Homosexuality is caused purely by environmental factors, nurture factors - not genetic, nature factors.
1 Like
I can see this environmental influence playing out, because I am the youngest out of 6 children, my parents did have me late, and my description of how I became homosexual fits this narrative. I had a horrible vicious relationship with my father, and a much better one with my mother, hence I tended to be exposed to the female collective interpretations of sexuality, not the male one. 
.
Yes, let’s waste our time talking about petty shit when there’s a whole attack against Europe right now. 
Had people spent more time on philosophy boards talking about random shit, they would be more prepared.
Europe wouldn’t be the dystopia that it is, if most of the population did any philosophy at all.
Yes, let’s waste our time talking about petty shit…….
Ha….. you were granted an audience with that topic, what was it called… “When Harry met Sally”.
Perhaps you could display some semblance of perseverance for A & W.
.
..then that wouldn’t be petty shit would it, but relevant information. 
.
..again, I said petty discourse, not none at all. What has happened to your comprehension? [sigh]
.
..trolls, more like.. I’d rather had none.
.
A & W?
.
Re. the OP.. an unprecedented number of people started identifying as bisexual or gay during the lockdown era.. so a case of ‘when needs must’ / ‘friends with benefits’? 
Meh!
Why are you such a bitch?
And a hypocrit too, you never responded to my Europe shitpost thread, so it seems like you don’t really care so much about European politics do you.
Yet you choose to spend time shitting on a science thread about homosexuality instead of responding to my post about Europe, then hypocritically complain about people spending too much time on random topics that you don’t approve of. Like who gives a fuck if people talk about things besides your precious European politics. You seem like you’d be the type of person to go to random hobby clubs and demand they talk about politics instead of hobbies
2 Likes
Anybody who posts at a philosophy forum for a year or longer will become a bitch unless something is wrong with them. Why. Because of the nature and content of the forum environment. Three-quarters of conversation there will be sophisticated language-games. Naturally, from this, frustration and confusion arise. Next comes the aggressiveness that results from the frustration and confusion that results from the language-games. Finally, the suspicion stage; ah, they’re conspiring against me, etc.
Sprinkle a few people who should not be permitted to try philosophy at all in there and presto… you’ve got a really bad thing waiting to happen.
2 Likes
.
..because I’m not stupid.. 
.
Not so fast, young Sir.. not only did I not see your latest post, I cannot fathom how you concluded that I “..don’t really care so much about European politics” from that ill-conclusion.
.
..hence the great re-set/replacement, being in full swing. 
The Ides of March philosophy? 
.
..your thoughts?
You found it more important to post in this thread than post in my thread about Europe being invaded by Putin, then bitch to random people here for “wasting their time” with this thread. As if anyone in this forum is somehow responsible for retarded normies and crooked politicians in society. As if all the forum members here must be your slaves and only talk about European politics and not banter about other topics.
And you already posted in my Europe thread before, so you obviously knew how to access the thread and post in it again, because you are not dumb. BUT you found to post in this thread and bitch at people more important and worthy of your time, hence you are a hypocrit.
Re. the OP.. an unprecedented number of people started identifying as bisexual or gay during the lockdown era.. so a case of ‘when needs must’ / ‘friends with benefits’?
They become bisexual and gay due to lack of exercise, hormonal restructuring.
Sex is determined by genitals, not chromosomes. If you are aroused by penises but like vagina, you are bisexual, not heterosexual.
The word shemale is an appropriate, not inappropriate, term, referring to “she male”, in ebonics. The word “sex-change”, is an appropriate, not inappropriate, term… it is a more appropriate term than “gender-reassignment surgery”.
If you have a penis then you can be aroused by women, like a male is, like a man is. Many people are ashamed of their penis, and are ashamed of their penis being able to be aroused by a woman. If you don’t have a penis then you can only have female sexuality, you can never have male sexuality. A FTM enjoys being bottomed and penetrated by penis, into their vagina, that is not male sexuality.
Facial appearance is not universal and unique to race and species. If you are an ugly species then the men might look ugly and then masculine FTMs might not appeal to you. This doesn’t prove you are ‘straight’. If you enjoy sucking shemale cocks then you are not ‘straight’. Sexuality is determined by genitals and mode of operation, not facial appearance. There might be an alien species which looks cute and then you would definitely not consider yourself straight around them.
Last night I had a dream I was in a shopping mall, in the mall there were a bunch of hot cis females. In the dream I was a cis male and flirting to these females. I was a bit nervous but remained alpha and flirting to these females. Some of the females started to make jokes at me and playful banter. We all started to laugh and I felt these women were my best friends. I no longer had male sexuality at that point, and began to develop female sexuality, as if they were my besties. All the sexual tension was lost. Redpill, PUA, is a form of emasculation. Normies have to flirt to women by making jokes, by making women their friends, which is not masculine, and there is no male-female dynamic, which removes all sexual tension. Lesbians can emulate the male-female dynamic, by the way they carry themselves, creating male-female dynamic, and replicating male sexuality. Lesbians have more interest in warfare, tanks, jet airplanes, etc. Redpill, PUA, becoming normie etc. can get you laid, but will result in less sexual tension, the romance and the sex will be inferior to what it could have been. If your seduction method is to make a woman laugh then the sex will be a bunch of laughs as well.
All forms of paraphilia…all forms of sexual dysfunctions, have been explained thoroughly.
All homosexual behaviours in other species have been thoroughly explained. None of which constitute life style choices.
Nothing new…evolution and evolutionary psychology, has dealt with this issue.
The only ones resisting these explanations are the ones insulted by the implications?
There may be a nice little irony embedded in your post… let’s check and see.
If homosexual behavior is as mechanical and natural in the human species as it is in all other species, a homo doesn’t have the freewill to not be a homo?
I suspect you would say, “He can’t choose to not be a homo but he can choose to not do what homos do,” as you should if you are a compatibalist.
I can actually be like your philosophical secretary and help you sort out your positions so you have a better grasp of things if you’d like. Mr. Jameson called and said he needs to move lunch to 1:00, btw. What should I tell him?
Semite…some homosexuality in both sexes is caused by mutational loads - sheltering…others are caused by environmental conditioning…beta-male tactics.
Incels adopt female identities so as to access females and or get some sexual and emotional gratification.
Mutiple reasons, Semite…in all species, not only homo sapiens.
Nature = 80%
Nurture = 20%
“Semite…some homosexuality in both sexes is caused by mutational loads - sheltering…others are caused by environmental conditioning…beta-male tactics”
Spartan… are you sayin’ modern ‘sheltering’ is causing gene mutation or that modern sheltering is something created because of gene mutation in people (who become pussies and want democracy because their all fucked up)?
Within the framework of the Theory of Emotional Synthesis, sexual behavior is viewed not as an isolated instinct, but as a result of the functioning of the thinking apparatus, in which different emotional goal systems compete.
Heterosexuality is considered the baseline biological mode in this model, since the genotype is fundamentally oriented toward reproduction of the organism.
However, the human thinking apparatus is not merely a reproductive mechanism. It is a complex system in which physiological, emotional, cognitive, and supragenetic processes may generate different stable configurations of attraction.
The listed factors may therefore be interpreted as follows:
1. Genotype / supragenotype / architecture of the thinking apparatus
If a particular supramolecular chromosomal configuration is formed during zygote development, this may influence the architecture of the thinking apparatus, including emotional resonance patterns, sexual preferences, and attachment mechanisms.
Thus, an innate component is possible within this model.
2. Early developmental experience
If emotional fixation on particular internal models occurs during critical developmental periods, the system may form stable associations between sexual arousal and specific images, roles, or scenarios.
This is a mechanism of stabilization, not necessarily a universal cause.
3. Trauma / abuse
Traumatic events may alter the emotional weighting of internal models and influence the later trajectory of self-organization.
But this is not a universal explanation.
4. Paraphilias / fetishes / autoerotic fixations
These represent distinct cases of specific emotional-arousal fixation on certain internal models.
They are not identical to sexual orientation.
5. Social influence
Society, culture, media, and peers provide models, symbols, behavioral patterns, and emotional scripts.
This affects not the core architecture of the thinking apparatus, but its content and dynamic organization.
6. Associated conditions
Conditions affecting cognitive-emotional integration may influence self-identification, perception, and sexual goal structuring.
Conclusion:
Within the Theory of Emotional Synthesis, homosexuality does not require a single universal cause.
It may be understood as the result of:
-
innate architectural characteristics of the thinking apparatus;
-
supragenetic organization;
-
early emotional fixation;
-
trauma-related restructuring of emotional associations;
-
long-term self-organization under environmental influence.
Thus, it is a functional outcome of a particular configuration of the thinking system, rather than necessarily a phenomenon with one universal cause.