Good is good and bad is bad (yes morality is really that easy)

You have a limited idea of good and bad if that is your only example.

This is nothing against you personally, but whenever somebody disses Autism or considers it an insult to describe someone else as autistic, and not that my opinion matters to you or should, but they automatically tattoo an L on their forehead in my mind (not in a rent-free way, but in a … there’s the exit … way).

Nature knows no conditions.. same with good<->bad.

..sorry Bob.. you sound like Ich..whatevertheirnameis, in this regard.

No.
Good and bad is subjective.
LOL
What is good for you is not good for another.

Yes :+1:

Glad we can agree on something!

1 Like

First they came for the Trans, but I was not trans so did nothing; next they came for the asylum seekers, the immigrants, the blacks…

To keep the momentum of hate going, autistics are next.
Be prepared to go on a register and submit to being “cured”.

One day the world will be perfect. White Dad will go to work whilst white Mom stays home looking after the 2.5 white children, and they will have a puppy to look after. Every Saturday, Dads will ge together to watch sports, and on SUnday they all all trot off to church to bow down to King Trump..

All the nasty deviants will be gone, and the roses will bloom in every garden.

1 Like

I knew you were an efilist :joy:

Maybe we can construct a separate topic to discuss/debate efilism. Since you understand the issues in this topic here, which apparently and very sadly most do not, I think you’d be a good intellectual sparring partner for me in an efilism discussion.

1 Like

So many misconceptions so little time.

All objective claims rely 100% of agreement, without exception.

That is what objectivity is.

I learnt in nursing that my intentions may be good, but if I haven’t consulted the patient, my actions could be perceived as bad. Relational.

..because, that’s a good thing to do. :wink:

Next thing you know, they’ll be taking your baby’s live organs and changing them into the opposite gender before grafting them onto rats, burning your leftover baby material in waste-to-energy incinerators.

:raised_fist:

1 Like

Don’t try to shift blame from the sick head to the healthy one. Are you capable of understanding that it’s necessary to use two measures of understanding: subjective and objective? If not, I sympathize, though I cannot help. I admit there might be difficulties with translation (since English is not my language), but nevertheless, this does not change the essence — it’s necessary to use two measures of understanding.

this is unironically the most autistic post i have ever seen.

imagine being offended over a casual reference to autism.

complain about it to your woke DEI lords and masters

you are extremely cringe, you have no social skills, and you think I hate autistics… and imply nazism because i made a casual reference in a post about autism, OMEGALOL. touch grass

you people need drugs… it is obvious the robot autism is strong with most of you, can’t tell what’s up and what’s down… most of you need drugs and to touch grass, chronically online mofos…

if you had drugs then you would obviously know the difference of what’s good and what’s bad… you have had the robotic autism too long, been roboticized by eggman for too long, can no longer tell whats up and what’s down… and now we are having some pointless horse-shit debate about whats clear and whats obvious and whats good and whats bad

The concept of Jesus is different. A representative of Jewish sexual minorities, for the calls of love (sex) between men. In order to make those who believe the Jews think with the ass.

1 Like

Strange. I touched grass all day and it didn’t cure my self-diagnosed Autism.

We’ll see how this goes.

Have you touched grass today? Maybe a bit too much of the wacky kind?

“Of course”! :sweat_smile:

No, it’s nonsense. Nonexistence is no better than existence, though also no worse. In fact, nonexistence is already a fact: there are never any “beings”, for being means eternal identity. This is what I meant two weeks ago when I told promethean75:

“The gist of your objections implies that genuine communication and community is possible. It implies that the ‘we’ who communicate and ‘things’ communicated—including this exchange!—are more than nothing. In reality they are meaningless impressions, dreams whose dreamers are themselves dreams.” (Neumann, Liberalism, “Nihilism Challenged and Defended”.)

Anecdote.
Scientists decided to run an experiment. They set up two cages: in one, they placed a primate, and in the other, they managed to persuade a homeless alcoholic to participate, since no one else agreed.
In the primate’s cage, they hung a banana out of reach; in the alcoholic’s cage, they hung a bottle — also just out of reach.

The scientists began observing.
The primate jumped, thought a little, then found a stick and knocked down the banana.
Meanwhile, the alcoholic just kept jumping.

Eventually, the scientists grew tired of waiting and said:
— Stop and think!
To which the alcoholic replied:
— What’s there to think about? Gotta keep jumping!

Now a question:
In all your musings about “gender relations” and “connections,” are you really any different from that patient in the cage?
No desire to think why you were made exactly the way you are?
And who needed it to be so?


You won’t get out of the cage.
For this reason, I will give you an answer. Although you most likely won’t understand it.
People were divided into two sexes not just to reproduce, but to make mistakes while continuing their lineage.
…
And… keep jumping, it’s funny.

That meaning is true for God in a necessary way. For the rest of us it is contingently true, in that we are eternally subsumed in necessary being.