Yes, that! 
I think I knew that but now I am not so sure, but it’s ok, that uncertainty is certain , , anyway not worth loosing sleep over it.
that?
That’s that.
But what’s really that what’s that?
That’s enough of that! 
.
“Humour hides a thousand melancholies, that may accumulate over time and reside within”.
~MagsJ
I have empathetic tendrils reaching out — having no idea on what mutual this-/that-ness we are connecting.
Funny not funny.
Depends, MagsJ
How low can one descend into the underworld, both archaeologically and ‘lelkileg’ ( that Hungarian word has no appropriate equivalent in English) but the closest is ‘through the power of the soul’ or soulfully, - AND technically.
That descent automatically tries to slow it down for a soft landing, but again hitting or crashing into the bottom, is reversely proportional to the amount of will power remaining after ‘It’ has been deflated, or decomposed.
For instance, my trying to compose an answer to you at this time, may suffer decomposition both literally and figuratively. With spaced, and spaced out ‘situations’ analogous to the don’t use alcohol forum.
That such use/misuse is relative to either proven or disproven effects to enhanced structural cohesion literary devices.
This downward trend, as is now exemplified is that device that is without which misunderstanding and rejection follows, and even further down, the exclusion and alienation that follows that.
What am I saying, what means this? (Note the dopplanger here, between what it is, implies, and the mean’s derivative, as unassumeable.
<>
The level of construction/deconstruction relevant to abject criticism, is therefore contained within a narrower justified area-situation, that may predetermine What Is this, and What This is that begs the question’s hat it really may be.
The double-edged mean then, becomes both: What It Is(what it signifies) and what on earth it could mean- where the mean is both- a sum divided by two, and a synthetic union where the sum does not equal the sum of it’s parts , but the re-construction of something different.
What I am tryin to say is that the golden double edge is always constructive, not reconstructive, because a reconstruction implies a look back into prior constructions.
A reconstruction can never become a construction, because a construction is always new, not merely recognizably different, but truly so, and the power of the will suggests That.
The truth and or falsity of not being able to recall, all structural hierarchies within a single set, (containing presumably necessary AllSets (situations) has proved to raise paradoxical occurances to to unheard of levels.
Now the above is pure flow, attained through sense and non sense( non sense implying more a sense which comes through other then the senses of sight, sound, feel, and odor.
It is a bar against the increasing losses of memory, which bars reconstruction,through recollection, of and through parts which are everlasting, as in a particular set situation between Self-other-self-Other.
The hypothetical batting average of model situations is good, far better than missing the mark of the objective.
Therefore virtually both work in tandem to come nearer to the goal point, the Home Base as it were.
Any that concerns, either This, or That.
Oh dear. I thought we were talking about one thing. Now there’re two?
…but you know what they say about false dichotomy…
Yes/No?
Fresh off press:
In the triad dicothomy-paradox-enigma, the mean deconstruction of the enigma say go directly to jail(dicothomy) do not stop on the paradox(even if the dice bounces it there, until they figure to represent two identical numbers.
If and only if a dicothomy is True, can it progress to a new synthetic verifiably truer evolution.
The irony is in the pudding, it takes another recollection, less 1 situation.
Go, for IT and hope you get a pair.
[(good luck, and if you fail, this message will self destruct, as is it’s written in invisible ink). ]
[ intentionally left blank ]
True
False
Both/Neither
I lien toward the ‘left blank’ intensionally, for intentionally blank out for rather obvious reasons…
<>
‘ Colossians 1:16
ESV
“For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities
—all things were created through him and for him.”
NIV
1 Like
I prefer not to connect(ing) with anyone right now… I’ve had ‘enough/my fill of’ interactions for this year, new quota access is available from 2024 for a limited time only.
.
…we appreciate your patience.
.
I’ll just have to take your word on all of that… 
.
Well this is the Creative Writing section…
Yes, MagsJ, and all in stride to cut from those that do die alone, and because what’s coming after the cut? The urge to gift has again possessed me to resume Schherezade’s cut from impending trust into the Vampire’s Lair.
So she must write another urgently this time for the light of day is upon us, and Salome’s 7th vail may be torn asunder.
The gifts are of course to three: Amage, who briefly brought the fanged one out, somewhat by deception , pretending to be a full blown vamp, ( in fact she was but half-never telling Salome was also a psychiatrist-dancer of the dance( macabre)
The other two are quite well known to the This Awoken Commuty, Ishthirre and Carlinus respectively.
The absence of a preface is not here, because this is going to be merely a sketch book, born of most sins capital and otherwise. This gift is not proffered to match those of the goddes echo, the profusely talented distributor of artful Paine upon clients of be known.
So herewith starts this sketchbook entitled : abraxis the great rememberer’s sketchbook of past things.
Any and all personages characterized here are not intended to resemble any living or or dead artists.
Cut.