The only reason Peter is married is because he abused the mechanism. In his hearts of hearts he knows he did even if he didn’t understand the mechanism.
So I have to scramble to protect his hypocrisy. His shallow and empty life.
As for babies Ichthus …. Have you looked around you?
This is a basic IQ thing. It’s not moral to bring people to this world.
This is another thing that disproves evolution. The smartest people don’t have children.
Let’s talk about Jesus for a moment. I know his life very well. He decided to marry everyone to solve this problem. He even married people he called solo travelers. That’s a lot to take on. The ‘good news’ is that he was fine after he endured it.
Jesus didn’t teach structural stuff.
Do you have any clue how difficult it is to protect all of you?
The marriage thing backfired on Jesus and I’m here to pick up the pieces.
One thing that makes the accuser a valuable asset is that it can’t lose a debate.
Between me and the accuser we can get everyone off.
K: and missing the point… winning is not the point… nor should it be…
the point is to learn… and then apply that lesson learned, into our lives…
whether one ‘‘wins’’ or not, is irrelevant…and in fact, if one focuses on
winning, you quite often miss, well everything…the point is not to win or lose,
but to learn…
You’re still dreamlessly sleeping right now. When you wake up, you won’t remember a thing.
Also, when you wake up, … you’re madly in love with me, and you dedicated a song to me, which you will perform, followed immediately afterward with a public taste test.
Crazy…women “sow their seed when young” when they are still entirely governed by their biology - their feminine intuitions.
Before they’ve been thoroughly institutionalized - indoctrinated.
If they escape reproducing with these alpha-males - which tend to be biologically attractive and so unwilling to settle - then they learn…mature…become more pragmatic.
Now they still find those males attractive, but their reasoning usurps their physical impulses and they “settle” for the man who is more socially fit, even if he lacks the genetic markers of fitness.
Hypergamy all the way.
A factor of who a female considers superior is her self-esteem.
If it is low, then most men are superior to her, and she tends to become a slut; if it is high then most are not superior, and she tends to become a whore.
This is why sheltering, and Americanism nurtures a sense of entitlement - especially in females - producing females with exaggerated and compensating high self-esteeem…making it difficult for them to find mates.
Incels, like you, are the byproduct…and so are Karens.
The reason is the destruction of Paternalism.
The motive is covered in other threads dealing with Americanism.
It’s also covered in my genes/memes thesis…
Evolution stands…and crazy superstitions fall.
Sorry crazy…
Sex is not rape…but it necessitates pretence - lies, exaggerations…as part of its seduction phase…
Flirting is a negotiation, because sexual penetration is, in fact, an aggressive act a female must be psychosomatically prepared to endure and…enjoy.
This is why actual rape is so psychologically devastating to women.
Even gestation requires pretence - the sperm must rush to the ovum before the female’s autoimmune mechanisms kills them.
Then, the alien DNA must be concealed from the female’s autoimmune mechanism - morning sickness is a symptom of her body trying to find and rid itself from an alien body…and when the infant is born love is how nature ensures that the female will sacrifice her own welfare for its survival.
All of it is covered by evolutionary psychology, for one.
Everything has a role.
Females, left to their natural impulses, are filtering agencies.
Males are agencies of aggression and conquest…they must prove themselves worthy.
So, natural selection gives way to social selection…and this shift is what confuses you, and most women, who are now governed by two impulses: mind/body.
Their bodies tell them one thing - evolved under different environmental circumstances for hundreds of thousands of years - but their minds must adapt to manmade environmental circumstances that keep changing and have only been around for tens of thousands of years.
Again…
young women are more in-tune with their bodies, their natural impulses dominate; mature women learn that these impulses are not always useful or wise, given socioeconomic circumstances, so they learn to control them and use their reasoning to choose a mate.
Some women even do the unthinkable and are impregnated by males they physically desire, while marrying the man they rationally need…and he sometimes raises another man’s children.
There was a study in the fifties that found a large percentage of children were in families where the male was not their biological father, and they didn’t know it most of the time.
Because nature always usurps nurture.
lorikeet, I barely read that but it seems to me that you’re saying that smart people either do or don’t raise their own kids. And you’re saying that sluts/whores either do or don’t have other people who didn’t father their children raising their kids. Except…you seem to exclude men from being sluts and whores. And you seem to exclude women from being smart. Meanwhile, the kids who grew up in the house of their bio-father & genius mother be like “What does he mean?!” And the women who had babies by their bio or fake father be like, “It took genius getting out of that situation, but all that happens when a woman is smart is she gets told she is wrong and then her ideas get stolen because she doesn’t care who gets the credit.”
But anyway, I barely skimmed what you said, so I’m sure I totally misinterpreted you.
I thought I was a genius in jr high and high school.
I can read micro expressions with absolute precision.
I know what made women uncomfortable or violated their boundaries.
I always modulated my speech and actions to never do this. Then I figured out they need to be made uncomfortable to select a male. I was wrong about everything.
It’s comical how simplistic and dull-minded you truly are beneath all your schizophrenic convoluted semantic word-farting.
You’re probably the kind of everyday, run-of-the-mill dullard who mindlessly repeats MSNBC and CNN political propaganda talking points to your friends and coworkers.
Compartmentalizing one’s inferiorities, while exposing them. That’s the “Polkadot” rule.
Thank you for explaining the mechanism — Have you tried transcending it? You think that because you explain the mechanism, you deserve a sexual show of gratitude—That is being a tool of the mechanism rather than transcending it. Which, granted, you admitted to being. The real reality is — it’s not about deserve, it’s about mutual submission—love despite circumstances. That’s why they head for the hills. At least that’s why the one(s) you desire head for the hills.