If a woman blocks a man, it’s NOT because he was kind.
If it was true you took drunk/high chicks home hoping they’d still want you when they’re sober, but they blocked you… they remembered something unkind, or sensed that was WHY you were “kind”… which it is NOT. They sensed the unkind WHY.
Plus… they are probably not kind if they get drunk before they’ll have a one night stand. That’s my opinion that is correct. Unless it was their first time getting that drunk or something.
If you respected their consent and definitely did not have sex with them without their sober consent, you are at least that kind (kinder than I have been in the past… but… anyway, that’s none of your business, unless it is…? hence me harping on “sober” as my first of four requirements”…???). The WHY, not so much, but there are worse things.
To repeat the four requirements: sober, honest, loyal, and tender.
I’ve caught you in so many contradictions… honesty is obv not your strong suit.
You’re loyal. To EVERYONE.
Tender? Your word for this is kind. You think it means lifeless sex.
Hm. Let’s focus on the first 3 for now, shall we???
I didn’t perceive myself as taking advantage of anyone until I took this mandatory training that said if someone is not sober, their appearance of willingness… even if they had it when sober and it’s not the first time you’ve been with them… is not consent.
I did have sober sex with them after that, so. That cancels out the drunk sex, right?
This is no laughing matter.
sober, honest, loyal, tender
And not just because I’m avoiding statutorily raping you.
When I hear “walk of shame” I imagine someone leaving their room after having had someone in it overnight that is not normally there, and is unwelcome by whoever they live with.
Or, I imagine them going back to their previous life after a failed relationship.
I will never experience the first one.
The second one didn’t feel permanent. I thought he’d pull his head out of his ass & sober up. And I never felt shame.
I’m probably the asshole, but not the only one.
I was also madly in love, and if he did ever sober up and I heard his voice (which I somewhat just did in one of his son’s sobriety updates), … well … it’s stupid to even go there. I’m happy doing nerd stuff & having these conversations.
I’m not saying I just want math. I’m also not trying to make you a math whore.
You’re trying to make me a whore.
I’m trying to do (what’s it called again?) mutual consent respect.
Let’s just admit neither one of us really knows how to do that very well.
…unless you DON’T want sex, because you chose to teach (nonexclsively), in which case by “just math spirit” you mean to say I DO want more than math and am concealing it. I’m not concealing anything. I’m also not expecting/hoping for quid pro quo.
I want math for math’s sake. I am afraid of it.
I also am not concealing any ulterior motives.
They are separate, but EASILY … um … comingled. It’s not my fault. I’m being very selective for a reason.
I will do math all by my lonesome (or together without sex) in this scary math world IF FORCED. I’m not saying it would be math survival sex if I wasn’t. But … I’m not saying it wouldn’t. But it’s def not quid pro quo.
If a woman needed groceries or her rent paid and I ask her for sex for it, she’d do it, that’s creepy.
If I just gave it to her she wouldn’t have sex with me.
That’s creepier.
Can women see a man’s perspective ?
Women don’t have sex with goodness…
Because of that, men try to be as creepy as they can to get sex.
This world is already dead because of that problem as I’m typing this.
The douchbags think it’s worth it to get sex once and fuck the world. Men don’t care if the world dies to get laid at least once. Women care, but they’re not as smart as men.
I’m doing a slight intervention here by teaching and other stuff.
I’m letting men and women see each other.
I’m not attached to the world dying either. I know where my soul is going after I die. I also know where all of your souls are going after you die. You’re not making smart decisions.