But the conclusion is obvious. Men live longer with mammary ogling. Come on girls, help us out. Still waiting for pics…
I think it was Al Jolsen back in the 1920’s that even wrote a song… “Mammaries! Mammaries! I’d walk a mile to see your mammaries!” Or something like that.
nice try Tent, but seeing that my baps aren’t as big as the female’s in the attached link, I think I’ll leave the job to those with bigger boobs than I
I think you’re slightly off with the wording there a tad Tent, but no matter.
Well, Mags, it isn’t about size, it’s about seeing eye to nipple. It’s about being patriotic and all that. Just think of all the males on the tube tomorrow morning! You could lower their blood pressure and increase their heart rate and perhaps save the nation! Just the idea of such a noble sacrifice brings tears to my eyes. (sniff)
Alright boys, settle down – pfft, as if you needed a scientific excuse to look. Yeah, right.
I know this thread is all in good fun, but I do have to say, it was downright depressing to read through some of the comments from that article.
From a woman’s standpoint, it is discouraging how simple so many men are. So easily solved. Where’s the fun in that? (Although to be fair, I’m sure there are women who prefer their men uncomplicated and predictable.)
It’s like acquiring a taste for Shakespeare, but the only books in the library are See Spot Run; like learning how to tackle differential equations, but only ever getting assigned 2+2.
Facile, but not very interesting for those of us who enjoy a good puzzle.
One of the sexes has to be simple, otherwise we’d never reproduce.
Day 1: “No, I’ve got a headache.”
Day 2: “No, this time I’ve got a headache.”
Day 3: “I feel like you just want me for my body.”
Day 4: “Huh, I feel like you don’t meet my emotional needs.”
Day 1005: “Sometimes I just want to cuddle, is that a crime…?”
Day 2456: “The doc says I’ve hit the menopause.”
“Oh crap, and my sperm-count just went negative - my balls are sucking them back in.”
“Hey - weren’t we gonna have kids…?”
“Er…”
OK, it’s been a bit of fun, but I thought it interesting that we have to have a scientific study to splain that males and females are visually attractive to one another (all body parts included). Men checking a woman out. How profound! Now we need the scientific study to explain women buying a new wardrobe yearly, the 30 pair of shoes, the bottle after bottle of unguents and creams, 10 or 15 lipsticks (various shades), and the rest of the cosmetic paraphenalia. No need to mention boob plasticizing, tummy tucks, face lifts, etc. and for what purpose? :-"