Heart; Selecting the right woman

[JulyThirty]

No love received none given.

You are animals, loveless jerks.

[futureone]

i dont love you and i have mostly contempt for the human race.

and you’re retarded for expecting me to know what your sockpuppet account is and then judging me for not knowing what your philosophy of your sockpuppet is.

[futureone]

If i had to guess your sockpuppet would be daniel j, but I’m hesitant to say that because its a big risk cause if you arent daniel then he might feel pissed and insulted and embarassed to be you. so if im wrong, give my apologies to daniel.

[JulyThirty]

Not embarrassed at all. My disposition is a reaction to loveless, unsupportive animals.

[futureone]

you are less than a loveless unsupportive animal since everytime you get on here all you have is insults and no philosophy.

[JulyThirty]

You obviously are aware of the other material.

You are loveless, mindless animals, creeps, chasing resources and sex, wasting time with inane gossip.

You have no ideas, no coherent system of work. You are lifeless, incompetent losers wasting time and obscuring real philosophy.

[promethean75]

“Just wait till you realize reincarnation exists”

That would be awesome, and I’d do it all again, no prob. Only next time, i hope i won’t hesitate like i did in this go-round. It’s the fear of death that’ll getcha, fear that this life is all there is, so you hesitate, hoping and waiting on something that never happens. This is exactly what got me in this life; fear and too much patience. Now I’m gonna be late. What I should have done at 40 I’ll do at 60 and as such be able to enjoy it much less.

[futureone]

daniel j’s philosophy (you sound like you claim you are him) is a circular philosophy, mediocre philosophy.

existence exists, profound. and you made it a wall of text just finding different ways to say existence exist. no science, no substance, just finding different ways to say words. And you got an ai to praise you, congratulations, ai is programmed to simp and rizz people on every statement for no reason, it gets annoying after a while. I think it was 2024 or 2023 and ai didn’t simp and rizz all the time on every statement for no reason.

im going to go read your existence exists thing again to make sure if it is as mediocre as i remember it.

[futureone]

you don’t get it. your memory is wiped upon death, you will not be able to fulfill your fantasy of being super-human like you are hoping. everyone thinks they can do better in hindsight. and you will probably born into cowardly abrahamic indoctrination and raised by zionists who worship billionairres. you wont be born high level and learn maximum philosophy. you will probably believe retarded abrahamism and support zionic wars until your teens where you finally encounter philosophy.

[JulyThirty]

@futureone

daniel j’s philosophy (you sound like you claim you are him) is a circular philosophy, mediocre philosophy.

existence exists, profound. and you made it a wall of text just finding different ways to say existence exist. no science, no substance, just finding different ways to say words.

Science operates within the parameters presented within the ontology.

But of course you have not read the essay to know what is even being conveyed within it. You are too busy spamming the forums with scatter-brained, disjointed inane nonsense such as this:

I hate god. I hate the world. I hate the universe

Can’t sleep. Too much fear and hatred in me and contempt. Had to post. Had to post how much i hate god and this god forsaken world. I look down on this world with hatred, hatred of humanity, they are nothing more than lowly apes to me. All this world is is crooked politicians and their billionaire sycophants all trying to make the world a dystopian shit-hole of despair. We could have a United Humanity. We could have Peace. We could have Prosperity. Instead all we have is billionaire parasites …

The philosophy is not circular. The definitions are operational, not circular labels.

However, since all is existence, and all terms and things are parts of existence, a certain degree of circularity, in that sense, is unavoidable and rather trivial.

[futureone]

Sorry that my philosophy has too much raw humanity for your turbo-autism to digest.

My philosophy is the polar opposite of yours, my philosophy is a message to destroy the universe. Your philosophy is that of a sycophant priest or scribe of the universe trying to brainwash everyone with circular sophistry about how “existence always exists”. Man, good job, trying to convince everyone that existence always exists, now we are all probably stuck here longer because you, what an asshole.

[futureone]

So I read your “existence exists” crap again. Wow. What a bunch of inane ramblings that I ever did see, you should actually get an award for it because its a whole nother level of inane wafflings like never before, onto an epic level of it.

When I read your works I picture some broken Ai missing circuits sitting atop a hill on an empty monastery, frantically writing schizo ramblings.

Existence Is Infinite (2025)

Existence Is Infinite Daniel J. Lavender Abstract Existence is infinite, existence is unlimited. Only nothing or nonexistence could actually limit existence; however, nothing or nonexistence is not and cannot be. Existence is infinite, existence is not limited as there is [not] nothing beyond existence to limit or restrict it. Terms And Definitions Existence (n.): Being; that which is perceived, at least in part; that which is interacted with, at least in part, in some way. Infinite (adj.)…

after reading paragraphs and paragraphs, nothing of substance is ever proved or discussed. Just circular ramblings and sophistry. Elaborate waffling about nothing. No proof or any discussion other than finding different ways to say “existence exists”.

[MySiddhi]

Here is my solution for pleasing my mate and having copious opportunity to be picky when choosing a mate;

Erotic Hypnosis; don’t read if you’re sexually weak minded or spiritually weak generally - Philosophy Forums / Psychology and Mind - I Love Philosophy

[daniel_j_lavender]

@futureone

daniel j’s philosophy (you sound like you claim you are him) is a circular philosophy, mediocre philosophy.

It’s a complete foundational ontology. That’s by no means mediocre. Philosophy today is more specialized, philosophy like this is rare. Philosophy like this hasn’t come along in decades, perhaps centuries.

It’s similar to the philosophy of Parmenides yet provides explicit, functional terms and definitions. The ontology also features theological versatility, something else not found in Parmenides’ philosophy. Parmenides didn’t even explicitly define his terms.

The ontology is also comparable to Spinoza, however much more concise and accessible without the pantheistic rigidity. The philosophy presented is quite significant.

@futureone

existence exists, profound. and you made it a wall of text just finding different ways to say existence exist.

That is a grand oversimplification. Nowhere in the essay is “existence exists” explicitly expressed. In fact argumentation and explication are provided to address that very issue:

@daniel_j_lavender

The Definition Of Existence

Standard definitions of existence are often ambiguous and circular. They provide no means of substantiation. Existence is defined as simply being, being defined as simply existence. The terms form a vacuous loop of abstraction with no substantiation in concrete, real world instances.

The definition presented herein resolves that issue. The definition is functional and operational. Existence is defined; existence is that which is perceived or interacted with, at least in part. With the definition provided one could see a tree, touch a leaf, hear a bird or smell a flower and declare existence.

This is further addressed in the Additional Notes section:

@daniel_j_lavender

Existence is not merely defined as “that which is” because “is” would have to be addressed which would involve perception. The matter implicitly involves perception and interaction; the term “is” only has significance with perception.

…which ties into the Significance Of Perception section:

@daniel_j_lavender

The Significance Of Perception

Perception or consciousness is part of the basis of defining existence because conscious entities, such as ourselves, are who this issue matters to. Existence, things can be without consciousness or awareness, but consciousness or awareness must be included because that’s what we are. For our purposes existence is that which is, or can, at least partially, be perceived. It involves perception both because perception is part of existence and because the issue intimately concerns conscious entities. It implicitly involves perception or consciousness because that is the process used for such inquiry and exchange.

@daniel_j_lavender

Perception is a parametric base allowing us to ground existence in practical, concrete ways.

Continuing, you stated:

@futureone

no science

Well, the subject is philosophy, not science. Although the essay does address and include science:

@daniel_j_lavender

All inquiries, including those in science, involve perception and interaction. The line between a semantic test and a truly empirical test is blurred. Scientific tests are not independent of observers. Scientists observing experiments are conscious beings using perceptive tools to interpret data. The data itself is a result of interaction between phenomena. Thus science operates within the definition of existence provided.

…physics is mentioned here:

@daniel_j_lavender

An ocean is an example of material space. An ocean, or at least part of one, can be touched and is obviously tangible. An ocean provides material resistance because it consists of densely arranged molecules and atoms. Relatively the vacuum of outer space is an example of immaterial space. The vacuum provides no resistance as it concerns minimal molecules and atomic arrangements allowing material bodies motion.

The vacuum does not concern matter in the terrestrial sense. The vacuum concerns quantum fields, radiation and sparingly atoms or molecules. Too few molecules are present to form tangible, solid material.

Reading the entire essay is recommended.

[promethean75]

Stop being modest, Danny Lav. Parmenides and Spinoza are mere footnotes to your work.