Thank you. That’s the nicest thing anybody has said to me all day.
One big hastily generalized equivocating red straw herring man. Serial killing is a whole 'nuther thing than paraphilia and promiscuity, and society’s merely wanting to discourage X does not mean X should be discouraged.
But neither do adults have a need for sex. It is about being able to experience the joy and pleasure of sexuality within a physically and psychologically safe context (whatever that may be). That, for children, is nearly impossible to do nowadays because as I’ve explained, we have long evolved out of the kind of social ethos which made such practice normal.
Nonsense. I have seen girls who couldn’t be a day older than twelve who were remarkably well developed and just emanating health and vital energy, an energy that is not yet sexual but will become sexual once they become aware of themselves sexually, and I experienced a paternal, aesthetic attraction to them; it was not the objectification of the girls sexuality, but the objectification of the girls strength, health, fertility and vitality that will emanate through her sexuality upon her maturation, that drew me.
There is no trace of trying to exploit or use a girl as such, here. Only a deeply felt admiration and appreciation for a beautiful, young female.
Rather than thinking ‘omg, would I have sex with this twelve year old’, I am thinking ‘where can I find the proper boy to match her with sexually.’
My love of young, pubescent girls could never be sexual because of an overpowering paternal instinct to protect, design and organize them so that they may develop their talents and skills naturally and free of restriction. None of this would involve any sexual contact with me. But, at an early age, they would be encouraged to experiment sexually (and responsibly) with boys around their age.
And yes, I know what you are thinking. I absolutely would be the ultimate cult leader. But my girls would be better than society’s girls. Straight uberwenchean.