Time passes sequentially by definition. One moment follows the next. I am afraid I am lost.
Yes but, what I am trying to say that this idea of one moment of time happening and then the next moment happening next, it doesn’t make sense because look:
when there is a moment of time in existence, and then there is the next moment in the future that isn’t in existence, does the change from the present moment to the future moment happen because of what is in the present moment or does it happen because of the future moment?
if its because of the present moment, then as soon as it is in existence it comes out of existence instantly,
if its because of the future moment, it would never pass, because that future moment isnt in existence
It’s just a measure. You can pick segments of time.
Another thing, “because” is an answer to “why,” not “how.”