Homo Americanus is against biodiversity, when it comes to only one species, his own - Homo Sapient.
He rejects all diversity other than his American understanding of diversity.
What is this socialized, edumacated, indoctrinated form of “diversity”?
First of all, it is entirely superficial, and he will admit to it, since for him all ‘appearances are superficial,’ meaning uniformity underlies all multiplicity; sameness underlies all apparent differences; oneness underlies all multiplicities.
This is foundational for Homo Americanus, so by diversity he implies falsehood, or pretence, or a contrivance.
What he would describe as a “free expression” of his individuality…which presumably is also superficial, if it is to remain consistent.
All diversity, for Homo Americanus, has to do with consumerism.
Sexual options, menu options, dress options, spiritual options, lifestyle options …etc.
If we add to this “diversity” the belief that he is not a free-agency, has no free-will, then what ids being implied - though rarely ever rationalized or made ludic - is that it’s all part of what has been determined, so his individualistic expression, displayed through the previous options, are really part of cosmic fate - his cynicism is rooted here.
His self-cotnradictinos must be laughed away as universal truths, all are guilty of. His shamelessness is also rooted here, because nothing he says or does is really him…I mean what is ‘he’ other than what has been determined?
Those that do believe in free-will find in their consumer options evidence of their power.
remember, choice expressed will and options are determined by power/freedom, therefore, for Homo Aemricanus, his consumer options fills him with the sense of power and freedom.
This is partly why he rejects biodiversity…because he has no power, no freedom of choice.
Race/Ethnicity, sex/gender, are natural limitations of his freedom of choice, so he must denounce and dismiss them.
For those who don’t believe in free-will they are manmade limitations of his comic fate. He must liberate himself from all “earthly authorities”, to become fully determined by cosmic fate.
Here, ‘fate’ implies progress which is always linear and a movement towards what is eternally “better” than the past.
Anarchism is rooted here, as well: rejection of all tangible earthly arche, so as to completely and totally submit to incorporeal, intangible, totalitarian, arche - they will not submit to the tangible - their ego will not allow it - but they will completely surrender to the intangible. We see this clearly in the US.
Anarchy was a byproduct of Communism, until there was a split, given that anarchy is inapplicable because it cannot compete with what Marxism became…State authoritarianism. As long as one such entity exists, no anarchy can survive…
All change is good, once liberated from earthly restrictions, because all physical movement is towards the metaphysically divine…the good, the perfect …the one…ergo progress is always a positive term.
Uniformity is still the objective.
All individuation is a movement towards a union with absolute oneness. Remnant of Gnosticism …via Abrahamic and secular (Marxism) corruptive interludes.
No earthly collectives will be tolerated - including biological collectives, e.g., race, sex, nor any ideological collectives based on the physical, physis…but spiritual collectives will be embraced, e.g., mankind, humanity, god, chosen, sinner/saint, cosmic mind/spirit etc.