I’m not an incel.

Let’s take a break.

Cat saliva disappears like the wind.

That sentence has never been spoken before.

Am I a parrot mag?

Do I have to live that down before I can live it up?

I tawt I taw a putty tat.

Do you think I’m cocky?

Sometimes when it suits my needs.

But at the end of all this… I know we’re all in cages.

Most people can’t see the cage.

I’ll tell you something else, creation can only happen if you’re in a cage. The universe can’t expand without it…

Limits.

I still don’t understand what this has to do with philosophy.

Philosophy is the systematic and critical examination of fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. Philosophy normally doesn’t have to do with offended spirits who want to validate themselves and others who just pile on the abuse. The fact that this happens is one reason why people don’t normally last long here.

This thread seems to fit in numerous areas, like Psychology and Mind, The Sandbox, Non-Philosophical Chat, The Rant House. There are numerous possibilities, but instead, you post this garbage here. No wonder the standard of posts has reduced overall.

Bob,

This is relevant to eastern philosophy (of religion, yes)…

^^Bob, this is relevant to eastern philosophy (of religion, yes)…^^

Bob.

I’m teaching you everything about existence.

You would much prefer I use words to do it.

As I’d much prefer you use words to do it.

I like you because you’re protecting mag.

She’s been at me for years now. I give lip back when she gives me lip.

She’s not happy about that. Neither am I.

I’m literally telling you: Bob

How existence works. Without limitations creation can’t happen.

I just explained incels don’t exist and that it’s mass psychosis.

Mag can’t handle that.

The ONLY reason I like you bob is that you’re protecting mag.

I have a lot of things on my mind Bob. It’s nice to share the burden.

Then it should be in that area.

oh, brother :laughing:

I was saying that to Ec.

Or should the religion forum be under the Philosophy forums, and be subject to the same critical thinking allowable in the Philosophy forums?

I mean. ILP is a philosophy forum. Right?

You’re at least a very close cousin…

And on behalf of the wonderful women I know, FU!

You don’t see it from my perspective.

Women never have sex with men who don’t violate their boundaries. Men violate their boundaries to have sex.

I’m not just saying this about women. I’m saying this about men too.

I don’t think you’re sentient beings.

You’re not an incel… or a sentient being…

…prolly your attempt to absolve yourself and everyone else, amiright?

See previous.

Also, same message to you as to Lorikeet. Look in the mirror.

Ichthus.

Nobody in their right mind would violate the mechanism.

Part of what people call romance is the mind reading problem. That’s why there’s so much stalking in this world.

Everyone in their subconscious knows what I stated is true. It’s called proof of concept.

I proved it.

I’m not going to tell you what to do with this FACT!

Why don’t you give me access to all of the things you have access to and let me decide for myself?

I’ve explained it many times. If you can’t understand my words …. I have to send you to the deepest pits of hell to explain to you. I have no interest in doing that to anyone.

You can beg me to send you to hell and I won’t do it.

Beg the universe to send to the darkest corners of hell.

Don’t put it on me. I’m smarter than you Ichthus.

You don’t want to see the full force of the mechanism.

From my perspective, we were both … “there” … at/in the same “times” … not necessarily in the same order (how would one subject to time piece together that whirlwind of shredded history?)…

Assume I/we already have full (limited) access &…

…get over ourselves.

seriously

that’d be great

thhhhhaaaaanks

I voluncelled you.

Well, you sure spend a lot of time talking to people who are

just pretty with no souls, then, if you think the same thing about men as you do about women.

Why are you talking to people with no souls?

You could be chatting away with Chatgpt or gardening or reducing the pain of children in your neighborhood or…

You just told, for some reason, someone you do not consider sentient, that they do not see it from your perspective. Apart from the oddness of doing that, can you see yourself from mine?

I don’t think engaging in this thread is worth the time.

“You could be chatting away with Chatgpt”

Perhaps… he is?

Perhaps he does everything & more (whatever that means) when not replying.

He contradicts himself on purpose.

He’s mocking the way statistical generalities aren’t about anyone.

I won’t tell you why.

It isn’t random.