Especially people who know themselves.
A slave to others…
1 Like
To you, people appear to be divided into two groups: slaves and masters. Yet this distinction falters under scrutiny. Not everyone can dominate others, nor can everyone be dominated. The only form of mastery that is universally within reach is self-mastery. Therefore, it is wiser to look to those who have achieved such self-command not to submit to them, but to emulate their discipline and independence.
The advantage is clear: those who govern themselves are neither enslaved nor tyrannical. They are free not by dominating others, but by refusing to be ruled by impulse or external coercion. Moreover, human flourishing is rarely the product of domination. Cooperation, not subjugation, yields the greatest benefit to all. Only those who are deeply disordered and those driven by narcissism or a pathological hunger for control seek to bend all others to their will.
1 Like
There are more people than me they win I lose.
You seem to know that you have limits to self knowledge, thus you are establishing limits as yourself.
You also seem to trust the judgement of being untrustworthy, a judgement you placed on yourself and seem to trust.
What does this reveal?
You have layers you are not willing to explore.
Most people do not go as far as you just did. So if you are going to listen to others, by your own judgement, you are going to have to listen to yourself when they say so.
1 Like
That’s essentially what most people do. It’s called second-handedness. I myself can’t be second-handed. I have to know for myself, by my own mind.
1 Like
Yes no. If we’re such a bad thing, why did Napoleon say that it iis easier to conquer one’s self than it is a battle?