Homosexuality, what are its causes?

Philosophy Forums Psychology and Mind
61

What do you mean ‘how I frame this’? I just reported what James thought.

And are you seriously taking iambiguous as a source for anything technical?

Truly understanding VO, requires a complete overhaul of your valuation of ‘valuing’ itself, which impacts literally everything else. When the insight struck, I knew first that God was no longer illogical, second that this theorem would take me a thousand years to fully explicate. So I cant give you a basic summary. But there is much on this site about Value Ontology. You can use the search function.

A pointer; you like Leibniz… VO explains how the existing world is necessarily the best of all possible worlds. Further contemplate Nietzsche’s thoughts on valuation, Heideggers thinking on truth, and Relativity.

1 Like
62

I mean there is repetition of patterns on different planes. Astrology works, no matter how much scorn that idea produces in those that haven’t studied it… or who has looked through some descriptions of sun and rising signs. Someone with a Jupiter-Pluto conjunction will be able to tap into serious world-powers, a Neptune Moon opposition will make for great psychic vulnerability, etc…more clearly, someone with all their planets on one hemisphere will be a simpler person than one with everything spread out… (oppositions produce greater consciousness, virtually all great philosophers have oppositions, where popular stars quite generally have planets concentrated in a few adjacent signs, most often between Virgo and Capricorn) people with dominant libras and in general western Hemisphere placements will be more well known than people with dominant aries/eastern placements (which is statistically provable using astro databases just by the distribution of Aries through libra through Aries in the celebrity entries, it progresses smoothly from fewest in Aries to most in libra to fewest in Aries), great changes and shift are guaranteed during progression transits (Sauwelios, when I showed him the transits of his progressed moon, literally said he didnt like it (astrology) anymore as it was too accurate), predictable to the day, or the hour, but clearly none of that is the physical influence of the planets. So I attribute it to patterns, where the planets can be seen to correspond to archetypes/elements in the human. Im aware this isnt any sort of explanation, by the way. Just an indication of where I would look for an explanation.

By the way when I was explaining some stuff about his aspects, Sauwelios said that a model becomes less useful as it approaches the complexity of what it models. But astrology isnt a model, but a description of a parallel phenomenon, which in complexity does indeed match the phenomenon it parallels. How could the cosmos be merely a simplifying model? incredible one would be even able to think that. Anyway, selecting in terms of usefulness rather than truth is not how I practice philosophy or science.

1 Like
63

image
image2532×1170 397 KB

((()))

If as said, the cosmos repeats

Functional complexity, as it approaches a a saturation of inferences , then that only opens the opens the door to more conflation on the level of comprehending singular modes of modeling cohesive models that can function cohesively.

On the other hand, that functional approach does lead to more complex sets of parallel Cosmological sets , and that agrees with the upper limit of inducing entailing patterns, which in turn function as dystopia of energy loss t i

64

As a consequence, functional processing, may replace entropic and simple images that serve to either enhance or deplete the image, and that results in compensating processes which do iexpand or reduce spatial dimensions, after countless reps.

So that the rate of energy loss may result in less and less decrease, .which may result in control of the very internal processes which regulate a balance retweet a more ‘realistic’ retro configuration and one which appears as if the image is becoming less land less functional with the increased complexity.

The relation between the image of simplicity and the imaginative repetition of complexity entail limits, and brackets that use functional equivalents, to limit to model it’s own lack of recognition

65

So I like patterns. I like astronomy and the weird coincidences you find in nature, like the reason eclipses work due to the ratio of size differences between the moon, earth, and sun …that sort of thing. Fractals and the beautiful number, yada yada yada.

…but I’m not really into astrology. However, the microcosm of the individual being made in the image of the macrocosm of God… that I like.

God being the irreducibly complex, maximally greatest being… that subsumes all irreducible complexity within the best of all possible worlds. That I like.

66

Ok, Ischthus here is one:

Why, did Russell’s claim of sense data correspond to Sartr’s feelings as a priority, whereas his look, implied a modern sensitivity and support fort Wittgenstein’s anthropomorphic denial of a Man-god?

Why?

I’d like to withdraw this question but barred I think by an ilp rule.

Reason? A question a child would ask

67
  1. Innate and genetic causality. There have always been homosexuals and there is wealth of evidence that most mammals seem to show this behaviour.
  2. Epigenetic causalty. It is a know pehonomenon that male homosexuals have a higher yield among second sons. It is thought that is the case because male foetuses have a higher prenatal mortality as the host mother can develop a resistence to male a foetus. It is not know if the foetus responds with feminisation; the host causes feminisation or whether it is a statistical factor of feminised foetus haveing a baseline higher survival.
  3. Environomental oestrogens, and other pollutants present in a child’s early life which can change gender asignements and preferences. These could include anything from plastic cutlery, plates, wall paper, carpets- in short the entire fabrication of modern living. These effect, like 1 & 2 are not reversible. As sexual preference is an indelible part of a person’s make-up.
1 Like
68

How much of heterosexuality can be explained by one or more of the following: paraphilia, auto-eroticism, fetishes, sexual abuse or very blurred boundaries during key developmental periods in childhood, comorbidity influence from other conditions such as gender dysphoria or autism spectrum-related confusions about self-identity, influences coming from society, media or peer groups, environmental factors such as hormones in foods, or certain genes or gene mutations?

1 Like
69

“How much of heterosexuality can be explained”

Not much because it wouldn’t exist and be the norm for the majority of the species if it could. Abnormal behavioral traits tend not to be conducive to evolutionarily stable strategies, one of which includes species reproduction, Mr. Darwinism sculptor guy. Thought you knew that, Mr. Darwinism sculptor guy.

70

It’s not that being gay is bad. The problem is that more and more bros are becoming gay for the wrong reasons, artificial manufactured reasons planted in their lives and heads by a combination of nefarious forces ranging from gay ass cologne and clothing commercials to unnecessary social conflicts experienced in school and in the family. Most of the gay kids today weren’t hormonal naturals who were born wired to be fancy but were turned fancy by a complex of these forces. We are living in a world now that produces human clay so devoid of a natural sense of identity that it can literally be turned into anything from a raging transgender emo to a man so gay he could suck the chrome off a trailer hitch, and it’d all seem normal to em. Almost like they recognized it in themselves and then chose to become what they are… and weren’t just unfortunate victims of some society on the fritz because of all the awkward conflicts capitalism/consumerism creates between people.

Most gay people are fake gays. They would have never become gay had Marcy from second period never rejected em, or dad played a little more baseball with em, or they didn’t listen to that rave music all day and paid no attention to the tiktok people who were already gay and basking in all the attention they get because of being gay (and so brave).

1 Like
71

Yeah, besides if one is a Bible thumper, it is a singular event in all the universal principles ever created that God created Man and then to avert his loneliness , God created Woman.

))(()

https://youtu.be/heTwcezrQ1E?si=Gob-Dc4VRFB3-Klu

))((. .. (())

https://youtu.be/oG6fayQBm9w?si=oUBvtC-u3AFxLhWQ

72

I believe Male lesbian is a form of homosexuality.

Last night I had a dream. In the dream I was trying to escape inceldom by becoming KJ. At the beginning of the dream I had a very mediocre looking physical appearance and wanted to increase my appeal. So I was trying on different clothing and hairstyles and then KJ appeared in the bathroom with me (it was a public bathroom.) I had on a white sweatshirt and KJ a yellow one. It was like I was the male KJ.

There was this long line I believe to enter the theatre or arcade or something. (One of the bathroom walls vanished and kinda morphed into that). Me and KJ were standing in line. I had a wide ass. KJ was admiring my ass and as we walked forward in line, she held my ass, and we made a choo-choo kind of motion. In this moment I felt right, like I felt like this is how existence is supposed to be… She kept grinding on my ass with her puss. The only thing I wished was that she had a D

IRL, someone told me they had a gf that left them cause they no longer had a wide ass. Then once they started doing sports again, it gave them a wide ass, and they escaped inceldom that way. I feel like having a wide ass is important, and objective, and once again proves that it is OBJECTIVE not SUBJECTIVE.

In my dreams its like an alternate timeline/dimension where everything is better than this one. Its like the same planet, the cities are the same, but everyone seems to be richer and have better culture and aesthetics. For example, in this IRL dimension if the buildings are run-down, full of litter, dilapidated, in the other dimension the buildings will be well kept, beautiful, etc. There is also more verticality in the other dimension. Like in this dimension, a building will have only 1 floor, but in other dimensions the buildings have 2 or 3 floors or more.

For example, everything in this dimension is fucking retarded. Like if you buy a tool or gadget online, it will often malfunction and be junk. Same with clothing, they purposefully make clothing to cause inceldom, like if you buy a T-shirt in the largest possible size it will still look fucking retarded and not OG looking, it will not extend beyond your beltline.

I used to fap to the concept of lesbian scissoring, I thought it was the best. After many years though I started to notice the lack of true symmetry - they are offset, the chakras are not on the same plane… Which is why my Futarani concept is far better. I believe that lesbian terfs are all idiots, maybe they haven’t matured yet, they have a disdain and rejection of all that is masculine, a disdain for penis. There needs to be penis and penetration. A dildo a strap-on is Fake like some loser who watches porn every day, maybe even faker than that because at least his hands are real unlike a plastic dildo or strap-on made of glass. Facts agree with me since lesbian relationships do not last long, Futarani is obviously superior. Lesbians are tops and want to top each other yet have disdain for masculinity so obviously that runs into logistics and mathematics issues

73

Do you have evidence for these claims? Or do they come from personal experience?

74

SOme of your best friends are gay#??
LOL

You do think it is bad. That much is obvious from your idiotic list of “causes”..

All mammals have homosexual tendancies.
What is the cause of that?

75

I’m gonna suggest you’re better off keeping this shit to yourself.

1 Like
76

Oh the humanity.

And this is why I prefer the company of machines.

77

Well, no one can top this but bottoms ARE versatile, they say. Dont know who they’re supposed to and how, but machines? The undecided or just curious are into very risky business to say the least, do know that profiolectic drugs are available 1X a day.

But. Uncertainty is of no avail when the asexual premis, so they also say, or the sun also rises , precedes other binary issues such as woke intolerance and such, which are far more earth shaking , as far as the military is concerned, it’s equally uncertain since you’re still not supposed to ask except if trans.

When all the dust settles down, there for sure be a lot more peace(s) to forge a hegemony . Until then I hear robotic replicant machines will forge out beautiful samples, totally indistinct for the immortal god like perfection they were all meant to be.

(Still undecided about pro or con choice, as it is.course no choice is a choice as well)