A perfect being only can and/or would create other perfect beings … Since there is a hypothesis that dictates a creator of all is perfect, then it can only create perfect beings as an aspect of its perfection.
Any lesser and/or imperfect being cannot be a construction of a perfect creator. Proof that the hypothetical creator is that we are or observe lesser beings and we are or observe imperfection.
One may argue that beings who see imperfection are imperfect … But the perfect creator is incapable of creating such beings by nature of its perfection.
This is not true Moreno, we say that an omnipotent being can create a stone it can’t lift, but perfection is a different argument entirely!!!
A perfect being, by the very definition of perfection, cannot possibly create something less than perfect, otherwise it ceases to be perfect.
If a being could make only one rock it couldn’t lift, it would still be all powerful, and would be a demonstration of its power, making imperfect beings is not a demonstration of perfection.
I want to extend this line of reasoning to point out that in Buddhism, unskillful acts are acts of those who are in the illusion aspect of a reality that is fundamentally perfect in its true state.
But a true state cannot cause a false state, so if all phenomenon fundamentally come from reality and reality is perfect, then this state cannot create the illusory state - it’s impossible.
The two core ideologies that occupy our conscious discussions of creation and ascendancy from our state don’t actually make sense when analyzed.
For example, if I do something perfect, like get 100% in the galaga challenge stage, I did not also get less than 100%. Doing perfect things doesn’t cause imperfect things. Being in a perfect cosmos doesn’t cause imperfections to emerge from the cosmos, to which we must overcome, they would always be overcome and the imperfections would never occur.
Arguing that people need imperfection to define perfection, doesn’t work, perfection has no imperfection. That’s like saying a creator needs to make mistakes in order to be perfect, which is absurd.
That’s like saying 100% in galaga is actually less than 100%.
I have more to add to this. Let’s say you’re a plumber and someone calls you to fix a burst pipe, and you can’t do the job and not only that, you burst more pipes trying to repair it.
Someone said to me I can be perfect and still make imperfect things… And I gave my plumbing analogy as a response.
Perfect beings cannot make imperfect creations without being imperfect.
No matter how you argue it, that was is and always will be an imperfect plumber.