I might agree it’s probably true that the universe or the whole has an eternal and necessary identity (in the sense of identicality, of course, not personality), and that all its parts are subsumed in its eternal and necessary being. However, its parts are not eternally so subsumed, for they are not eternal; we did not exist for most of the past and won’t exist for most of the future. Moreover, the universe or the whole always has and always will change; it only does so in a necessary way, and in this consists its eternal identity.
need to clearly distinguish between eternally subsumed (or coeternal) (perdurance) (the whole face of a circle)
and potentially infinite (endurance) (a golden spiral filling in the face of the whole circle)
and how neither needs to be (or means the same as) past eternal
Don’t you have some kind of convoluted sketch of that?
What if all ideas are just funny and ridiculous? A circle exists as a circle only when a human tries to draw it. Otherwise, nature doesn’t tolerate geometry.
Infinity is fundamentally nonsense, denying the very meaning of existence, which would cease the moment its goal is reached.
The truth is, the Beginning could not have existed — there was no time.
What do you mean convoluted?
There was never no time. But every moment is alpha/omega.
Dangit. Try to be non-ridiculous and I might perma-unblock.
…obv you don’t know the goal is to iterate self=other without end?
Sounds like an interesting idea.
Surely that is already happening in American schools according to Trump and Musk.
You made me laugh. But why transform, why change? What’s the goal? Remember this: Existence knows itself through change, and that’s the only reason it transforms into different forms. As soon as it fully knows itself, the Apocalypse will come.
1 Like
Aren’t you tired of babbling nonsense? The continuation of human biology is synthetic bodies. That’s what all these experiments are for. Obviously, synthetic beings don’t need sexual organs. Stop dwelling on things you don’t understand.
Nice projection 
Not bad. Especially when backed by evidence. And even more so with the willingness to provide answers to what you’re desperately trying to understand.
It’s worse, actually. There’s a … well. Hm. More than one. Not all Venns.
I remember that day. Zoiks.
Well, what are you waiting for? Post them all here in this thread!
No, it’s nonsense. Nonexistence is no better than existence, though also no worse. In fact, nonexistence is already a fact: there are never any “beings”, for being means eternal identity. This is what I meant two weeks ago when I told promethean75:
Do you actually believe any of this shit you posted?
Its utter nonsense, like some post saying 2+2=5 or something.
1 Like
Having Autism is fine, if they are Superior autists. There are some Autists who are superior such as Sheldon Cooper, Sherlock Holmes, etc.
then main issue seems to be that you are a member of the council of karens, autism is only secondary to that. many karens seem to touch grass yet are karens.
1 Like
Oh trust me, he believes the shit that he types.
1 Like
it feels like reading something from chatgpt2 or one of those prototype gpts. When you call them out on the horseshit they just keep going on and on
1 Like