Religion in the end works through fascination. We read scriptures which can have many meanings, which are somewhat poetic, which sound deep and seem deep and we then associate all this with some supernatural-absolute-transcendental truth.
So any debate on religion ends up being a debate on art in a sense, on the aesthetic power of scriptures, on how many meanings it could have and how we can associate meanings to it.
For example the sentence “Ask, and you shall receive. Knock, and the door will be opened. Seek, and you shall find.” can really mean anything. What are you supposed to ask for ? not giving any precise answer makes it more ambiguous and therefore makes it “feel” deeper. Who are you asking ? which door ? what are you supposed to find ? This is just one of many examples in scripture where the fact that a precise meaning isn’t provided creates a poetic-aesthetic fascination because it can’t be fully understood. So it is mostly these mechanisms that convince people to believe, and the less precise and logical the mind of the person, the more he is impressed and conditioned by all this mystery.
So it is when the pastor says “Jesus speaks to little children”. Who knows what he tells them ? why are we so corrupt that we can’t understand it ? It must really be deep and true and mysterious! All religion is based on this. After, your local pastor - priest can create all and any reasons, justifications and concepts to “prove” and convince the poor believer in believing his religion. It is easy to work on words and create sentences that are convincing like “god is love” whatever on earth that can mean.