When you got into the matter aspect of your discussion I semi-understood your logic of “i am you”. For if you mean to say that we are all the same because we are all made up of the same thing (for example me and you are both made up of matter essentially, regardless if our genetic make up is different, we are the same thing when looking at it in terms of matter) then yes, that is correct.
But I don’t see where time fits into this argument?
If u were to mean matter though, I think it makes more sense.
Try this:
MATTER, not time can be considered a singularity existence that is all things at the same time.
Sure, matter can be what makes up the entire universe. Not time
Lost you here. The fact that no one moment is the same as the other moment in this concept of “time” does not mean that this “change” is what CREATES matter. I don’t understand the logic here.
yes.
given.
again, given.
Time is not a “thing” it is a concept, a name given to a phenomenon of a change that occurs from one “instance” to another. For if time was a “thing” than time would be something that exists in the form of matter, something with properties of which time does not have (unless you consider the fact that it is subject to change as a property). Now, since time is not a thing, it cannot be all things. BUT, if you meant matter and not time, then yes, matter is one thing, it is the one thing that also happens to be what makes up all things. Again, the usage of the word “matter” in this situation makes sense, “time” does not.
Here, “I” has to refer to matter in order to make sense. Because yes, if “I” were to be the persona of “matter” then this statement is in fact, correct. Matter is one thing that makes up all things. Thus matter is me, and matter is you.
Basiclly, the time thing threw me off, but if THIS is what you meant by your post, sorry for wasting time debugging it lol.
